Not exact matches
When greenhouse gases increase, more longwave
radiation is directed back at the ocean surface, which warms the cool - skin layer, lowers the
thermal gradient, and consequently reduces the rate of heat
loss.
Greenhouse gases absorb
thermal radiation from the surface and slow radiative
loss to space.
While Earth's surface absorbs a significant amount of
thermal radiation because of the blanketing effect of the atmosphere, it loses even more through its own emission and thus experiences a net
loss of long - wave
radiation.
We hqppen to have such a star that delivers EM energy to the bottom of the transparent atmosphere, and that energy warms the bottom of the atmosphere by all the well known
thermal processes, until the energy
loss rate, eventually limited by
radiation, matches the supply rate from the star.
Heating of Earth's surface by sunlight and
thermal infrared
radiation must be offset by energy
losses to maintain a stable temperature.
An aside: one of the reasons that clouds modulate temperature so effectively is not just the albedo increase which bounces downwelling short wave
radiation back into space, but because they radiate IR back to the surface thus reducing the net rate of
thermal radiative
loss.»
An aside: one of the reasons that clouds modulate temperature so effectively is not just the albedo increase which bounces dowelling short wave
radiation back into space, but because they radiate IR back to the surface thus reducing the net rate of
thermal radiative
loss.
Verticle wind shear correlates well with temperature so as temperature increases you can expect more
thermal losses across the tropopause which will reduce the increase in
radiation reflected back to the surface which should reduce the expected surface temperature increase.