Sentences with phrase «thing a publisher does»

Four things publishers do know about the digital future (yes, people will read from screens.

Three things publishers don't know about the digital future (which platform will win?

You know, things publishers do.

Of course, no traditional publisher would ever have considered undertaking a project like LibriVox for so many reasons: the lack of quality control, the lack of business model and the lack of belief that so many people would be willing to do for free the kinds of things publishers do for money.

In fact, if you look at realities, there's only one thing a publisher does for you — makes it easier to get into a bookstore.

One thing publishers do now is sort through an incredible amount of dross and publish a small percentage of the submissions they see.

Michael Bhaskar on BookBrunch Four Things Publishers Do Know «Virtually everyone's views on digital publishing exist in a -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

Under the old way of doing things, publishers of a sufficient size would pay Adblock Plus directly to get their ads unblocked.

Should the many foreign publishers in Canada pull up and move out, as they're doing in British Columbia, there will be many game developers left looking to do their own thing.

The company's publisher, Dao Nguyen, wrote recently about how this affects what BuzzFeed does, and how the things it is measuring have been changing as the media industry evolves.

They say Facebook doesn't communicate directly with them about their traffic fluctuations, and it's hard to isolate publishers» own actions from things Facebook does that might affect traffic performance.

Publishers won't accept an ecosystem where those things don't exist and all the platforms know that.»

And I think long - term we definitely see ourselves as a marketplace for brands and publishers to find each other in an efficient way and to do things together.

Will it swallow the business whole, or does it really just want publishers to put neat things in users» news feeds?

But I suspect it begins by doing the one thing we writers, editors, and publishers feel we have been forbidden from doing for so long: speak the truth.

Jeff Goins argues that if you do a few simple things like he did, the editors and publishers will come knocking on your door, and you will not ever have to go begging them to get your ideas into print.

«This is a very good way to do things because it minimizes the cost to taxpayers without having to duplicate existing infrastructure,» says Frederick Dylla, CEO of the American Institute of Physics and a board member of a coalition of publishers that runs CHORUS (Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United States), a system for providing links to papers on journal's sites.

But I think one of the things that scientists and other people concerned about science education in the country need to do is make it clear to publishers that as citizens and voters, wherever they live, whatever state or town that they live [in], they will make sure that their elected officials know that textbook X, Y or Z is not to be used in this district because of its bad science.

Japanese publisher Capcom hasn't been doing as well as it did years ago due to a variety of reasons, but things seem to be improving not only for them but also for the industry as a whole.

Thing is, GTA Online doesn't have lootboxes (thankfully), and it consistently makes the highest profit from digital sources quarter to quarter among publicly traded game publishers.

Of course, I had to spend a bit of time figuring out how the numbering of pages works, where to put the title page, and other things a real publisher would have done for me.

«We can't do... all the things that we wanted to do,» Schwarzenegger said in an appearance before the California Newspaper Publishers Association.

Many websites do this because cookies enable website publishers to do useful things like find out whether your device (and probably you) has visited the website before.

The funny thing was, Howey didn't need a publisher.

It also represents one of many examples of traditional publishers not standing still, but exploring all avenues, experimenting with different models, and risking failure, things they're so often criticized for not doing by pundits with no skin in the game and pageviews to accumulate.

One thing that a traditional publisher (and I am one) will do is to get their author's books into book stores.

My publisher did sort of the same thing for me, only backwards.

With all the problems that can happen when dealing with the traditional publishers, don't forget that they do handle some things so that you don't have to.

Look at it this way: You're happy if your publisher stuffs goodie bags at conferences with your book, so why not do the same thing online?

The relative low costs of digital enable us to break into writing, build our platforms and do all the things we need to do to hone our craft and develop a following big enough to interest a mainstream publisher with a marketing budget and broad distribution.

If a publisher can convince you they have the best way to do things, then by all means you should work with them.

The interesting thing here is that this particular technology movement is a dual one: part of the shift has to do with writers and publishers; and part of it, the most important part, has to do with reader - consumers.

Traditional publishing, at least the big publishers (and their smaller group of older medium - sized publishers) have decided that the only way to come out ahead in this is to make sure the old way of doing things remains.

I got the impression that even if you publish with a traditional publisher, you're still expected to do all of the things a self - published author is supposed to do: blog, network, sign books, endear yourself to any stranger who might buy your book or who knows someone who might appreciate your prose.

Among other things, you «represent and warrant» to the publisher that the book won't defame anyone, won't invade anyone's right of privacy, and won't tell readers to do things that are dangerous.

Traditional publishers do a lot of shouting into the wind on different things they can do better.

The problem is that publishers are getting nervous because they are being pushed out of their own industry, may be time for them get with current times and re think how they do things, or become obsolete.

Are publishers doing the wrong thing with building websites instead of using social media?

Publishers have only been doing the whole e-book thing with libraries since around, some of them as late as last year.

Until they realize they're going to have to do things a bit different than simply acting as a profit - making facilitator between license holders, they're going to find themselves fighting publishers and even some retailers tooth - and - nail.

Most companies that started out between 2009 - 2014 have run into one of a number of walls related to scaling — they couldn't capture enough share to make publishers interested, couldn't get big enough to keep investors interested, tried out a business model that didn't work, couldn't raise cash after VCs moved on from ebooks to the next shiny thing, or their parent company didn't see a path to profitability and decided to wind down.

I think everyone is trying to figure the whole e-book thing out, but for profit publishers can't do it on their own.

So two things are proven here: publishers can and do get it wrong, and getting recognition is as much a waiting game as it is a proof of skills.

One thing that Knolle does make clear throughout the piece is that eventually authors and publishers are going to come around to the idea that it really is all about the readers.

I think the best thing readers can do to avoid the selfies is to become familiar with publishers just as they are with authors.

One thing trad publishers are now doing is exploiting rights reversions clauses by using ebooks.

Here are three things that you may want or expect your publisher to do — but are very unlikely to happen.

On one side you have self - destructive madmen like the big publishers who have done the following lovely things to their ebook retail partners:

But as things stand now, this doesn't even work consistently across iBooks on iPhone and iPad... which is too bad because I think there would be publishers willing to follow Virgina Quarterly Review and develop ebooks for Apple ecosystem.

A publisher can try to buy in this expertise by outsourcing the whole thing, but then they run the risk of spending a lot of money on something they don't really need, just because their supplier has convinced them of a particular route.