Sentences with phrase «thing about predictions»

The best thing about predictions are that if you are right, you can republish that post with the...

The crazy thing about this prediction is that the 6.1 - inch iPhone models won't support 3D Touch.

Not exact matches

What are some things about the strategy that offer predictions?

the thing that bothers me most about the vendehei piece is that, as a PREDICTION, it's almost credible https://t.co/ESS5Wt7eDI

Readers are cautioned that these forward - looking statements are only predictions and may differ materially from actual future events or results due a variety of factors, including, among other things, that conditions to the closing of the transaction may not be satisfied, the potential impact on the business of Accompany due to the uncertainty about the acquisition, the retention of employees of Accompany and the ability of Cisco to successfully integrate Accompany and to achieve expected benefits, business and economic conditions and growth trends in the networking industry, customer markets and various geographic regions, global economic conditions and uncertainties in the geopolitical environment and other risk factors set forth in Cisco's most recent reports on Form 10 - K and Form 10 - Q.

A prediction from a respected economist and policy maker that things were about to get worse — much worse — would not have helped matters.

Here are four predictions the elder Kurzweil made about where those things are going.

Dianne Denison helps us prepare for what may be in store with her 2018 predictions about the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).

Everyone in the business knows that the only thing the media cares about is which of the predictions were the most accurate.

From Chapter 15, «The Human Factor» (Page 157): ``... we'd try to make one thing clear: We were not offering any promises or even predictions about the returns our clients might achieve.

The holy grail for those who want to preserve the idea of free will is a rigorous articulation of the proposition that mere prediction does not imply the lack of freedom (or, perhaps, a lack of the meaningful kind of freedom, since we all mean different things when we talk about «free will» anyway).

We are 2 - 0 up with 10 men and every comment is about negative things like Kos being sent off and predictions about Liverpool scoring and winning their game but no congratulatory cheers for either of the 2 goals we have made.

Believe it or not, Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger actually knows a thing or two about football, and the 20 - year Arsenal man proved he's still smarter than the average fan by making a bold Euro 2016 prediction that turned out to be completely true.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's a solid dependable prediction and the best thing about it is, if it's wrong there won't be anyone around to say so.

«Quantum mechanics makes certain predictions» about how things move and behave «that we don't normally see in the regular world,» he says.

Then you can make very clear predictions about what certain changes mean and verify those things experimentally.

The Yahoo! Labs scientist and author explains why the «law of the few» is bunk, why history is full of failed hedgehogs, and why we can't make good predictions about just those things we most want to predict

But even, in some cases, short of that sort of thing, there are fascinating questions about whether or not we can use this knowledge to improve our prediction of things like earthquakes and whether or not we can find ways to be able to sometimes use some of these phenomena to our advantage, so things about like with volcanoes being able to use those for geothermal energy, that sort of thing.

«Because of Australia's isolation it becomes a tool to make predictions about what kinds of things are likely to happen during climate change,» Archer says.

Many statistics reveal trends, which can be used to form hypotheses and make predictions about certain things.

Just getting started While other groups have used machine learning to come up with predictions about where different kinds of metallic glass can be found, Mehta said, «The unique thing we have done is to rapidly verify our predictions with experimental measurements and then repeatedly cycle the results back into the next round of machine learning and experiments.»

In general, climate predictions are «best case» analyses because climate scientists (actually all scientists) do not include things that they are not sure about.

I'll answer that by giving general predictions about the way things are going:

With the Oscar Prediction pages fully updated, we discuss the top categories of the Oscars not without arguing about things that ultimately you can't prove in July.

The lesson begins with prediction, requiring students to infer and deduce, then looks at 3 extracts with imagery that suggests things about the character while describing something else.

I made a prediction about a year ago that things were going to change in the student loan and education industry; based on being a student myself, having recently worked in financial aid and institutional collections, and also in enrollment service.

One of the things that I've learned from my «stock trading days» is to not make predictions about whether a stock is going to go up.

While we are talking about this, I think a person needs 3 things to have any chance at making predictions (albeit limited) regarding the market.

Advisors with a long - term perspective won't make predictions about what any of the gyrations mean or will lead to because these fluctuations don't genuinely matter in the grand scheme of things.

[Greece springs to my mind — regardless of debt developments, I think it's a failed country anyway, as things stand] Of course, people are far too confident about choices / predictions, prob.

The most important thing you need to realize about designer dog genetics is that it is impossible to make any exact predictions about what the puppies will be like.

I'm happy that I got a lot of my predictions right when I posted about the Nvidia Shield, but at the same time, that isn't a great thing.

Indeed, every single «original» idea from this guy's mouth has turned out to be as accurate as the likes of Young Earth Creationism (aka not in the slightest) and his chances of getting things right seems to be about as «good» as the daily horoscope, TV psychics and Micheal Pachter's predictions (aka non existent).

The only thing I don't like about that prediction is that projectiles are special moves and are always on the B / Special button in SSB.

The 10 Sony E3 2016 predictions do have the truth where we know it, but since we all are thinking about what the big reveals will be and hoping for certain things, we throw in some speculation and hopes too.

I don't want to make any precise predictions about the future, but if things just stay on the same trajectory as 2013 then we can look forward to lots more great indie games.

There's 1 thing i'm still wondering though «- «-RRB- / In the trailer, there's a scene showing Noctis in some kind of place with red skies and a flying monster, Does anyone have any info or maybe predictions about it?

The IPCC predictions are serious enough without some of the alarmist tendencies to overstate things about runaway greenhouse effect or oceans rising multiple feet.

The really great thing about this, I suppose, is that later Goddard can create a double cognitive shortcircuit by writing - another - article about how the predictions he fabricated in his first article turned out not to be true.

-- in which case, that's a statistical model prediction, which, at least in this context, we shouldn't rely on — if we actually know some things about how the climate works then it makes more sense to use that knowledge.

Science is about figuring out how things work, and the usual test of understanding and usefulness is prediction.

And one more thing that really bothers me about climate model predictions that is rarely discussed around here, and kind of swept into the closet, which is prediction skill.

In general, climate predictions are «best case» analyses because climate scientists (actually all scientists) do not include things that they are not sure about.

About the only thing quantifiable by the AGW proponents are the predictions by the models.

Despite how things look, the new Climate Prediction Center's forecast for the Feb - Mar - Apr period calls for an enhanced probability for above average rain — about 50 % chance, versus the neutral 33 % chance.

Climate prediction models share one thing in common with them: even if they could be right, their creators will not want to believe them if predicted results do not correspond to politically correct preconceived notions of the establishment about how they should be...

The thing about successful predictions is that you have to make them beforehand.

If things are so good now, despite declines in summer sea ice, what does that say about the accuracy of their predictions?

Looking into my green crystal ball, here's my bold prediction about the US - China «wind energy race,» if there ever was such a thing.