Sentences with phrase «thing about religious»

That's the funny thing about religious people; unlike atheists, they conveniently forget about the existence of all other religions but their own

The most important thing about the religious and ethical teachings of Jesus is not that he taught them but that he thought them.

funniest thing about religious articles is the immediate comments from atheists and forever haters of religion.

And the thing about religious value experiments, why they are different from others is, of course, that the payoff isn't even in this life.

You can say this same thing about the religious.

One of the worst things about the religious people is that they think that because science can't give you all the answers immediately that an ancient book is the obvious fill - in for anything missing.

Not exact matches

To put things in context, Bell followed that quote up by expressing his disappointment when communities of faith discourage people from asking questions about religious texts or beliefs.

But around 1980, central banks got religious about inflation and started to do drastic things, like raising interest rates.

Keep your religious ideas to yourself and I won't say a thing about it.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Sure, all of us are ignorant about some things, whether it's because it holds no interest for us, or we haven't had the opportunity to learn about it, or because reality conflicts with our religious beliefs.

The state absolutely shouldn't be about proclaiming things that are ultimately religious in nature.

This case is about one thing and one thing only: Religious money attacking a scientific organization that actively uncovers information that makes religion less and less relevant.

But it's nice to see religious people are bigotted about things other than religion too, like other nationalities.

Funny thing about many religious people is they are so busy focusing on getting the «Word» out that they aren't focusing on listening to any other words either — even if it's (heaven forbid) to make another's suffering more bearable.

The president did the right thing, but your side is running around screaming about religious rights being taken away, and THEY ARE NOT!!!!!!!!

I think you're reading things in her article that aren't there, and using her article to expose your own feelings about «religious» types.

If they're religious they're praying they won't die and the LAST thing on their mind is wasting their last moments on earth discussing something they've never personally seen, only read books about or heard lectures upon.

If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or religious, is the only thing on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and talk about civil war may not be alarmist.

Am sick and tired of this talk about the religious and the non religious things being taken as an excuse to squeeze crashing down those nations or countries... innocent peaceful people are the first to pay the price in such conflicts and wars..

I do not see any of the religious folks with much in the way of good things to say about gay people.

It seems that you have filled your mind to the max of things to prove to religious people that you know what you are talking about.

Reading the account of how this professor expressed himself about the author's experience with the dying begs the question in my mind, - How many religious scholars and clergymen are as truly enlightened about life, death and the nature of things as they self - satisfyingly claim to be doctored in religion?

In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.

I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...

The thing that makes me uneasy about having elected officails from certain religious groups is that, being female, I'm not sure a person who suscribes to a set of beliefs that does not permit a woman to occupy the highest leadership posts in the organization is going to promote policies in my best interests.

An overly long article describing how the devout struggles over something no one cares about, and a professional opinion from BU telling us that these religious nutjobs are taking things way too seriously.

But I'm pretty sure one doesn't need to force their religious laws on other people to have their belief, which is the only thing we're really concerned about.

its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?

We talk about the same things you religious folks talk about.

If i was an atheist I would not worry about taking advantage of other people for my own benefit since I would have nothing to loose... Again I don't listen to what religious books say they all have been twisted, but some things are common sense.

In fact, I agree with some of the things Atheists say about religious folks.

(8) Evolutionary discussion often betrays a positivistic bias which sees scientific truth as the «real» truth about things, with other forms of truth, including religious truth, relegated to providing only an emotive, valuational and relativistic set of preferences about things.

The nice thing about completely crazy religious people is that they make slightly less crazy religious people like you and me feel better about ourselves.

He became somewhat popular among the crowds as a result, and certain religious leaders became nervous about some of the things he was saying, so they got the local government to arrest Josh.

Religious nuts have been saying the same thing about how terrible things are at the moment throughout history.

(continued from 6/1/09) As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see....

If you believe all that happened randomly, that the bang was powered by nothingness, then you could teach us religious folks a few things about faith.

The things I find most appalling about religion reach a new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down of individual thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the views of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation of women to the point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a general back - sliding against the rest of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.

In contrast, Caldecott states in the first line of his preface: «The book is about Tolkien's spirituality, by which I mean his religious awareness and experience, the things he believed about life and death and ultimate truth» (p xi).

One of the things I'm standup about is not making bigoted remarks about others» beliefs (i.e. that the religious are brainless).

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

The reasoning goes something like this; the truth is written in the bible and we know this because it is written in the bible, of course you could say the same thing about any other religious tome.

There are people that say the same kinds of things you say about «religious people» like you that say the same kinds of things about «atheist people.»

In the things they do and say about God, religious people diverge quite sharply.

Every religion stands within the uniqueness of religious intuition (whereby intuitions also can contradict or have a only volatile character, without losing thereby the character of intuitions: cf. FR 38, PR 13, MT 50) and general theory about the nature of thing» (1LM49).

When particular elements in the traditional teaching about the nature of things have been challenged by demonstrable scientific findings, the whole structure of religious dogma has been called into question.

Christ would not have good things to say about todays «religious leaders»

As to your religious beliefs, you don't have a damn thing to say about what a person does in their private life, including their health - care decisions.

They got fooled into believing the same things as the religious loons do about a God.