That is, there is such
a thing as the absolute truth on all questions and those truths are knowable, but everybody else is wrong about them and that's the truth.
Not exact matches
The bible is a historical record of many
things... but quoting passages that represent a great variety of differing views
as if each one is some sort of proof of
absolute self evident and unquestionable
truth not going to convince.
It's not a negation of
truth or
absolute truth, it's just a recognition that we might be
as confused over
things as our kin in the faith who chained up Bibles, burned the bones of reformers, tossed bombs into the basements of black churches and burned crosses on the front yards of black people, who ignore the plight of the homeless and the poor while we struggle to decide between the 36 and 72 inch plasma screen tv.
For one
thing, Hegel says
as much: «As science, truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape of the self, so that the absolute truth of being is the known Notion and the Notion as such is the absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende
as much: «
As science, truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape of the self, so that the absolute truth of being is the known Notion and the Notion as such is the absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende
As science,
truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape of the self, so that the
absolute truth of being is the known Notion and the Notion
as such is the absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende
as such is the
absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende).
«52 And both are exercising a healing role
as they reveal
absolute truth about the nature of
things: «Churches and Rituals,
Granted, we might say that the proposition «if x is an intellect, then x distorts reality by spatializing it» is an analytical
truth akin to «if x is a bachelor, then x is unmarried,» and Bergson would even accept this (CE 270), so long
as we are simply drawing implications about
things we have already defined.12 But Bergson does not treat any definition
as unrevisable,
absolute or permanent.
Ignorance and naiveity are one
thing, but to spread it around
as an
absolute truth, it just asks to be stopped.
Does not this suggest that, by using the degree of complexity
as a guide, we may advance very much more surely than by following any other lead
as we seek to penetrate to the
truth of the world and to assess, in terms of
absolute values, the relative importance, the place, of all
things?
Of course, I'm
as guilty
as anyone else of assuming I know God's thoughts about
things, but I've recently found myself a bit more hesitant to call my biblical interpretations
absolute truth.
But I give you these
things, not
as my opinion — I give them to you
as divine
truths which are
absolute.
and also, googling information on the internet is not the same
as finding it in the Scripture, though their is alot of good information giving knowledge on the Bible, it is not to be replaced with going to God's Word for
truth, i still cant believe you are claiming to be a christian and you also claim that the Bible is not a Holy instrument of God, and that Paul speaks
things that arent
absolute truth, this is nonsense to any child of God.
13 For example, Whitehead says: «Art has a curative function in human experience when it reveals
as in a flash intimate,
absolute Truth regarding the Nature of
Things.
Islam,
as people know today, was Hebrew teachings or teachings of son of blessed Mary, was never about religion, but
truth absolute Thin Allah, so much so, word religion did not exist in Hebrew language or in even in Qu «ran, there is no such
thing as religion, but Thin Allah, consti tution of America, other wise known
as Law of West.
The problem is that many don't see that there is such a
thing as natural law,
as absolute truth - some
things are always bad, like murder, and some
things are always good, like snuggling and holding babies.
And yes ratings arent an
absolute thing they are subjective, but
as long
as you do nt claim your review is
absolute truth there is nothing wrong with using them imo.
The
truth about auto insurance is this: in an
absolute sense, there is no such
thing as full coverage.