Sentences with phrase «thing as an animal»

The New English Bible translation is to be preferred: «If there is such a thing as an animal body [cf. Vulgate: corpus animale], there is also a spiritual body» (1 Cor.

I see that they're doing a lot of the same things as animals, and I can see parallels between their biology and the cell biology of animals.

Now you know that there IS such a thing as an animal - based Superfood!

No such thing as animal spirits, businessmen r cautious w / debt $ $ RT @EconTalker: Spending is the consequence of prosperity, not its cause.

Keep in mind there's no such thing as an animal behaviorist.

The warmth did have an influence on such things as animal migrations but talk of continuing warming from Hansen & Co. is just rubbish.

Some additions you can include with your car insurance plan is collision coverage, towing and labor coverage, and other then collision coverage which covers such things as animals, theft and vandalism, and many other situations that are not covered in collision coverage.

Not exact matches

As much as I mentioned my concern about animals and the environment, people can't see those thingAs much as I mentioned my concern about animals and the environment, people can't see those thingas I mentioned my concern about animals and the environment, people can't see those things.

Don't say you want to start a circus because you love animals but disregard the fact that you don't understand things such as maintenance, real estate, insurance and marketing.

But believe anything that can give u with full eveidence ex: science with evidences All religious books are just a «bully» only to common people to believe for not doing any bad things & live as a human only (not as animals).

Well it is true that some people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...

There were animal sacrifices and things such as burnt offerings, grain offerings.

We see the same creativity of God all around us today in the life of plants and animals and in all things such as the waters of the ocean and the air we breathe.

Doing so would not lead us to treat animals like people but rather to treat the weakest people like animals, opening the door to such things as conducting medical experiments on the cognitively disabled, which has already been proposed in bioethics literature.

Larry Arnhart, in particular, seems to have blurred this fundamental distinction, for he quotes Aquinas («Conservatives, Darwin & Design: An Exchange,» FT, November 2000) as saying that «natural [emphasis added] is that which nature has taught all animals,» when Thomas actually said that «those things are said to belong to the natural law [lex naturalis] which nature has taught to all animals.»

The context of Genesis 1:26 - 27 gives us the best clues as to what is meant by «image» and it probably refers to the things that set us apart from animals — our intellect, emotions, will, authority to rule over creation, desire for relationships, and other non-physical attributes and characteristics.

Ever wondered why he stopped killing rival tribes, just as we did, stopped demanding animal sacrifices just as we did, stopped wanting the death penalty for many trivial things just as we did and started accepting gays and other minorities just as we did?

For all are ordered together to one end, but it is as in a house, where the freemen are least at liberty to act at random, but all things or most things are already ordained for them, while the slaves and the animals do little for the common good, and for the most part live at random... (1075a16 - 23)

and how Allah reveals not withstanding the facts that the chapters in quran are named as animals, things, ETC..

As for gods... well, ever noticed how animals (and people for that matter) are fairly easily spooked by things that aren't there?

If a lion kills a zebra we don't call it «murder,» and if a great white forcibly copulates with a female, we don't call it «rap.e» If everything is objective to people, moral code being up for grabs, it seems quite feasible to live in a world where these things labeled as crimes are all just as ok as in the animal world!

At most, you can find Genesis 9:1 - 6 as allowing eating of meat and not explicitly stating that it is OK to eat human flesh (as long as you don't consider humans as «moving» creatures), but as far as looking at the law in detail goes; search the Law in detail and you will find many explicitly laid out things that you «shall not eat» listing many different types of animals and circumstances but you will not find humans listed among them.

It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?

Nobody can assess the mental qualities of a dog without having once possessed the love of one, and the same thing applies to many other intelligent socially living animals, such as ravens, jackdaws, large parrots, wild geese and monkeys.

The objects of our ordinary experience, things such as rocks, trees, animals and persons are composites or groupings of what we have been calling occasions of experience.

Persons share with some nonpersons such qualities as being mammals, animals, and living things.

An animal selects from his realm those things which he needs, but he does not see it as a separate whole nor, like man, complete what is perceived by what can be perceived.

Thou ow» st the worm no silk, the beast no hide, the sheep no wool, the cat no perfume... Thou art the thing itself; unaccommodated man is no more, but such a poor, bare forked animal as thou art,» Lear strips all humanity naked with his words of terror and abandonment as he works to discover what it means to be a man, not a king.

As with your thing about killing animals, the Bible makes it clear that while animals should be treated justly, Humans rule over the animals.

[21] As no material thing can reflect on itself, the ability to reflect on ourselves, which sets us apart from all other animals, must be a power of something immaterial — the immaterial soul, of which the mind is a power.

Currently, animals are relegated to the category of «things» and, as such, are not entitled to the compassion and care they deserve.

«Animals have no souls; therefore, according to the most authoritative Christian theologians, they may be treated as though they were things.

But the ordinary things they long for, and the things that they find funny, and the infinite variety of things they dream of, and the games they play, and animals they wish they could have, and things they like to eat, and clothes they wish they could afford to buy, are not as different as the world seems to believe from what most other children in this land enjoy, or dream of, or desire.

Things are seriously mixed up in our country if Tebow is seen as someone who should be scorned, when so many other pro athletes abuse drugs, abuse their wives, abuse animals, and commit crimes on a regular basis yet the public seems to be just fine with overlooking that behavior.

To be the designer or craftsman of beautiful things was to fulfill man's natural role as what Henry called a «decorating animal.»

Rather, before we make hasty, uninformed guesses about things as enormously complicated as whole organs and animals, we must first look at life's foundation» molecules and cells» to see what natural selection can explain there.

As the Bible underlines, the Almighty is no species - egalitarian; the creation accounts bring man and woman into view as the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for foodAs the Bible underlines, the Almighty is no species - egalitarian; the creation accounts bring man and woman into view as the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for foodas the summit of the visible creation, with everything else placed at their service, and in general, with lower things being placed at the service of higher ones (plants are given to animals for food, and later, after the flood, animals are given to men for food).

Not sure about the animal thing as humans are the only animal that cries from emotion.

Here and there it may be, we can catch a glimpse of the wonderful order in nature, the regularity of the stars, scattered over the wide spaces of the universe yet obedient to one law; the order to be found even in the microscopic world, as also within visible things concerning which science has given such amazing information in recent years; the order in the construction of a flower or of an animal, from the flea to the whale, a noteworthy obedience to law even in the life of man.

By the way, I had always felt that Gandhi's quote was a bit self - serving coming from him, as respect for animals is one of the few things that Hinduism and other eastern religions does better than most.

The death of the animals is loss enough, but it is not half so serious as the injury to personality that occurs in one who kills his own sense of reverence for life and his sense of kinship with living things below him in the order of creation.

As to what will happen in the future, I hadn't thought about the pollution of humanity with animal DNA, but I hesitate to say it is the exact same thing.

The process of synthesis by which azoic elements have reached their present multiplicity and complexity is an evolution, the same process entirely as the biologist traces in the order of living things, and the synthetic chemical compound embodies in itself a complex relativity capable of being expressed in most exact laws, which reflect the evolutionary emergence of its substance as much as do the organs of an animal explained in terms of evolutionary development.

Analogous to this are also feelings, consciousness, and intentions, which the child initially attributes to all beings and eventually limits to animals and humans; typically, as the previous statements about passivity and self - movement indicate, feelings, consciousness, and intentions are explicitly taken away from «things.»

Consider, then, the sky and earth and the whole world as containing animals in the way in which worms are sometimes contained in the human intestines — worms or men, if you please, who ignore sense and feeling in other things because they consider it irrelevant with respect to their so called knowledge of entities.

Yet there is no such thing as an equal and abstract love for all humanity, any more than there is for all animals.

Just as we now routinely shuffle the genes of plants and animals to produce a variety of outcomes (smarter, bigger, leaner), so we stand on the very edge of attempting the same thing with human beings.

It seems to me less arbitrary and more logical to go along with Jennings (quoted by Agar 1943, p. 153), who wrote after years of study on the behavior of amoebae: «I am thoroughly convinced, after long study of the behavior of this organism, that if Amoeba were a large animal, so as to come within the every day experience of human beings, its behavior would at once call forth the attribution to it of states of pleasure and pain, of hunger, desire, and the like, on precisely the same basis as we attribute these things to the dog.»

The democratic societies have no one supreme or dominant member, with examples being such things possibly as stones and probably as some cell - colonies and even special forms of many - celled plants and animals.42 Monarchic societies, on the other hand, do have a supreme or dominant member which radically subordinates the parts to its ruling purpose but which can never completely rob the parts of all measure of control over themselves.

We can gain new appreciation for the unity of all living things if we recognize that what we know as reason in humanity has its counterpart at a lower level in the animal world.