Sentences with phrase «thing changes the model»

This sort of thing changes the model to allow people to search for themselves, thereby reducing the need for an agent.

Not exact matches

The only thing that could screw him up is if he lets Comedy Dynamics complete an evolution that seems as inevitable as it is obvious, because the comedy - industry model is changing yet again — and this time, Volk - Weiss's customers are morphing into very deep - pocketed competitors.
A pivot can change any of nine different things in your business model.
Brimmer: I think the future of agencies is in serious crisis right now, and I think just kind of seeing a little bit of what's happening with WPP and Martin Sorrell recently and the way that that model has changed — is really going to be interesting to watch how things unfold over the coming years.
You have to break things, change people, and build some new habits yourself to be the right role model.
Connected consumerism says that things are not only changing, but are so radically different that the business models we have today can not support a much more dynamic approach to the market.
«The industry needs to adapt to a new business model so things are changing, money is being moved around, there's margin compression for everybody so it requires the use of technology to solve some of these problems,» he says.
The great thing about Wealthfront's investment portfolios is that you can can manually change your risk tolerance number to see how the model portfolio changes.
As Matt Sweetwood eloquently concluded, «If there is one thing I learned from my parents» experience in constantly having to reinvent their store and dramatically revise their business model, it's the transformational concept that the time to reinvent yourself is when you're at the peak, not when the world has changed around you and you're desperately scraping to survive.
Yes, the details of how we get, use and deliver things have changed — as have the characteristics of how things perform as new business models and capabilities are applied.
New York City - based STORY uses a novel retail model «that takes the point of view of a magazine, changes like a gallery, and sells things like a store,» according to a press release.
You've changed with the times: maybe your original iterations make me want to throw up a little bit, but today, I think you're doing a pretty good job at the role model thing.
O'Connor's prayers are hardly «inspirational,» in the sense that many American Christians want: a model of the «victorious Christian life» where «prayer changes things» and we've got «joy, joy, joy, down in our hearts, to stay.»
but they show HARD WORK is one thing that matter, that could change the game atleast than just waiting the ball, then punch the ground when failed to score, or stroking her hair posing like a victorian secret models.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
i do nt get it folks.buying players is no guarantee to success.examples Tottenham and recently Manure.Mata is not going to change much at Man u.it takes time to blend a winning team.it took 4 yrs or so for Man City to win the league after they started to be spoiled by oil money.Arsenal FC is doing its things by its own way.it is following its self sustaining model and we still competing.
And the promotion of «traditional» marriage will continue to make people unhappy, first because there is no such thing as «traditional» marriage — marriage has been changing since humans created the concept — and second because the model doesn't work for about half of us, probably more as many people stay married in name only just to get health benefits, etc..
The thing we liked the most about this model is ability to change 6 different positions, from newborn to the older baby.
Medical Anthropologist Robbie Davis - Floyd explains why we've gotten so obsessed with machines and numbers, how things are changing back to models that work in various parts of the world, and what you can take from those models to improve your experience.
This can mean different things for different models; for example removable cushions to make more space or seat and foot rest support that can change height.
But the critical thing is to know what this algorithm is predicting; how to justify it; what is the model of climate change built into the algorithm; what risks of error are built into the algorithm that is predicting climate change?
My model takes into account five things: the vote share a party received in the by - election constituency at the preceding general election; changes in public opinion towards the party since the last general election; whether the party won the seat at the last election; whether the party is in government; and whether there are «party effects» on by - election outcomes.
The more some things change, the more they stay the same: Farm owners at the time cited high property taxes and labor costs as threats to their business models.
But the droughts and fires of 2011 may only be a preview of things to come; climate change is expected to raise temperatures and could also reduce rainfall in Texas, according to climate models.
«With the UCSF team, thanks to funding by public and private organizations, we're able to harness the team science model for collaborations like this that yield findings with the potential to change things for patients who've had very few options for far too long.»
«The thing that's impressive is that morphological changes in the neurons that many labs have seen, both in fragile X patients as well as in mice that model fragile X, were reversed by changing the expression of this PAK gene.
«Changing the dark matter model enlarges the lamp post you're looking under,» he says, upping our chances of finding WIMPs — and other things besides.
A recent trend in GCMs is to extend them to become Earth system models, that include such things as submodels for atmospheric chemistry or a carbon cycle model to better predict changes in carbon dioxide concentrations resulting from changes in emissions.
But in 1939, Joseph Schumpeter, one of the most influential economists of the twentieth century, defined innovation as the thing that happens when firms figure out how to transform inventions into constructive changes in their business model: in products, processes and organizational design.
I would say that as far as advancing our ability to really look at the issue of climate change, I think one of the things we really need to do is to make our models interact more between the physical sciences and the social economics, and to really understand the link a little more closely between climate change and the drivers and impacts of climate change.
Funny thing, fashion has changed so much since I started modeling, I now can work at my natural size and I do not have to gain or loose weight to find jobs.
There's a lot of competing forces and a lot of things changing in healthcare right now but the bottom line is what integrative medicine offers is extremely valuable, prevention - oriented, money saving, and it's absent from the current healthcare model.
Model Colorado Champion Paine4Gains Fitness shares, «Sometimes you just got to change things up!!!
(Just don't let modeling places tell her that she needs to change things... I think we need to see more natural beauties xox)
Another thing I love about the maker - centered business model that Ten Thousand Villages takes is how they really focus on not only fair wages and good working conditions for their workers / makers, but also really focusing on creating a sustainable, long - term opportunity that's going to ultimately change an entire community.
I love that I can change my business model on the fly and adjust things within my company to keep things interesting and to keep my passion level at a constant high.
Things change when Gerda loses her model one day, and asks Einar to pose in stockings, ballet shoes, and a dress so she might finish a piece.
This latest game to fly the Hot Wheels franchise banner uses basically the same driving mechanics that the series has used for years, relying on a very basic arcade racing model with only a few slight race mode variations to change things up a bit.
While Netflix likely will have to keep evolving its model to have more of a theatrical presence, it is doing too many risky things on the feature front to be defined derogatorily at this point, especially by a French festival that risks rendering itself arcane by not using its clout to change French chronology rules that keep French - distributed films from SVOD for three years.
The two approaches that we describe»» individual growth modeling and hazard modeling»» are methodologically complementary and provide ways for the researcher to address critical questions about «how things are changing» and «how long it takes.»
While one is called the «turnaround model» and the other is called the «transformation model,» they amount to the same thing: using the same types of interventions applied over the last number of decades to try to improve struggling schools — replacing some staff, improving professional development, changing the curriculum, etc..
«The thing we get with games that is different from what we get with books or other media is that we are able to actually build models of relationships between the different moving parts of a system and let people mess around with them, let people experience what happens when they change one variable or when they introduce a different kind of behavior,» says Ian Bogost, an associate professor of computational and digital media at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
The end of the Dream Car project also features a student evaluation form (PDF), on which they write three things they like about their Dream Car model, two things they would change, and one thing they've learned.
Focusing on two complementary longitudinal methods — individual growth modeling and survival analysis — Willett and Singer provide new avenues for researchers to address critical questions about how things evolve and how long it takes for change to occur.
Some models do add new costs, for such things as purchasing technology; making facilities and furniture changes in existing schools; transitioning pay discrepancies for some tenured or contract - protected teachers; or obtaining design assistance to choose and tailor reach models.
And parents don't know that our district will be the model for all others — because we do it best — we will collect SSP data in the form of social and emotional surveys, we will change our curriculum to socially engineer our children with social and emotional instruction without parents suspecting a thing, we will assess and survey up the wazoo about academics, school climate, cyberbullying, etc. while willing parents stand by, we will enhance our teacher evaluation program and refine it into a well - oiled teacher manipulation machine, and since our kids would do well no matter what because we have uber - involved parents, it will look like everything the Administrators are doing at the State's recommendation causes the success.
Remind students that a system is made up of interconnected parts, and models reveal cause and effect relationships, so students should think deeply about how changing one thing may affect the other parts of the system.
I have to be optimistic, just because our schools are in such a precarious position right now, really changing the model of what we know as schooling — the hours are different, the kids» needs are different; we've got to do things differently — that's a tough conversation for us.
The superintendent said the model is transferable if everyone «adopts the mind - set that things need to change and that people will work together.»
Keeping things simple and using the tried and tested PDSA model of change, provides a vehicle in which to reach and involve all members of staff.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z