This sort of
thing changes the model to allow people to search for themselves, thereby reducing the need for an agent.
Not exact matches
The only
thing that could screw him up is if he lets Comedy Dynamics complete an evolution that seems as inevitable as it is obvious, because the comedy - industry
model is
changing yet again — and this time, Volk - Weiss's customers are morphing into very deep - pocketed competitors.
A pivot can
change any of nine different
things in your business
model.
Brimmer: I think the future of agencies is in serious crisis right now, and I think just kind of seeing a little bit of what's happening with WPP and Martin Sorrell recently and the way that that
model has
changed — is really going to be interesting to watch how
things unfold over the coming years.
You have to break
things,
change people, and build some new habits yourself to be the right role
model.
Connected consumerism says that
things are not only
changing, but are so radically different that the business
models we have today can not support a much more dynamic approach to the market.
«The industry needs to adapt to a new business
model so
things are
changing, money is being moved around, there's margin compression for everybody so it requires the use of technology to solve some of these problems,» he says.
The great
thing about Wealthfront's investment portfolios is that you can can manually
change your risk tolerance number to see how the
model portfolio
changes.
As Matt Sweetwood eloquently concluded, «If there is one
thing I learned from my parents» experience in constantly having to reinvent their store and dramatically revise their business
model, it's the transformational concept that the time to reinvent yourself is when you're at the peak, not when the world has
changed around you and you're desperately scraping to survive.
Yes, the details of how we get, use and deliver
things have
changed — as have the characteristics of how
things perform as new business
models and capabilities are applied.
New York City - based STORY uses a novel retail
model «that takes the point of view of a magazine,
changes like a gallery, and sells
things like a store,» according to a press release.
You've
changed with the times: maybe your original iterations make me want to throw up a little bit, but today, I think you're doing a pretty good job at the role
model thing.
O'Connor's prayers are hardly «inspirational,» in the sense that many American Christians want: a
model of the «victorious Christian life» where «prayer
changes things» and we've got «joy, joy, joy, down in our hearts, to stay.»
but they show HARD WORK is one
thing that matter, that could
change the game atleast than just waiting the ball, then punch the ground when failed to score, or stroking her hair posing like a victorian secret
models.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of
things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business
model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and
change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business
model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke
model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great
things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has
changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
i do nt get it folks.buying players is no guarantee to success.examples Tottenham and recently Manure.Mata is not going to
change much at Man u.it takes time to blend a winning team.it took 4 yrs or so for Man City to win the league after they started to be spoiled by oil money.Arsenal FC is doing its
things by its own way.it is following its self sustaining
model and we still competing.
And the promotion of «traditional» marriage will continue to make people unhappy, first because there is no such
thing as «traditional» marriage — marriage has been
changing since humans created the concept — and second because the
model doesn't work for about half of us, probably more as many people stay married in name only just to get health benefits, etc..
The
thing we liked the most about this
model is ability to
change 6 different positions, from newborn to the older baby.
Medical Anthropologist Robbie Davis - Floyd explains why we've gotten so obsessed with machines and numbers, how
things are
changing back to
models that work in various parts of the world, and what you can take from those
models to improve your experience.
This can mean different
things for different
models; for example removable cushions to make more space or seat and foot rest support that can
change height.
But the critical
thing is to know what this algorithm is predicting; how to justify it; what is the
model of climate
change built into the algorithm; what risks of error are built into the algorithm that is predicting climate
change?
My
model takes into account five
things: the vote share a party received in the by - election constituency at the preceding general election;
changes in public opinion towards the party since the last general election; whether the party won the seat at the last election; whether the party is in government; and whether there are «party effects» on by - election outcomes.
The more some
things change, the more they stay the same: Farm owners at the time cited high property taxes and labor costs as threats to their business
models.
But the droughts and fires of 2011 may only be a preview of
things to come; climate
change is expected to raise temperatures and could also reduce rainfall in Texas, according to climate
models.
«With the UCSF team, thanks to funding by public and private organizations, we're able to harness the team science
model for collaborations like this that yield findings with the potential to
change things for patients who've had very few options for far too long.»
«The
thing that's impressive is that morphological
changes in the neurons that many labs have seen, both in fragile X patients as well as in mice that
model fragile X, were reversed by
changing the expression of this PAK gene.
«
Changing the dark matter
model enlarges the lamp post you're looking under,» he says, upping our chances of finding WIMPs — and other
things besides.
A recent trend in GCMs is to extend them to become Earth system
models, that include such
things as submodels for atmospheric chemistry or a carbon cycle
model to better predict
changes in carbon dioxide concentrations resulting from
changes in emissions.
But in 1939, Joseph Schumpeter, one of the most influential economists of the twentieth century, defined innovation as the
thing that happens when firms figure out how to transform inventions into constructive
changes in their business
model: in products, processes and organizational design.
I would say that as far as advancing our ability to really look at the issue of climate
change, I think one of the
things we really need to do is to make our
models interact more between the physical sciences and the social economics, and to really understand the link a little more closely between climate
change and the drivers and impacts of climate
change.
Funny
thing, fashion has
changed so much since I started
modeling, I now can work at my natural size and I do not have to gain or loose weight to find jobs.
There's a lot of competing forces and a lot of
things changing in healthcare right now but the bottom line is what integrative medicine offers is extremely valuable, prevention - oriented, money saving, and it's absent from the current healthcare
model.
Model Colorado Champion Paine4Gains Fitness shares, «Sometimes you just got to
change things up!!!
(Just don't let
modeling places tell her that she needs to
change things... I think we need to see more natural beauties xox)
Another
thing I love about the maker - centered business
model that Ten Thousand Villages takes is how they really focus on not only fair wages and good working conditions for their workers / makers, but also really focusing on creating a sustainable, long - term opportunity that's going to ultimately
change an entire community.
I love that I can
change my business
model on the fly and adjust
things within my company to keep
things interesting and to keep my passion level at a constant high.
Things change when Gerda loses her
model one day, and asks Einar to pose in stockings, ballet shoes, and a dress so she might finish a piece.
This latest game to fly the Hot Wheels franchise banner uses basically the same driving mechanics that the series has used for years, relying on a very basic arcade racing
model with only a few slight race mode variations to
change things up a bit.
While Netflix likely will have to keep evolving its
model to have more of a theatrical presence, it is doing too many risky
things on the feature front to be defined derogatorily at this point, especially by a French festival that risks rendering itself arcane by not using its clout to
change French chronology rules that keep French - distributed films from SVOD for three years.
The two approaches that we describe»» individual growth
modeling and hazard
modeling»» are methodologically complementary and provide ways for the researcher to address critical questions about «how
things are
changing» and «how long it takes.»
While one is called the «turnaround
model» and the other is called the «transformation
model,» they amount to the same
thing: using the same types of interventions applied over the last number of decades to try to improve struggling schools — replacing some staff, improving professional development,
changing the curriculum, etc..
«The
thing we get with games that is different from what we get with books or other media is that we are able to actually build
models of relationships between the different moving parts of a system and let people mess around with them, let people experience what happens when they
change one variable or when they introduce a different kind of behavior,» says Ian Bogost, an associate professor of computational and digital media at the Georgia Institute of Technology.
The end of the Dream Car project also features a student evaluation form (PDF), on which they write three
things they like about their Dream Car
model, two
things they would
change, and one
thing they've learned.
Focusing on two complementary longitudinal methods — individual growth
modeling and survival analysis — Willett and Singer provide new avenues for researchers to address critical questions about how
things evolve and how long it takes for
change to occur.
Some
models do add new costs, for such
things as purchasing technology; making facilities and furniture
changes in existing schools; transitioning pay discrepancies for some tenured or contract - protected teachers; or obtaining design assistance to choose and tailor reach
models.
And parents don't know that our district will be the
model for all others — because we do it best — we will collect SSP data in the form of social and emotional surveys, we will
change our curriculum to socially engineer our children with social and emotional instruction without parents suspecting a
thing, we will assess and survey up the wazoo about academics, school climate, cyberbullying, etc. while willing parents stand by, we will enhance our teacher evaluation program and refine it into a well - oiled teacher manipulation machine, and since our kids would do well no matter what because we have uber - involved parents, it will look like everything the Administrators are doing at the State's recommendation causes the success.
Remind students that a system is made up of interconnected parts, and
models reveal cause and effect relationships, so students should think deeply about how
changing one
thing may affect the other parts of the system.
I have to be optimistic, just because our schools are in such a precarious position right now, really
changing the
model of what we know as schooling — the hours are different, the kids» needs are different; we've got to do
things differently — that's a tough conversation for us.
The superintendent said the
model is transferable if everyone «adopts the mind - set that
things need to
change and that people will work together.»
Keeping
things simple and using the tried and tested PDSA
model of
change, provides a vehicle in which to reach and involve all members of staff.