Sentences with phrase «thing climate analysis»
The last thing climate analysis needs is to attribute natural geologic occurrences, bad as they are, to the same causes as a warming climate.
http://www.realclimate.org/ Not exact matches
In general, climate predictions are «best case» analyses because climate scientists (actually all scientists) do not include things that they are not sure about.
I suspect many things play a part in climate analysis.
In general, climate predictions are «best case» analyses because climate scientists (actually all scientists) do not include things that they are not sure about.
One thing that was not clear, was whether the analysis, that involved both observed temperatures from the HadCRUT4 dataset and global climate models, took into account the fact that the observations do not cover 100 % of Earth's surface (see RC post «Mind the Gap!»).
Climate Reference Network (CRN) and Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) are a collection of climate monitoring stations which track, among other things, soil moisture and temperature at a series of Climate Reference Network (CRN) and Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) are a collection of climate monitoring stations which track, among other things, soil moisture and temperature at a series of Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) are a collection of climate monitoring stations which track, among other things, soil moisture and temperature at a series of climate monitoring stations which track, among other things, soil moisture and temperature at a series of depths.
Spectral analysis, unless properly understood may lead to very misleading conclusions, here are shown four essential things one needs to be aware of all the time: On the other hand there are again unnoticeable data curiosities, this graph shows an unusual configuration within one of the top five temperature data sets used by the climate scientists in their calculations, predictions and computer models.
The obvious thing to do is to use regression analysis to calibrate the climate models forecasts.
No deeper analyses, no retractions or amendments from grown understanding, no tangents into new problems, no bringing back of things he learned from this work to other (non climate) fields.
And the centerpiece of their «expert» analysis about the «great» things states are doing on climate policy?
Dismissing the risks of global warming as «baseless and undisguised propaganda,» a John Birch Society blogger has pronounced that evidence for climate change is «shoddy,» and that, on the basis of Bjorn Lomborg's (thoroughly discredited) analysis, «a little warming wouldn't be such a bad thing after all.»
By agglomeration is meant things like the IPCC AR meta analyses, or policy statement by the APS or the NRC on climate.
Although it is from 2007 and hopefully things are better now, try this from Kevin Trenberth, head of the Climate Analysis Section at the USA National Center for Atmospheric Research occasionally a lead author of IPCC Scientific Assessments:
The first thing to know about the new study authored by NOAA scientists about the global warming «slowdown» or «hiatus» over the past decade is that the new analysis gets pretty deep into the details and will mainly be of interest to specialists who study climate science.
About the only solid thing I can say out of this analysis is that if my numbers and logic are correct, then one of the fundamental equations of the current climate paradigm is falsified...
My earlier research has concerned, among others things, the use and the reliability of LES, the application of nonlinear time series analysis on flow fields, and the inclusion of marine organic aerosol sources in global climate models.