Sentences with phrase «thing under discussion»

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Knowledge and Engine have submitted comments [PDF] to the US Patent and Trademark Office explaining how examiners could improve the quality of patents that the USPTO issues by expanding their search for «prior art» (that is, evidence that the thing under discussion has already been...

All depends on what the thing under discussion is.

Religion Coursework Writing Tips for Students If a student has to write a religion coursework, there are a lot of thing under discussion and the topic should be chosen according to the knowledge and own preferences of the student Religion as a subject is useful for the study of intercultural concepts and opinions The knowledge of the other religion principles can play a great role in the personal views.

Not exact matches

Maybe if one had read the blog posts under discussion and watched the whole thing, it would.

Have asked folksy under the discussions section for a category for things like crystals / healing tools / spiritual / metaphysical items etc..

Krueger said a number of things are still under discussion, including the SUNY empowerment plan and the education aid that the Legislature restored to the budget and the governor vetoed.

I actually that policy commitments are (at best) secondary when it comes to determining GE outcomes, and that these are in fact decided by how well things seem to be going under the incumbent governing party (or parties, in the case of a coalition government) and how well - placed the main opposition is to capitalise on any disasters that occur, but that's beyond the scope of the discussion.

Another thing: Be very leery of people on internet discussion boards who post under fake names and use pro-bodybuilders or cartoons as their avatar photos.

The LA Lakers are way up the cutting edge of this stuff and that's some really cool stuff that Cate Shanahan is doing with them and if you just go google like Lakers diet or Lakers Cate Shanahan, you'll see some of the things they're doing, I mean like, you know, I was having this discussion with one of my buddies who's scout for major league soccer, I told him that if he ever had a team that actually wanted to kind of incorporate a lot of these ancestral living concepts and healthy eating concepts and you know, kinda introduce these stuff in the professional sports that I would be more than happy to help just because like this stuff flies under the radar so much and when we're talking about everything from NFL athletes finishing up their career and having a ton of brain inflammation that can be controlled with stuff like you know, curcumin and huperzine and a lot of these elements that can for example decrease hypoperfusion to the brain or increase your ability to repair your nervous system.

There's a lot of good answers and discussion about electrical issues and other complicated things, but to me it sounds like the steering lock is under tension and not allowing the key to turn all the way and start.

You are free to make your own choice of any ideas for compare and contrast essay, the only thing you have to remember is to draw a concrete line between these two objects under discussion, which is not only going to separate these objects, but also to join them in some way.

But the possibility of such things is under active discussion.

On Dot Earth there is a lot of discussion of large scale ideas and projects, but many positive things that are happening remain under the radar screen: day to day activities — people administering conservation land, going to hearings about transit options, cleaning up vacant lots and turning them into community gardens — these things don't often produce results dramatic enough to make the news, let alone a nationally, globally prominent source like the NY Times.

The leak of the SOD was a good thing; the IPCC still has the opportunity to do a much better job, and the wider discussion in the blogosphere and even the mainstream media places pressure on the IPCC authors to consider these issues; they can't sweep them under the rug as in previous reports.

For instance, one thing I'd like to know is why Christy is mentioned by Trenberth et al. when he isn't even an author of the paper under discussion.

Then you can focus discussion on what needs to be discussed — the things you find under - supported in some scientific case or another (or the things you find to have merit in the contrarian case that are not generally accepted in mainstream science), vs. seemingly pointless discussions of policy that are based on fundamentally different assessments of physical reality.

As it happens, we've been making the odd venture into Comment is Free discussions recently, and the funny thing is that the vast majority of our time on there has been spent fending off accusations that we are paid deniers, astroturfers, corporate sock - puppets, and that we've been posting under multiple aliases as part of an orchestrated campaign.

While we understand the UNCITRAL's will to move things forward since discussions are at a stalemate, we believe that whatever rules the Working group produces under this limited mandate will have little to no use.

«We have come up with ideas and things that work for Victoria and have led discussions that have led to things being done different at the BCREA level,» he said, adding that these local innovations would tumble by the wayside under the new system.