Hawks does a similar
thing with homosexuality in Red River when he has John Ireland and Montgomery Clift discuss the virtues of handguns and ask to hold each other's pieces.
Not exact matches
We've isolated and condemned
homosexuality as an especially egregious sin because 1) it's a sexual
thing (and we're obsessed
with sex), 2) it's relatively easy to identify and name, (unlike gossip and materialism and greed, which are condemned more often in the Bible and are more pervasive in our culture), and 3) it is «other,» (when you're straight, and in no danger of committing homosexual acts yourself, it's easy to call it an abomination because it's easier to remove specks from others people's eyes.)
Homosexuality along
with other
things are sin!
Their story made me see that
things aren't that simple, and that the «war» between Christianity and
homosexuality represents a false dichotomy that is incredibly painful and destructive to Christians
with same - sex attractions.
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives
with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships
with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all
things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation
with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing
with abortion,
homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and state.
He was pointing out that the Levitical prohibitions against
homosexuality are part of the same law code which condemns many
things, such as the eating of pork and the wearing of garments that are woven
with two kinds of material.
Geneticists speak of «mapping» the human genome, so that we know where genes «for» all kinds of
things (from
homosexuality to manic depression) are located; a promotional video produced by the Human Genome Project asks viewers to «imagine a map that would lead us to the richest treasure in the world»,
with which we will know «where... every genetic inheritance of humankind is to be found».
For the most part, it's a love story both incisively specific — it has a brace of genuinely profound, provocative
things to say about
homosexuality in a mostly accepting, but overwhelmingly straight, world — and swooningly identifiable; anyone, regardless of their orientation, who's had a fleeting night or two
with someone that could have turned into more, will feel a firm twang on their heartstrings here.