Not exact matches
I haven't blogged much today on
things religious because I've been so so busy meeting
with people: heart - attacks, grievers, and others in their own particular trials.
But believe anything that can give u
with full eveidence ex: science
with evidences All
religious books are just a «bully» only to common
people to believe for not doing any bad
things & live as a human only (not as animals).
Funny, you don't seem to have a problem
with all of the
religious people doing the very same
thing all over this country.
Well it is true that some
people seek sorcerers to implement Jinn that are satanic demons into mankind or his house or his business to finish him or make his life miserable or to stop flow of his business income... In such case it is either you are
religious enough and say your prayers often then it becomes hard for this to harm you or otherwise you need to find some one who practice exorcism to remove this evil... But many are just pretending to be good at it and help you not but squeeze money out of you
with tales and stories... There is another type of possessions and that is not through a sorcerer but directly by coincidence what man is at his weakest moments and those weakest moments for a possessions are when you come through a great fear or when cry or laugh loudly in hysteria, or during a certain moment of mating... or even when sneezing loudly... That's why there are prayers to be said on daily basis to guard you from such
things and specially if passing haunted places such as deserted houses but most evil ones are residents of public toilets and market places... Some of them even would claim that you have made a wrong action by which you have killed a dear one to them and for that they have possessed you and that is mostly night time such as throwing a cigaret butt to a dark place or stepping killing an insect or even an animal at night which could have been one of them or possessed by one of them... So this is true
thing happening to many who suffer unexplainable illnesses or sufferings which could look like mental illness that comes and goes as pleased...
I do not see any of the
religious folks
with much in the way of good
things to say about gay
people.
In other words
with all the
things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the
religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information
people need to know at this particular time.
I know that I see elements of divine around me in
things and in ways that others don't, including other
religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up
with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as
with those who label themselves as athiest...
When we have to communicate
with religious people it is best to dumb
things down.
If you present facts and logic to any
religious person that conflicts
with the dogma they subscribe to, the same
thing happens.
That's one of the
things that make this whole issue so absurd —
religious people demand the right to government - led prayer (a prayer that meets
with their approval, of course), but the
things they'll typically ask for in their prayers can't be by accomplished by their god anyway, so it's a lot of unnecessary trouble over nothing.
The main problem I've seen
with people accepting evolution (aside from plain old
religious grounds) is a lack of concept of the vast amounts of time over which these
things happened.
People with out those Religious things of beliefs which most atheists do not believe in and would like to eliminate in total will only drive people to become like Machines, (Ro
People with out those
Religious things of beliefs which most atheists do not believe in and would like to eliminate in total will only drive
people to become like Machines, (Ro
people to become like Machines, (Robots).
Religion is and should be a very personal
thing, the problem I have
with religious people is that many seek to impose their system of belief on everyone around them.
I consider myself a christian,
with religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I do not hold to a set of views dictated by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong, as someone pointed out earlier to most «
religious people» to question ones faith or organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to do... test ALL
things to see what is true.
The sad
thing is that none of these
people except the neglected Kingsley knew how to deal positively
with the
religious import of the new knowledge of nature.
Too many of us
religious people are complacent
with the absolute knowledge that theirs is not just right, but the ultimate, the only and that researching any
thing differenet is a useless pursuit.
He's not an idiot, he knows that there is no control over that
person when they remove the fear that comes
with the total
religious experience and replace it
with just the «nice
things» and «feel better» experience.
In arguing against the possibility of attaining to a neutral standpoint on matters of concern to
religious persons, one begins
with the axiom that all human activity — and so, by extension, all scholarly activity, all
religious activity, and all interaction among serious
religious persons — both implies and evinces a commitment to some particular metaphysic, some view as to the way
things are and as to how human activity should proceed in that context.
If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less»
person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the
thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated
with a Major League
Religious Team?
So to those
people that have a problem
with the politics of the «
religious right», I'm
with you, but don't confuse
things and make that out to be a problem
with Christ, because they're not the same
thing...
And that God's dear
people will no longer be obsessed
with spiritual and
religious things to the point of division.
So wait you aren't going to blame what was obviously Politics on
Religious Wars lets not forget that there were a few things involved in these «Wars of Religion» and I am sure most historians will agree with me, firstly the Crusades weren't thought up as some ideological crusade to protect Christians from some horde of Muslims coming from the east, they were in - fact land grabbing and trying to stave off the eventual fall of what is now known as Istanbul, secondly I highly doubt that most of the average religious person had any idea just how politicized the church became during this time period or up until probably John Paul the II took over, I mean the Thirty Years War could have been called a Religious war under this Videos silly ass
Religious Wars lets not forget that there were a few
things involved in these «Wars of Religion» and I am sure most historians will agree
with me, firstly the Crusades weren't thought up as some ideological crusade to protect Christians from some horde of Muslims coming from the east, they were in - fact land grabbing and trying to stave off the eventual fall of what is now known as Istanbul, secondly I highly doubt that most of the average
religious person had any idea just how politicized the church became during this time period or up until probably John Paul the II took over, I mean the Thirty Years War could have been called a Religious war under this Videos silly ass
religious person had any idea just how politicized the church became during this time period or up until probably John Paul the II took over, I mean the Thirty Years War could have been called a
Religious war under this Videos silly ass
Religious war under this Videos silly assumptions.
David L. Schindler criticizes the liberal view of the human
person that he sees encoded into the American project in First
Things, to which Richard John Neuhaus responded
with a more positive view of our national heritage, in which
religious faith and a strong tradition of civic associations moderate the excesses of liberal individualism.
In a recent interview
with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful
things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the
people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same
religious beliefs that I had.
I understand your heart
with this because
people can get
religious about a lot of
things when everything we do should be from a heart of love whether it's preaching or healing.
I suspect that the
people of the city of Boston, the place where I live and work, would find Paul's Corinth quite familiar: a port city, a regional capital, bustling
with commerce,
with an ethnically heterogeneous population of diverse
religious affiliations, endowed (among other
things)
with a flourishing sex industry.
When Our Saviour Yeshua Mashiah came it is importnat to note that he didn't try to change the Romans i.e the government at that time as His
thing was not against them, he came to help
people as individuals and its only when we as
people change can we begin to see change in the world and this is why God is a very personal experince and not
religious, we need teachers but not the
religious types, we need teachers who guide us to God
with us and this is what Our Saviour did, we have the freedom to choose but we can only choose if we have what to choose from and being informed helps us to do this
Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good
things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a
religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the
peoples became great, so to is it now
with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled
with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..
Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad
things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all
things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500
people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other
religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple
with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
Therefore the
religious person needs to be disciplined and equipped in body and mind for the task,
with more calmness and mastery in the midst of peril and turmoil, more sensitivity and deeper insight into the bonds of interdependence that hold
people together in rich community, a more passionate and richly integrated life purpose which can transmute the common
things of daily experience.
A nation who tolerates
things like «mega churches» and
religious figures who continuously seem obsessed
with parting
people from their money and generally running scams, is harrdly qualified to answer what Jesus would do.
Here is one of the wonderful
things about living in this incredible Indian culture,
with its rich variety of
religious traditions - one of the many gifts God gives to God's
people.
Ya... the SAME
things were said about the printing press and when bibles first became available to the average
person... So, I'm going to go
with «NO,» this doesn't undermine
religious authority or threaten churches.
Religious people always seem to be the most preoccupied
with the end of all
things, and Christians have been particularly ravenous for end - times narratives and Left Behind bric - a-brac in recent decades.
Of note is that the US government already favors secular rights over
religious rights for certain
things; for example, members of a religion that consider
people with dark skin to be evil would still not be allowed to discriminate against such
people under current US law.
Such interactions
with other
people teach you
things that you would never have expected to learn, such as economic perspectives on the cap and trade system, the role of
religious symbols in psychedelic rock, or simply that most Ph.D. students share the same fears and doubts.
Elective methods for meeting individuals your genuine age incorporate
things like joining social or
religious associations which permit you to blend
with similarly invested
people.
But when you narrow your search down so in particular, eg
people that are Christian dating interracial singles trying to find others
with the same
religious background and same attraction for a different ethnicity,
things can get even tougher.
The best
thing about online dating in France is the fact that the
people there don't care about where you are from or what your
religious views are, single women there just want to fall in love
with a guy who connects
with them on a personal and emotional level.
People place importance on different
things — like
religious beliefs, career, location, or even how close you are
with your family.
The resources available will use dyslexia friendly fonts so all students can access the learning - Students will summarise our learning from the previous six topics
with some one mark questions and will write down the answers in your exercise books Students will then recall the differences between science and religion on the origins of the universe and life and will make a list of three differences between science and religion Students will study and research the different interpretations in Christianity of the Genesis creation story and will answer four tasks based on research about these different interpretations Students will study the role that science and religion play in
people's lives and will make a list of
things that attract
people to science over religion Students will make a list of
things that make
people religious and will then plan for a potential 12 mark question
The following translated details come from Gematsu... - Dragon Quest Builders 2 is set in the world of Dragon Quest II following the events of its story - corrupt cleric Hargon and the God of Destruction Malroth were defeated by the descendants of the heroes, and peace visited the land - a
religious order that inherited Hargon's intentions appeared
with the intention of eradicating the Builders - peace that came after Hargon's death collapsed
with the rise of the «Hargon Order» - Hargon Order spearheads the destruction of towns and castles all over the world - earth falls into ruin, and there are little remains left of
peoples» lives - but for a
religious order whose goal is to destroy the world, a Builder
with the power to create
things is a major hindrance - protagonist of Dragon Quest Builders 2, a Builder, was captured by the Hargon Order and thrown into jail - previous update introduced a boy named Malroth, who has the same name as the God of Destruction Malroth - Weekly Jump teases that there seems to be some sort of secret surrounding him
I think the harmful «moral absolutism» is in fact coming from
people with irrational beliefs that mainstream climate science must be wrong because A) it runs counter to their
religious beliefs (the «God wouldn't let us screw
things up» camp, who like to say how we're too small and insignificant to actually affect Earth's climate) and / or B) it runs counter to their political beliefs (in that they think environmentalism = liberalism, and that liberalism = the evil commies) and / or C) it runs counter to their fundamentalist belief in the transcendant wisdom of unregulated markets («get government out of industry's way and everything will be allright!
Lastly, the idea that all «
religious»
people, by which I assume you mean
people who believe there is a God, go to church, that sort of
thing, think only
with a certain mindset, that is, a non scientific mindset, believing or disbelieving based entirely on blind faith, and never facts, is shown wrong by
people like G K Chesterton and especially C S Lewis.
She's an avowed modern natural lawyer, so you can sort of see how Mr. Vellacot got
things twisted in his head the way he did, because your classic, historical natural law theory was espoused by
people like St. Thomas Aquinas, who's views on law were certainly well - integrated
with his
religious beliefs.
A
person with «sole custody» has sole legal custody, and does not need to include the other parent in the decision making process
things like health, education, or
religious upbringing issues of the children.
One of the most important
things it implied was that if our society ever separated a group of
people based on the colour of their skin, their ethnic background, their
religious beliefs or any other commonality, then that society is wrong to begin
with.