And in her first show at Cecilia Brunson Projects the Venezuelan - born artist develops this through a kindred spirit, Beatrix Potter, among other
things a natural scientist and a pioneer in fungal spore reproduction.
Not exact matches
As Albert the Great, medieval philosopher,
scientist, and teacher of Thomas Aquinas, remarked: «In the
natural sciences we do not investigate how God the Creator operates according to His will and uses miracles to show His power, but rather what may happen in
natural things on the ground of the causes inherent in nature» (In I De caelo et mundo, tr.
Philosophy has to take notice of what is established by
natural scientists but, equally, philosophy enables usto judge some of the
things said by
scientists, for example, about the nature of matter.
«It is the one and the same God who establishes and guarantees the intelligibility and reasonableness of the
natural order of
things upon which
scientists confidently depend, and who reveals himself as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.»
Not only is this disassociation apparent but it seems to leave theology particularly exposed; for while the metaphysician may be criticised for paying insufficient attention to empirical enquiry, and the
natural scientist too little to abstract argument about ultimate principles, at least both appear to be directed towards describing the structure of
things: metaphysical and
natural, respectively.
After all they were interested in the ultimate constituents of
things and in the manner of their combination, and in the ancient world they were actually referred to as «physiologoi» which can be translated as «
natural scientists».
«2 Eventually, he let go of the dogma that had dominated Western thought: the belief that events are guided by a sure, rational hand and that
scientists and philosophers are capable of reading the print of that hand as it appears in
natural and cultural history He acknowledged that all
things «perpetually perish» — where «perish» refers not to the end of all time but to the end of every moment.
Scientists have created a molecule that mimics the look and behavior of a
natural enzyme, a workhorse protein that speeds up chemical reactions in living
things.
«Well - being is a universally applicable concept, yet because it can mean so many different
things to different people, pinning down an exact definition is difficult,» said lead author Eleanor Sterling, who is the Jaffe Chief Conservation
Scientist in the American Museum of
Natural History's Center for Biodiversity and Conservation.
An international community of conservationists,
scientists and sociologists needs to join the concerned citizens and researchers of Nicaragua in demanding two
things: first, independent assessments of the repercussions of this mega-project; and second, that the Nicaraguan government halt the project should the assessments confirm fears that this canal will yield more losses than gains for the region's
natural resources, indigenous communities and biodiversity.
Leonard Hayflick, the
scientist who discovered that cells have a programmed moment of death, says that there is a
natural age limit for organisms, that
things wear out and die.
Growing up in the shadow of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and The Bethesda Naval Medical Center, with a father, a clinician
scientist in paediatric neurology at NIH, combined with a growing curiosity about all
things biological and medical, I developed a
natural inclination to become a
scientist.
For example, 87 percent of
scientists say that humans and other living
things evolved over time and that evolution is a result of
natural processes such as
natural selection; only 32 percent of the public accepts this as true.
It is TI's belief that fun, interactive learning tools and resources nurture
natural curiosity in how and why
things work, inspiring future engineers, and even tomorrow's
scientists, mathematicians, doctors and teachers.
Our exhibits are designed to entertain the history buff,
natural scientist, artist, and lover of all
things Cannon Beach.
Though
scientists warn that global warming will likely continue for centuries because of the long
natural processes involved, there are a few
things we can do to decrease the effects.
In 1990, two years after NASA
scientist James E. Hansen issued his now famous warning about climate change during a congressional hearing, Lindzen started taking a publicly contrarian stance when he challenged then - senator Gore by suggesting in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society that the case for human - induced global warming was overstated and that
natural climate variability could explain
things just as easily.
«We don't fully understand how to input
things like changes in the oceans, and because we don't fully understand it you could say that
natural variability is now working to suppress the warming,» Jones admitted to the paper, apparently acknowledging what skeptical climate
scientists have been attempting to convey for years.
There is definitely more
natural variation in all
things than our mainstream
scientists give credit for (and this because the math we actually use in calculations «factors out» the variation giving us a Math World rather than a Real World Perspective) Group Think has lead to many disasters in the past and will lead to more in the future if we seek to ridicule those who show us a different perspective on the arguments.
That's not the worst
thing in the world and is a
natural tendency of everyone, but we shouldn't pretend its just low key
scientists giving us «just the facts.»
This is normal empirical research, yet
natural scientists seems very afraid of such
things.
Roy Spencer, principal research
scientist at the University of Alabama - Huntsville, says, «The main
thing they're trying to show is that the recent warming and moistening in the last 30 years is outside the range of
natural variability, and that man is causing the warming.
We might well expect to see the same
thing in other subjects: for example, life
scientists no longer need to affirm evolution through
natural selection, it has become settled science; geologists take plate tectonics for granted today, although they would not have in the 1960s when there was a scientific revolution underway.