Sentences with phrase «things about claiming»

Jerry: The nice thing about a claim that starts with «All» is that you only have to come up with one example to the contrary to disprove the statement.

Jerry: The nice thing about a claim that starts with «All» is that you only have to come up with one example to the contrary to disprove the statement.

Match making service is available for singles at idating4you.com, an free online dating site that makes it fun... Meet your Next Date or Soulmate · Chat, Flirt & Match Online with over 20 Million Like - Minded Singles · 100 % Free Dating · 30 Second Signup Mid Twenties Online Dating The thing about claiming to have gotten into online... 20s aren't nearly as terrible as I'd remembered them.

How To Slow Down Online Dating If you're single then welcome to a week - long bonanza of drunken snogs, handsy... Avail this report: www.qyreports.com/ask-for-discount/?report-id=52351 The... File - syncing services like Google Drive, Dropbox, or OneDrive might be moving data in the background, which can eat up your bandwidth and slow down your internet... The thing about claiming to have gotten

Mid Twenties Online Dating The thing about claiming to have gotten into online... 20s aren't nearly as terrible as I'd remembered them.

Not exact matches

IN 10 years, CJ King and Co Pty Ltd has grown from a small annex behind a North Beach home to what it claims is the biggest full colour printer in the Southern Hemisphere — a $ 1,500 investment that is now turning over $ 10 million a year.With the assistance of Austrade and the WA Department of Industry and Resources (DoIR), the company is taking on the UK market, already with some success.One of the remarkable things about this success story is that it has been achieved through a consummate belief in a philosophy to use standardised, leading - edge technology and to supply just the print trade and other on - sellers.

«The other peculiar thing about this whole discussion is that the claim of privilege supports the accuracy of Comey's account,» he said.

Whether the employee simply has a knack for always saying the worst possible thing or the behavior puts your business at risk for a sexual harassment claim, it's important to do something about the employee as soon as possible.

By far, the oddest thing about Donald Trump's 1995 tax returns, a portion of which was published by The New York Times on Saturday, is not the massive $ 916 million loss — some 9,385 times as large as what was taken by the average filer who claimed a similar loss — but this: 1995 was actually a very good year for Trump, perhaps one of the best of his career.

As for her assertion that newcomers should find the process rewarding enough to brave an intimidating tableau of wires and capacitors and diodes, well, just think about how some people claim to love assembling IKEA furniture: the careful laying out of the parts, painstaking examination of instructions, a few false starts and, ultimately, the satisfaction of things slotting into place as the final product takes shape.

«Just about every good thing that's happened to me in the last decade of my career has been because of social media,» says Zapar, who claims to be «the most connected woman on LinkedIn.»

The agency has been trying to make this better, or at least it has issued a report about making it better, but FDA approval is by its very nature anti-Valley, the opposite of moving fast and breaking things — which is why so many health trackers and similar devices (even apps) are very careful about their claims.

For one thing, doctors are terrified about the liability of tossing out advice to people they haven't personally examined who might later claim the advice was harmful.

«By now, you've spent a good portion of your life learning things about yourself, steering those things in different directions, hiding them, claiming new identities and any number of other adjustments we all make (consciously or not),» Kurtz writes.

Anything that the U.S. wants to add to the deal after the fact won't be acceptable to Iran, so talking about a «fix» is just a way to deflect criticism from the U.S. for unnecessarily and irrationally scrapping an agreement that achieves the thing that the Trump administration claims to want.

If you're concerned about small - business audit risk, you should be aware that the main thing that's likely to trigger an audit is claiming too many expenses.

Equifax's lawyers at Choate, Hall & Stewart had argued (among many other things) that the AG can't wield the state consumer protection law, which prohibits businesses from making false, deceptive or unfair claims, without showing anyone was harmed by Equifax's supposedly false assurances about data security.

Julie Gorte and Tim Smith offer a Harvard corporate law blog post claiming three things about SEC Rule 14a - 8:

One last thing that I think is worth talking about is the u / bashco's claim of vote manipulation.

Among other things, Hogan is claiming that Gawker violated the tort of «publication of private facts,» which prohibits people from publishing private facts about others, even if they are true, unless the facts are related to matters of «public concern.»

Claimed that protecting LGBT students was a local issue: «Local school boards can make their own rules about these things.»

The problem, it claims, is that the application depended on «the Steele dossier,» a document put together by former British spy Christopher Steele alleging deep ties between Trump and Russia (it's the source of, among other things, the «pee tape» rumors about Trump and Moscow prostitutes).

Shamgar, is your claim that, if the church was under greater persecution, we would all agree about these things because the people holding to one side of each of these debates aren't true believers, and so they would leave under persecution?

You keep claiming that you never said I stated anything about Christmas carols or pageants, yet you attempted to argue with me about those very things.

We're ho.nest about what we don't know, even when other people claim things they can't know and can't pr.ove.

How can we claim to follow someone we know through the words of someone who never met him and who didn't even have the benefit of the things written about him?

Maybe you should just shut the fuck up about shit you know absolutely nothing about, like black holes, where you show your ignorance for all to see and claim certainty about things you know nothing about.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

S.Lewis» «I am here trying to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: «I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept his claim to be God.»

Reading the account of how this professor expressed himself about the author's experience with the dying begs the question in my mind, - How many religious scholars and clergymen are as truly enlightened about life, death and the nature of things as they self - satisfyingly claim to be doctored in religion?

As for others in this stream, I find it fascinating you spend so much time reading about things you claim to not believe in.

Claiming to have knowledge about how things are and will be.

The claim was a simple thing to do in ancient times because scientifically ignorant people still did not know why the sun rose and set and why the seasons changed and why lightning and why thunder and why earthquakes and why disease and why just about anything... so people all thought that a god or gods controlled it all.

@Bill «As for others in this stream, I find it fascinating you spend so much time reading about things you claim to not believe in.»

No rational person, including atheists would claim we know every thing about the universe there is much to learn and will always be so.

Funny thing about your shallow American Christianity, whether here on this blog or out on the streets of the US... you look nothing like Jesus or the 1st C apostles (who all claimed that you should be like them and that you would do «greater things» than they did).

Penn Jillette makes this observation about god, claiming to be moral, doing things that would be considered highly immoral if done by people.

Getting a lot of people to believe and follow you b / c you claim you know all about those things and making a living off your «expertise» makes you a charlatan or a delusional egomaniac.

If this is a space for Julie (and Becky and Mojojules) to speak about how she was treated, as David claims in an earlier comment, then that is one thing.

(continued from 6/1/09) As little inclined as is Charles Taylor to connect the pre-ontological with the metaphysical, religious «experience» with cognitive assertions, he can not finally avoid making certain claims about the way things are, or at least the way human things are: We all see....

We claim that their books are not historically accurate, or the prophecies are not as precise as ours, but they claim such things about our Bible.

Because our basic theological understandings of grace include assent to the claim that the most beautiful and precious things in and about our lives are unearned and undeserved, themes of gift and gratitude sometimes seem overworked.

And megalomania would be claiming to know all about these things — spirits and gods — when you really have no hard evidence whatsoever to back up your claims.

It makes cognitive claims about the way things really are.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

He goes his way indifferent to the distribution and division of earthly goods, as one who has no possessions and desires none; he is not concerned for his daily bread, like the birds of the air; he does not trouble himself about house and home, as one who neither has nor seeks a shelter or a resting - place; he is not concerned to follow the dead to the grave; he does not turn his head to look at the things that usually claim the attention of men; he is not bound to any woman, so as to be charmed by her and desirous of pleasing her.

If you continue with such claims you'll get the fortress, if you are open to considering my request about attending to how you express then perhaps things can change in the way you see me engage.

The thing about making assertions is that they are often more effective when there is some tangible proof to support your claims.

That's the one thing I've long hated about atheists — they love to make bold statements and outlandish claims and to say it as though it's true.

Religion also makes a lot of claims about the physical world and why things happen, well within the purview of science, and all of them happen to be baseless.