Sentences with phrase «things about copyright»

Now you're suddenly talking about me missing things about copyright?

One of the nice things about copyrights is that securing such protection is fairly straightforward.

Not exact matches

For one thing, reprintings of Luther's pamphlets made money for printers, who did not have to worry about copyright law.

For one thing, how many people start to care about copyright and publishing freedom who hadn't given it a moment's thought before?

This is one of those things were you really need to worry about copyright infringement, though.

You'll not only learn exactly what you need to know about book design, but also about things specific to book publishing, such as title and copyright pages, ISBN and bar code, page count for printing, marketing considerations, plus how to choose the best type of printing for your book.

Joanna Penn: «The Self - Publisher's Legal Handbook», and there are some other ones, some other books about intellectual property and copyright and things... it's expensive to hire an attorney, right?

If you go learn something about what copyright actually is (hint: it's about making copies), then you'll have answers to many of your own questions, modulo certain weird things such as differences in the laws for audio vs. video.

Things on my To - Do List that didn't get done: Book order form sent to school for an upcoming school visit, registering copyright on February release, send science / nature books to a science review service, write on Book 3 of The Blue Planets series, and send emails about the winner of a book giveaway.

As the drama unfolded, many indie authors, including myself, learned several surprising things about the role retailers play in copyright disputes.

The important things to know about copyright are why it is necessary and how to secure it.

I'm especially intrigued to hear / read more from Samatha Holman, as in almost every recent conversation about the now and future of publishing, copyright law in the global and digital age is the one thing that no one knows enough about.

Now, as I mentioned to you, we've had Helen Sedwick on the show before talking about copyright and some of these things, but today we wanted to talk about estate planning because I saw an article that you wrote and it's something I'm really into.

One of the things I happen to know a decent amount about is the state of the law regarding copyright online (in the United States).

I haven't even said anything about the subject of copyright... That's rather judgmental of you to just assume things about me with zero basis.

The stunning thing about all of this is that most of the games in the spotlight here have been rereleased in Japan where apparently copyright laws are weaker, lawyers are smarter, or sales expectations are more realistic.

Honestly, all snark aside, I know / teach some youngsters who grew up in a «post-piracy» world (to the extent that they've grown up with things like the VC, Steam, and Netflix in the 00s, so downloading ROMs or TV shows or whatever doesn't hold enough allure / necessity to overcome wariness of getting in trouble or guilt about breaking copyright laws), but who have engaged with the fandom, talk of the game in hushed tones, and have been waiting with bated breath to play it.

Here, btw, is a roundup of previous Cariou v. Prince posts, including readings, reviews, and info about the book I made, Canal Zone Richard Prince YES RASTA: Selected Court Documents from Cariou v. Prince, which contains the transcript from Prince's amazing 7 - hour deposition in the case: Early days of THE BOOK: the five most ridiculous things about the Richard Prince copyright decision The Richard Prince decision?

The ability to take a couple of hours here or there and let people use the space... We've seen lots of new startups, lots of new community - minded projects in areas, things in the soft IP side of things, not just patents, but trademark, copyright, litigation types of matters that now when people think about those types of issues, the first thing that comes to mind is Dunlap Codding.

Regarding copyright and laws, one thing that on a personal level has bothered me since I found out about it, is how provincial governments will enact laws that incorporate by reference standards published by a non-governmental entity, so that to know and comply with the law (and there are penalties for non-compliance) requires purchasing a copy of the standard (e.g. electrical code, building code, etc.).

Ruth Carter: Yeah, I've been invited multiple years to speak at Phoenix Comic Con on things like comic book creator rights, fan art and fan fiction and copyright issues, those are the main things I get to talk about.

Maybe there's even more to it, or maybe it's different, but often the winning the copyright battle is not the problem they need solved, it's getting this thing, putting it behind them so they can keep going on their product, which is actually what they care about.

Piracy is about ethics, «copyright infringement» is about things that are illegal.

If your book is about the solar system say, then the diameter of Jupiter, the orbital period of Mars and the mass of the Sun are not things that are subject to copyright.

One thing all had in common was a desire to understand domestic and international copyright issues, Web 2.0 and other digital copyright issues, special library provisions and fair use / dealing, as well as educating others about copyright and licensing.

If you are worried about things like decompiling, then copyright by itself is unlikely to help you (due to exceptions for fair use / fair dealing: see, e.g., Sega Enterprises Ltd v Accolade Inc (1992) 977 F. 2d 1510) and so you would need to obtain the customer's agreement to a licence including a contractual promise not to decompile / etc.

I need to think more about the copyright licensing thing: after all, Google and the news sources are doing the work.

For one thing, that Vallance case looks to be about the conflicting values of open justice and personal privacy, not copyright.

The problem is that even under the U.S. copyright regime, considered to be the most robust, Ashley Madison would have to establish a good faith belief the things they are complaining about are actually copyrighted.

«There is a copyright lobby that is trying to work with governments to protect their property in a very aggressive fashion — almost in a very extremist fashion — where it's all about shutting websites down and putting people in jail for things that were being treated like parking tickets ten years ago.