Sentences with phrase «things about his score»

Okay, now that you feel better about yourself, let's clear up a few things about scores.

The funny thing about this score, is that I remember an article here on N4G discussing how bad the Spanish dub is and here we have a Spanish mag give it a great score.

Not exact matches

She develops the habit of memorizing sports scores off the Bloomberg ticker first thing in the morning, knowing that her bosses will ask her about them later in the day.

Your credit score is a good indicator of your overall creditworthiness, but it doesn't tell lenders about one important thing: your income.

Here's some basic things every adult should know about credit and their fico score.

One good thing about credit score is that they aren't permanent.

Here's the thing to know about credit scores.

One of the most common misconceptions about credit is that your credit score and credit report are basically the same thing.

The last thing you want is for the lender to know more about your qualifications than you do (such as your credit score).

The first thing we need to talk about is your credit score.

However, there are many things about credit scores that are not well understood, and here are 10 you may not be aware of.

Having said this, it must also be noted that there are scores upon scores of quotes from well - known and noted Calvinists who have said similar (and worse) things about those who are opposed to Calvinism.

Have read many stories about children killing their parents sisters brother in the same way as in the game specially that ice hooky thing... killing people with to score points and sure drugs with such games are behind most crimes...

We are 2 - 0 up with 10 men and every comment is about negative things like Kos being sent off and predictions about Liverpool scoring and winning their game but no congratulatory cheers for either of the 2 goals we have made.

It's not about how many points he's scoring or rebounds; those things are a factor.

obviously it was really stupid and frustrating what coquelin did which changed the game drastically, I didn't really ever believe they were gonna score Mert and Gabriel were very good but i don't want coquelin to change a thing about his game.

Seems Eriksen being cool about the whole thing, after all it shouldn't matter who scores as long as Spurs got the result.

Calling a player who regularly scored 30 + goals in the french league and hasn't even finished his first season, a donkey is unfair Fans said the same thing about Koscielny and Giroud when they came here.

Why so many articles about Wilshere?Is he a Messi or something we can't live without?Why is this guy so important for Arsenal, what special thinks he did for the team in the last 6 - 7 years?Just because he's a» darling» of supporters?Trying to secure a place in England's team at the expense of Arsenal's players?Trying to secure a good contract before exit?Wolcott's name come to mind, he was playing good only before contract renewal.At least he was scoring goals.Wilshere?Fe w goals in a 10 years Arsenal career.Where is the lost if this guy do the right thing and leave?we lose nothing.Good luck to you, Wilshere, but you are not good enough and are taking the place for a real midfielder (Max Meyer's name just popping up).

That is a stupid thing to say about a player who scored his first epl goal through nodding.

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.

The only negative thing that has been said about Giroud this term was his celebration when levelling the scores after being 3 - 0 down to Bournemouth in the Premier League, when the team should have been chasing that fourth and winning goal, but the sheer emotion of earning at least the point from such a deficit would have been hard to contain.

And the best thing about winning 13 of 14 games by two or more scores in 2013?

OK, Guys, here's the thing: Any even REASONABLE striker that had played as many games as OG this season would have scored about 30 goals.

He will wait in the area to score goals and when he does, he will say allot of nice things about Hodgson and his England teammates.

for example the bayern - madrid game robben was marked by two players almost all game he was neutralized by a disciplined marcelo does wenger even watch such games at home to learn a thing or two about tactics coz when we play bayern robben always scores the same exact goals against us with his left foot ffs, we shouldnt yearn for top 4 as we do nt deserve to be competing at that level honestly, sad to be writing this..

I understand that this is the starting lineup Ospina Debuchy — Per - Calum - Gibbs Arteta — Flamini Ox - Ramsey — Campbell Giroud The thing about this lineup that worries me is, who will create the scoring chances and where will the goals come from?

One of the most frustrating things about Arsenal's «score the perfect goal approach» is that we commit bodies forward, pass the ball around 50 times but inevitably give it away on the edge of the box setting up golden opportunities for the opponent to counter.

The win was the most important thing, of course, but any Arsenal fan worried about how late in the game we scored should relax and appreciate that we were good value for the win and should take heart that the team is back on track.

The worst thing about yesterday is that after Swansea scored their second it felt like everyone, from the fans to the players, knew it was the winning goal.

They've been there pretty much since the first time Thompson put on pads — he once scored 11 touchdowns as an 11 - year - old in Pop Warner — and they compensate for a body size that's one of the few things about him that's not eye - popping.

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

I am not a player who's going to beat three or four people and stick it in the top corner or go round tackling people like Roy Keane... People are making a big thing about how I don't score enough goals when that is not necessarily my first job in the team.

First let me laugh hahahahaha.Secondly, let me give credit where it is due and say that that was a great finish from Giroud.Thirdly, do you know that if Giroud did not score today he would have been criticized very badly you know why because he does a lot of things wrongly when he does not score but when he scores everyone just ignores.How many people were actually focused on him after he scored you would realize that he breaks up a lot of attacks.Its a pity peeps are not being honest about him he is French and he is a very nice guy so i understand however.Lastly, it has been about 3 seasons or so that he has been here and people are still debating over him.Make up your mind i made mine up from day one that he arrived and realized he was awful however great classy goal.

The worst thing about yesterday was that Giroud scored a hattrick thus cementing a reason for wenger as to why we DO NT need a striker.

It really is one of the greatest goals ever scored, but the most impressive thing about it is that it was — arguably — not even the magnum opus of his astonishingly captivating oeuvre.

S&P +, so if you're keeping score at home, that must say impressive things about ACC defenses.

He is not a quality striker because he makes a lot of mistakes in his game.The fact that he scores 20 goals does not mean he is a quality back up striker.It is one thing to be a goal scorer and another thing to be a good or average player.Goal scoring is a very important aspect of a player but not the only aspect.Trust me you can score 20 goals in all competitions and still be average.If Chamakh, Gervinho and all the so called flops scored this same goals they would still have been considered not good enough for Arsenal.His game is just not good enough and I for one believe even if no one believes that we can get a backup striker who is better than him and also a top centre forward.Its all about mentality and willingness.Forget his goals and look at his game or else you'll force me to bring up strikers in the world who have scored his same goals and are even considered terrible.

It can't be coincidence that so many people come on this site and say the same thing about needing a better cf because giroud is not good enough to score 20 prem goals in a season.

So although Chelsea got lucky again when Hull did not get a clear penalty to level the game, Spurs and Liverpool were frankly awful, Man City's defence is leakier than a sieve and United still huff and puff without scoring enough, the media find things about Arsenal to criticise.

There's many things I like about Giroud (work rate, passion) but he takes 5/6 chances to actually score.

I remember even our own King Henry and one of the things i LOVED about him was that look in his eyes, not desperate, not sad, not happy, just a look that said... i missed this one but i will score son and that he never gave up,

SEE MORE Five Things Liverpool & Chelsea Fans Need To Know About January Transfer Target Mauro Icardi Ranking Premier League's Top Six By Goals Scored By New Signings: Chelsea & Arsenal Benefitting Most Premier League's Best Defensive Records, With Chelsea Only 2nd, Manchester United 5th

Off topic we have Welbeck the striker that never score and some Arsenal fans still think he's a good but because he works hard no he's a flipping striker his main objective is to score goals, Giroud without having half the pace Welbeck has will always be a better striker than Welbeck and the sad thing about buying Welbeck is that I don't see another striker coming in until Wenger leaves.

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

He's on a loaded North Carolina team that might not need him to do anything but score, but you could say the same thing about Kidd - Gilchrist at Kentucky.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Quality is not all about goals or stats you know.If it was a lot of Arsenal players would have been sold and many players would not even be regarded.People need to look at the bigger picture.He scored 16 goals last two season as the starting CF.You and I know that based on the chances he gets he should've been doing better.The guy is not even a clinical player from what we watch yet people will always deny that fact.The only case people make up for Giroud is his goals.They can't even talk about his quality on the ball and others because it's non existent.He was part of the reason why Arsenal couldn't win the trophy in 15/16 season.It's a shame we are compromising and refuse to state things the way they are.Even if Giroud scores 40 goals in the EPL qualoty wise he's still average.

The good thing about it is that he always get himself in the scoring position, with more games he will get better.

And as will happen with these things when handicaps and net scores are involved, the subject of sandbagging was tossed about with Fitz.