A blog about
all things academic law libraries and legal research.
Not exact matches
Conversely, the
law and economics movement (yes, it's a political platform as much as an
academic one) takes a decidedly dim view of government and regulation, treating those
things as sand in the gears of the market.
In the debate over the future of the No Child Left Behind Act, policymakers, educators, and researchers seem to agree on one
thing: The federal
law's accountability system should be rewritten so it rewards or sanctions schools on the basis of students»
academic growth.
The only
things off limits are
laws on
academic and financial accountability, student assessment and district governance.
Letting other people see your data as required by the
Law and
academic convention would be another Good
Thing.
It is a form of discrimination, and schools like Osgoode have been able to alleviate some of the effects of this by looking past the LSAT scores to encapsulate an assessment of their applicants by looking at
things like community involvement
academic performance, and challenges faced by certain minorities in applying to
Law school.
«[M] ost of what people take the time to write is legal analysis,
law current events, opinions about these
things, etc.» Again, he is talking about
academics, but the point is true of a range of legal blogs.
Among those who present themselves with specific
academic or professional backgrounds, such as a
law degree, an accountancy or tax qualification or who are legally qualified, occasionally one hears that the reason that they have applied is that
things haven't worked out well in the pursuit of some other career path.
Three
things strike me about international
law in the work of a government lawyer today: first, it is all - pervasive; second, the questions that arise and the context in which they are considered are extraordinarily complex; and, finally, I am struck by the intense scrutiny these legal issues are subjected to by states and courts around the world,
academics and the public.
Among other
things, the Act provides for the establishment of by -
laws, including by -
laws that relate to
academic requirements and experience for registration, member conduct and standards of practice.
At a moment at which there are many serious criticisms of liberalism and / or questions about its future, combined with substantial unanimity among legal
academics about various progressive values (as seen, to be clear, through an establishment lens) and the routine invocation in current scholarly and public writing of
things like «rule of
law,» faith in judicial review, and so on, there is a lot of room for interesting and valuable work questioning those assumptions and premises.
One of my jobs at Osgoode Hall
Law School over the past few years has been to mediate between the IT people and the faculty, and so I know a little about this vexed meeting of minds, but I'd imagined that somehow
things would be better worked out in the professional context of practice than in the sometimes quirky
academic world.
The second edition of my
Academic Legal Writing textbook has just been published, and it now covers how to get onto
law review — with, among other
things, lots of tips on write - on competitions — as well as how to write the student articles that
law review members (and others) write.
It's one
thing to talk about
law practice management topics in a podcast, but it's another one to see podcasts as a medium for credible commentary or even as a source of
law (at least if one can imagine that
academics providing long - form commentary about Québec civil
law in a podcast would be creating «doctrine»).
And, these disclosures should occur not just for
things like congressional testimony but in other outlets for
academics» work — including
law reviews and, yes, even blogs.