«I feel it confirms what I've said all along, that we handled
things in a legal manner, ethically appropriate manner, throughout,» de Blasio said.
Not exact matches
«We are very, very careful about doing
things in a
legal and appropriate
manner,» he said on April 11, 2016.
Client comments as published
in the
legal directories and guides include: «A first - class mind and clearly a silk
in the making»; «a QC
in waiting»; «a very bright, uber - responsive, rising star»; «formidable advocate able to stand up to commercial silks and senior juniors»; «an extremely impressive and effective advocate who gets on top of
things extremely fast and is quick on his feet»; «complete grasp of all current developments, strategic input and forceful yet polite cross-examination»; «undoubted star junior who goes well past the extra mile
in preparing his cases»; «brilliant, completely committed to the brief; a great all - rounder»; «intellectually very strong»; «very sharp and to the point»; «ringing endorsements from the market»; «impressive and knows his stuff»; «razor sharp
legal skills»; «comes up with extremely clever points» with an ability «to handle hearings with utmost self - possession and confidence and produce some first - class advocacy»; «a thorough and thoughtful advocate who has an agreeable but tough courtroom
manner»; «very proactive and, once instructed, takes control of a case and pushes it forward to the advantage of the client»; «has the ability to sift through complex
legal problems, and present practical
legal solutions that not only win you the battles, but also the war»; «very commercial and savvy»; «infectious passion for the law»; «his commitment to his work is outstanding»; «relentless energy and precise attention to detail make him invaluable.»
Likewise,
legal technology, although burgeoning
in recent years, tends to provide «bright shiny new
things» that are not always consistent with the way lawyers practice law and the
manner in which clients expect
legal services to be delivered.
Apparently the only
thing that has changed since its initial vote against the Declaration is Canada's confidence that ``... Canada can interpret the principles expressed
in the Declaration
in a
manner that is consistent with our Constitution and
legal framework.»
If something unexpected happens, whether property -,
legal - or injury - related, your coverage should step
in and handle
things in a timely and efficient
manner.
This does not mean that negotiating parties are free to use deception or to negotiate
in bad - faith
manner: such conduct can give rise to claims of negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation, which
in turn will spark a
legal claim by the injured party for damages, among other
things.