Sentences with phrase «things in the creators»

At Google I / O, the company revealed a new Super Chat APIs — «Super Chat» being YouTube's term for donations — that allows your digital dollars to do things in the creator's real world studio, such as shutting off lights or enabling a drone or whatnot.
As with all new things in the Creators Update, we thought it'd be a good idea to give you a good look at the new setup experience.
Windows Mixed Reality is a thing in the Creators Update, but as of right now it's mostly just for developers.

Not exact matches

Creator Benjamin Redford says he's most interested in rewarding people in the physical world for things that happens in their virtual worlds.
More from Benjamin P. Hardy: One thing separates creators from consumers The 13 - minute definitive guide to living your dreams How to learn in 2 days what normally takes 6 months
What to consider before hiring a writer: Although there are 10 things that you should consider before you hire a content creator, the most important thing is making sure that your ideal writer is knowledgeable in your industry and can create great content.
According to Jackson Palmer, the creator of the currency, the people who invested in DogeCoin were usually first - timers trying out how things work in the world of altcoins.
But it is one thing to state that all human beings have some access to God's law within and through human nature, quite another to expect natural law theories based on reason alone to persuade others about contested moral issues in a context where such theories are stripped of their foundations in God as creator, lawgiver, and judge.
I FULLY believe in a creator and spiritual reality, but I think the GREAT creator, not the various imposters (Including the dieties of JEws, Muslims and Christians) who have fun watching us kill each other over theological syntax disagreements, has MUCH better things to do than have personal conversations with any of us, dumb blondes included.
As Albert the Great, medieval philosopher, scientist, and teacher of Thomas Aquinas, remarked: «In the natural sciences we do not investigate how God the Creator operates according to His will and uses miracles to show His power, but rather what may happen in natural things on the ground of the causes inherent in nature» (In I De caelo et mundo, tIn the natural sciences we do not investigate how God the Creator operates according to His will and uses miracles to show His power, but rather what may happen in natural things on the ground of the causes inherent in nature» (In I De caelo et mundo, tin natural things on the ground of the causes inherent in nature» (In I De caelo et mundo, tin nature» (In I De caelo et mundo, tIn I De caelo et mundo, tr.
IF you were to look at creation it - self and how complex and in order things are surely after a few days of thinking about it you would have to say there must have be a creator in all of this stuff going on??? there is to much out there to say it all happened by chance or accicedent... you do nt have to go past the moon or the nearest planet to see what im talking aobut i will pray that God will reveal him self to you and you too can see what im talking aobut... you can emial me if you like randytherealtor7 at yahoo com
There is no such thing as a creator in evolution, who are gods father and grandfather, do they have names?
I personally like to live in harmony with the creator, but all to often choose things that are not merely against the Kingdom but not even good for me.
And those who have the privilege of being selected to go to heaven, serve in an official capacity as «kings and priests» (Rev 1:6), not as equals to God, but as 144,000 individuals who recognize that God, whose name is Jehovah, is the Grand Creator of all the universe, with these ones casting their crowns before God's throne, saying: «You are worthy, Jehovah, even our God, to receive the glory and the honor and the power, because you created all things, and because of your will they existed and were created.»
The Almighty, The Creator of all things in the Universe, doesn't need puny mankind to handle His business, or murder anyone.
Science is a medium, not a source, but a process to reach truth absolute of a matter, but hindu's ignorant assume it to be the source, to justify their hinduism, absurdity called evolution, truth absolute is the God, and creator of every one and every thing in existence.
Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;
20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four - footed beasts, and creeping things.24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.
Here's the funny thing... If we (those believing in a Creator) are wrong, then we are just «worm - food» and nobody is the worse for the wear... BUT, if we are right, and God created the universe and the Bible is truth... then I really feel sorrow for those who think that we are the end product of a «big bang» or evolved from monkeys... just sayin»...
You said, «Here's the funny thing... If we (those believing in a Creator) are wrong, then we are just «worm - food» and nobody is the worse for the wear... BUT, if we are right, and God created the universe and the Bible is truth... then I really feel sorrow for those who think that we are the end product of a «big bang» or evolved from monkeys... just sayin»...»
your right marriage has nothing to do with religion But it does have everything to do with God who is the Creator of all things both heaven and earth and all that is in them.
By what we see around us in the creation, for our Creator, made us to see in color, not just black and white, to have a series of senses that allow us to thoroughly enjoy life, such as the capacity to feel very minute things with our fingertips.
I am only an ordinary human being nor an Angel nor a Prophet... am only quoting what my Holy Book has told me that GOD the Only was the creator of every thing in the universe... But to ask me who created GOD to me is unsensable question..
«God within my inward things» is not equivalent to «God in me» for Augustine, for God is always first of all creator of the whole world and Lord of all history.
It expands upon what this means: the Father (compassion, love, concern, care); Almighty (the Ultimate, all - powerful, over all, in all, through all things, the Supreme); creator of heaven and earth (the source, the infinite unfathomable ground zero).
Either the God of the Lord Jesus Christ truly is the creator of heaven and earth, in which case finally everything from the providential hand of «I am the Lord, and there is no form light and create darkness, weal and woe, I am the Lord, who does all these things» (Isa.
If in worship the church stands in the presence of God, then in praising God we meet the Creator — no small thing.
And if there was no Creator and things just happened to come together, then is it likely they also just happened to develope into intellect or emotion or love... things that exist but are not tangle in a lab?.
But, one can certainly know this, that YHWH, the Creator, the true name, not Lord, or God «look it up» knows all, and allowed what the liars has done to this book to magnify Himself in His day of return, as He tells us in Isaiah 34 vs. 8 of the controversy of this whole thing, along with the profaning of His name in Ezekiel 36 vs. 22,23.
The creative itch was placed in the creature by the creator, and so long as we remain human we shall be working with him, and he with us, to preserve and to redeem things and situations and people.
and being the Creator of all things... youre lacking in info
They also like to claim that complexity is a sign of a creator while ignoring that in order to create the universe god would have to be the most complex thing in existence.
«Our father, who is in heaven, Harold be thy name...» God, Allah, Jehovah, YHWH, the Tao, Creator, G - d, «that which can not be named», Brahma, «Harold», all refer to the same thing.
We find in Scripture a God who is actively present not only as the creator but also the sustainer of this order of things.
The only difference is that the condition to enter Paradise is different in Islam as compared to what you are saying and that is Belief in one True God i.e. the Creator of all things instead of believing in the creation itself like Jesus.
In a passage of prophetic significance, he writes: «A man who sets out to make himself up is taking on the Creator's role, according to one way of seeing things; he's unnatural, a blasphemer, an abomination of abominations.
Except you know they exist, It is the same with God the creator, faith is the most important thing in a persons life, for without faith.
The distinctive thing about human beings is that they are meant to be partners in His covenant and to represent the Creator, in the person of His Son, to the rest of creation.
Interesting: Your statement: «The belief that the unfathomable intricacies of every living thing on our earth formed themselves completely at random seems just as fantastical to me as believing in a Creator» is not an accurate reflection of what evolutionary theory posits.
It is not a bit of a stretch but an act of total blind faith to believe in Evolution Dan, in fact it take more faith to believe in that than in an all knowing, all powerful creator God who said I created all things.
The only thing evolutionists don't believe is in a Creator and that Humans were created independently of other living creatures....
«The belief that the unfathomable intricacies of every living thing on our earth formed themselves completely at random seems just as fantastical to me as believing in a Creator»
All of theses guys are on record and in print in defense of their faith and acceptance in a creator of all living things.
I thought Mormons believed in many gods and that Jehovah is one of many who guide humanity, but is not actually the Supreme Being, meaning the total creator of all things.
However, since you brought the topic up, the Bible states that Jesus is, in fact, the Creator of all things.
I spoke to them about the only one God the creator of all things, about the nothingness of idols, the sin of idolatry, sin in general, and its terrible consequences after death and of the only means of salvation provided for all mankind in Christ.
The ascetic is freed from the slavery to things by seeing in everything the Creator of all things.
There is a Creator that transcends time and He has started in motion all things for His purpose.
Throughout this post we've seen all manner of TAG (Kalam's Cosmological Argument, Argument from Design, Argument from Complexity, Argument from Morality, Logical Absolutes... etc.) every one of which has been thoroughly refuted and at best would indicate only an extremely unlikely yet possible indifferent deist creator who set things in motion.
In the generation before Scotus, Thomas Aquinas argued that, although we have to use the same language to talk about both creation and its Creator, the things we say can only be true analogously in the two caseIn the generation before Scotus, Thomas Aquinas argued that, although we have to use the same language to talk about both creation and its Creator, the things we say can only be true analogously in the two casein the two cases.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z