Sentences with phrase «think creationism»

You did not get a very good education with your degrees then if you think creationism belongs in a science class.

Additionally, I don't think any creationism should be included in a SCIENCE class.

And what if your kids learn both and say «Mom, I think Creationism is stupid, I'm learning evolution.»

Amazing... taught to hate and critique evolution by a pastor, and you think Creationism makes more sense.

Unfortunately I think the problem is that we try to see things too black and white... I think creationism is real in the context of evolution.

The point isn't to argue the merits of your unprovable diety, but whether our children should be confused into thinking creationism is science.

Hard to miss someone who thinks creationism is still taught in every school.

The only worry might be that Topher awhile ago said he thought creationism was taught in schools and his stance on LGBT.

Her academic credentials are dubious, she is phenomenally bad at math, she is verbally inept, and she is so ignorant of hard science that she thinks Creationism should be taught in schools.

48 % of people in Britain thought the theory of evolution best described their view, 17 % thought intelligent design best described their view and, startlingly, 22 % of British people thought creationism best described their view.

Not exact matches

I think more effort and resources would be more effectively and more critically placed into keeping our government secular, keeping Creationism out of the science class, and religious fundamentalism away from interfering with women's reproductive choices — just to name a few priorities.

Young earth creationism is ludicrous and young earth creationists, most of whom live in the United States and are fundamentalist Christians, are the laughing stock of the thinking world.

i am sorry that we think you are silly for believing in creationism.

I agree with you but would advise caution with the statement «I don't think Christians do themselves any favors...» since many would interpret that to mean that believing in creationism is part of Christianity.

I don't belive in creationism, but I do think ID has true merit.

I want everyone who acts as if this type of thinking is inconsequential to consider this: To accept creationism requires a complete disregard for carefully and elegantly researched scientific evidence, and 40 + % of people in America do so.

I think it would be very beneficial for all children to learn about the issues regarding evolution and creationism.

So it rightly criticises creationism and «intelligent design», yet it rarely challenges the mystifications of deep environmentalist thinking, such as Gaia theory, or the numerous varieties of Eastern mysticism that are so fashionable in Hollywood.

I think Christians who are stuck on Creationism should think about this: Jesus said «I am the truth.»

I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide examples of lay persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.

Religion is one lie after another: the lie of original sin, the lie of eternal life, the lie of hell, the lie of answered prayer, the lie that life can have no meaning without religion, the lie that religion is the source of morality, the lie of creationism, the lie of a spy - in - the - sky who hears your every word and reads your every thought.

Dalahast; you said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide examples of lay persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.»

In the case of creationism, for example, scientific evidence now exists which contradicts directly with the creation myth (unless one thinks of the creation story as being an allegory or something like that).

I think Doris» post was meant to show just how laughable creationism is.

And I think that brings us back to Bostontola's original point: When lay people debate science (like evolution vs. creationism), that should raise red flags.

@SeanNJ, I would think the meetings would primarily be about educating the public on the separation of church and state and opposing religious encroachment on the public / government arena, e.g. creationism / ID in the science classroom, ten commandments displays in government buildings, school sanctioned prayer or religious activities.

My favorite bumper stickers: «Don't pray in my school and I won't think in your church» and «You can teach creationism in my school if I can teach evolution in your church.»

What's ironic is that it is Keith that is dragging his children under by cramming their heads with mythical thinking, creationism, and a whole host of illogical beliefs.

The terminology favored by the movement is itself indicative of the degree to which modern scientific questions and secular modes of thought dominate the discussion of creation: Bible science, creation science, scientific creationism, creation research, origins research.

You seem to think god allows» for everything and if that is so why did nt he just create this in the first place... evolution or «allowed» creationism... one or the other but not both... why?

You don't have to go very far down that road before you start thinking about creation science or scientific creationism, or get involved in school board squabbles about whether Genesis should be taught alongside of evolution in high school biology courses.

The difference id that evolution is based on facts (fosils, prior extinct animals, the evolution before our very eyes with microbes, etc) and creationism has absolutely no evidence whatsover and is based on fantasy and magical thinking and has no place in science classes.

I think some uninformed people commenting here assume that all of Christianity agree with creationism and that our position is that it should be taught in the public schools and that is not correct.

You only call Creationism a theory because you have wishful thinking that the world is the world described in the bible.

Now, as to the matter of teaching creationism in schools, I don't think it's a particularly good idea however, I also think that Darwinism needs to be taught as a theory and that children need to be taught about the strengths and weaknesses of the theory.

And from what I understand Creationism is stronger here in the US than elsewhere but I have read about variant versions in other countries so I don't think it is correct to say that it is just a US phenomena.

I don't normally think that dictionary definitions bring much to any argument, but in the case of creationism vs evolution, its shameful that one side can't even be bothered to know the meaning of the word that they're using in highly semantic arguments.

Have we ever thought that maybe the Creationism does have evidence, but our science has not «evolved» enough to identify it?

In the same way that Bill says kids should not be taught exclusively creationism, I don't think kids should be taught just evolutionism.

However teaching creationism in public schools as a scientific reality on the order of evolution damages kid's critical thinking.

To believe in creationism today, however, is truly absurd, and shows that some people will believe in anything if they think it means they will live forever.

I think it's fine to show problems with evolutionary theory, HOWEVER, we can not teach creationism.

Evolution and creationism should go hand in hand because for the life of me (and based on scientific thought), I can not see how something can come from nothing... energy never dies, it is only transfered to something else.

For him to say believing in creationism will block or hinder our chidren from making huge or amazing discoveries is small thinking.

No one who believes in evolution thinks that things just appeared, that's called creationism.

If you think this is an exaggeration, just try to discuss creationism with you and they will laugh at you, deride your intellect and refuse to listen to the evidence you present).

There is the jab about evolution where when creationism is mentioned it is cast in a negative «not truth» light with the exception of a minority that hang onto such antiquated religious thoughts That is not what the const - itution intended.

I think that we should teach creationism too.

And it is ironic that Mohler, who has been a tireless advocate for young earth creationism on the basis that «the straightforward and direct reading of [Genesis] describes seven 24 - hour days,» does not seem to think that a straightforward and direct reading of Jesus» teachings regarding violence is necessary.

Honey Badger wrote,» I think that we should teach creationism too.