Sentences with phrase «think justices of the supreme court»

Just think Justices of the Supreme Court and Panels of Justices.

Not exact matches

What's important is that, when Donald Trump was asked what he thought the Supreme Court should do with its power, the first thing he decided was important to address was that the justices on the court should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she waCourt should do with its power, the first thing he decided was important to address was that the justices on the court should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she wacourt should be nice to him — and that he had made one of them apologize to him when she wasn't.

To try and re-elect an Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice who has proven in the past that he thinks his opinion is above the laws of the state and has already been removed from the office once for his actions is disgraceful.

Judge Graham expresses in his decision thoughts that by now should be quite familiar to our readers: «The Justices of the Supreme Court disagree among themselves on the proper role of religion in public life and the extent of the Court's authority to decide these issues under the Establishment Clause.

On this much, most agree: That the Supreme Court took McDonnell's case means a good number of the justices think that U.S. public corruption law is worth examining.

«If you don't believe this election is important, if you think you can sit it out, take a moment to think about the Supreme Court justices that Donald Trump would nominate and what that would mean to civil liberties, equal rights and the future of our country,» Sanders said.

The editorial went on to note that Collins» bill runs counter to the thoughts of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative icon who made clear in his ruling that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to bear arms that states can put limits on that right.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she doesn't want to think about the possibility of Trump winning the White House, and she predicts the next president — «whoever she will be» — will have a few appointments to make to the Supreme Court.

Using the greatest hits blueprint, one would think any big - time film treatment about Thurgood Marshall, an American hero for racial equality, has to include Brown vs. Board of Education and his ascension to become the first black U.S. Supreme Court justice.

Starting up the midweek shoesaw of highlights from Gamasutra and our other sites, there's a pretty large amount of neatstuff already - headed off by retired Supreme Court Justice O'Connor (pictured) frontlining an educational game about American courts (we'd like to think she'll be a bit like an EA Sports cover - star), and Insomniac revealing new East - Coast digs.

As I look out over the empty plains of South Dakota and think many fools believe that the bad breath of a Supreme Court Justice can warm up the earth, catastrophy will loom over us all.

On top of that and lot's of other problems here, three of the Supreme Court justices think it's A-OK not to positively identify people who want to vote in our elections.

No matter what your politics, I think a calculated review of her resume and qualifications indicate that Harriet Miers should never have been nominated to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the U.S. Supreme Court — or should never have accepted.

Beverley McLachlin, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, has stated it in this manner: «If you're the only one who can provide a fundamental social need from which you benefit, I think it follows that you have to provide it.»

I think that the Supreme Court of Canada has got it just about right, independently contributing to justice and democracy, while avoiding hubris and exercising restraint.

If indeed our our Supreme Court is more influential in foreign jurisprudence than its U.S. counterpart, it is flattering to think that this is a result of greater merit — as Justice Ginsberg seems to imply — but hard not to think that our participation in Commonwealth jurisprudence hasn't at least as much to do with it.

Remarkably, it has been nearly half a century since the Supreme Court has even a single Justice with experience as a federal district court judge, and I think the Justices» confusing work in various arenas (especially sentencing) reflects a lack of practical district court wiCourt has even a single Justice with experience as a federal district court judge, and I think the Justices» confusing work in various arenas (especially sentencing) reflects a lack of practical district court wicourt judge, and I think the Justices» confusing work in various arenas (especially sentencing) reflects a lack of practical district court wicourt wisdom.

If you think this is odd, you are not alone»... one judge referring to the laws as «Alice - in - Wonderland» and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court referred to the situation as «bizarre»».

So I thought I'd share some of tips for success put forth by the group that included former chief justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Margaret Marshall, Richard Quimby, a litigation partner at Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan, and Boston Bar Association president Paul Dacier, who is also executive vice president and general counsel of EMC Corp..

This is also the sort of question that the Justices would likely think ought to be decided by the Supreme Court; it's one thing to have different views in different circuits on some technical question, and another to have different views on whether an Amendment in the Bill of Rights secures an individual right or not.

Ian Binnie, former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, stated, «You always have to consider in these cases the position of the losing party; are they going to go away from court thinking they got the raw deal because the other side had a former jCourt of Canada, stated, «You always have to consider in these cases the position of the losing party; are they going to go away from court thinking they got the raw deal because the other side had a former jcourt thinking they got the raw deal because the other side had a former judge?

Without knowing it, I think Justice Breyer expressed very well the concept of «deference as respect» developed by David Dyzenhaus in a 1997 essay (and consistently misapplied by the Supreme Court of Canada and other Canadian courts).

Iowa Supreme Court Chief Justice Says Court Funding Cuts Could Hamper Business Environment: Citing Iowa's drop in ILR's 2017 Lawsuit Climate Survey, the chief justice of the Iowa Supreme Court said proposed funding cuts to Iowa's courts will give the state's legal environment a «black eye» in the view of «businesses that might be thinking of expanding here.Justice Says Court Funding Cuts Could Hamper Business Environment: Citing Iowa's drop in ILR's 2017 Lawsuit Climate Survey, the chief justice of the Iowa Supreme Court said proposed funding cuts to Iowa's courts will give the state's legal environment a «black eye» in the view of «businesses that might be thinking of expanding here.justice of the Iowa Supreme Court said proposed funding cuts to Iowa's courts will give the state's legal environment a «black eye» in the view of «businesses that might be thinking of expanding here.»

Further to that, among the tweaks I'm considering for my first - year Constitutional Law course this spring is an idea I'd «borrow» from Stephen Colbert — apropos his «Better Know a District» segments on The Colbert Report, I thought it might be fun to begin each of my 39 class sessions by giving the students background and biographical information on a specific Supreme Court Justice who's particularly relevant to that day's class (via Powerpoint — duh!).

Let's start with the obvious: I think Rick Hasen is exactly right to suggest that such a move by the lefties is actually a «relative victory» for campaign finance reformers, given the extent to which» [t] aking the case would have been an opportunity for the majority of Supreme Court justices to make things worse [from the reformers» perspective], such as by suggesting that limits on direct contributions to candidates are unconstitutional.»

The discussion of the last two cases in the Copyright Pentalogy (Entertainment Software Association v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada and Alberta (Education) v Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright)-RRB- provided interesting insight into the thoughts and opinions of the Supreme Court Justice (it should be noted that Justice Rothstein wrote dissenting opinions in each of the cases).

On November 27th, 2012, IP Osgoode was pleased to welcome The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada to share his thoughts with respect to the 5 important copyright cases (known as the «Copyright Pentalogy») that he took part in deciding earlier this year.

«In relation to the considerations that serve to distinguish a policy decision from the operational decision, I continue to think that the four considerations referred to by Madam Justice McLachlin, as the trial judge in Just, are helpful and are unaffected by the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in that case.

Chairman Chuck Grassley of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who recently suggested that any Supreme Court justice who was thinking about retiring do so right f**king now, claims that he won't hold any hearings or votes for a Supreme Court nominee during the lead - up to the 2020 election [Bloomberg]

I think Chief Justice [Joseph] Kennedy should be asked: «As chief justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, do you have any problem with the fact that you don't have any black or aboriginal judges in your whole building, yet you sentence black and aboriginal people all thJustice [Joseph] Kennedy should be asked: «As chief justice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, do you have any problem with the fact that you don't have any black or aboriginal judges in your whole building, yet you sentence black and aboriginal people all thjustice of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, do you have any problem with the fact that you don't have any black or aboriginal judges in your whole building, yet you sentence black and aboriginal people all the time?

«I think Mr. Justice Rothstein's decision on behalf of the Supreme Court is a well written and sensible judgment,» he says.

As Sakej Henderson, a Mi» k Maq man and professor of law at the University of Saskatchewan, among others, has observed, there is very little reason to think that the practices that appear most integral to those outside the culture, e.g., Supreme Court (or other) justices and those who view their culture from the inside.

Also read: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Deat at age 79 Jamie Dimon: Bitcoin Going Nowhere «Bitcoin the currency, I think, is going to go nowhere,» Dimon said, «And it's not because of anything to do