Sentences with phrase «think np»

I do not think the NP is checking me often enough for just starting out on the meds.

I think NP got a raw deal during the SD game and would be very surprised if it happened again.

This is the sort of thing I find frustrating and which I think NP does also, and very possibly it is more extreme than what you have encountered.

I think NP has already shown he is fine with fear and willing to sacrifice security in a huge way — in ways perhaps you have never risked.

But I think NP has no such intention.

I think NP has a vision of oppression that is reified into some invisible hand that hammers down on the folks who might cross the line of various convention.

I think NP is right in claiming that these all emerge from our effort to pidgeon hole God.

I think NP really tries to demonstrate God's goodness, and I think ultimately that will bring the only type of repentance that really matters, the real turning of the heart and not a phoney attempt to live by a list of dos and do nt's (well, let's face it, that list has only don'ts, not one seems to pay attention to the «dos» anymore).

I don't think NP suggests that he isn't exploring, dismantling, erecting, prodding, or setting up boundaries... I think at the heart of the issue is the intention behind it (as far as we are able to access our own or others intentions, why often remain a partial mystery).

I don't think NP is trying to erect solid fences (from my limited perspective) but I do think he wants to challenge the status quo.

What's hard, is trying to push through this and find a way to dialogue which is what I think NP is getting at... and what I have been learning a lot about lately, partly thanks to this blog: — RRB -.

WHY: Because I don't think NP would NOT put it in a box and send it to Jesus as a present as some of his best use of the talent that God has given him.

I would have thought NP would have caught that and not used it to stir the big pot!

I didn't even see EarthBound, so I thought NP mixed it up.

Not exact matches

NP, I too don't think we can compare homosexuality to obesity or (especially) tax - evasion.

I think you will see similar «centering» in Sabio, Gary, Adam, NP, and others that consistently post here.

NP, why would you think it's good for a Muslim, who believes that the Jew is wrong, to help the Jew build a place of worship if the Muslim believes that lies are going to be spread there?

See Fishon, NP is not promoting â $ ˜divisivenessâ $ ™ as is dialogued about in the Romans 16 passage you used as a proof - text â $ «just as I had thought.

I think the humility that NP is talking about here has to recognize that Billy Graham had to say «no» to the segregated seating at one of his crusades.

People like NP (and myself, when I started my long journey away from the beliefs I once held so strongly) have begun to wrestle back control of those areas of the thought process that were off limits for so long.

I think the argument that you (NP) can not change the church from the outside is a legitimate one, albeit one most of those leaving comments might not agree with.

I thought what NP was quoting was the experience of being beyond one's convention.

Having said that, a review of all my posts on np's Z - theory will reveal that I think it's great, very insightful and loaded with truth and revelation.

And worse than delusional, believing you have access to the thoughts of an all - knowing being is pernicious (and NP said he agreed — if I understood him correctly).

David (NP)... I think you are far from stagnant.

I hope NP didn't take my sharing of a thought as an accusation.

But they may hear np's Z - theory and it will get them thinking.

I think this is the point NP is making — not that he doesn't believe there is proofs — but that we can not actually give any when asked (and this is based on what we think).

When NP says «I think the z - theory is a unifying theory.

I was thinking the other day, «why doesn't NP's work appear on cards».

So for those who think this is cause to rebuke NP, consider yourselves rebuked.

Hey NP, I think your use of the word «freedom» takes some of us to «in those days there was no king in Israel so everyone did what was right in their own eyes.»

New to this site, but encouraged by the general thrust of NP and his attempts to move away from the wrong thoughts and ideas of the institutions.

Again, I thought that NP was simply being sarcastic when he made that statement about a pastor controlling his congregation.

I think what NP said above seems the most likely.

Denise, I think the consensus is here — if consensus is allowed in terms of being on their own journeys, even NP is leery of all beliefs — anyways, the consensus arrived at by Contextual epistemology, not Foundational, as it can not be seen as a given, is that Jesus did not even exist, so hence he can not even be a failed apocalyptic prophet.

NP: I think it's interesting that sometimes people worry that you aren't concerned enough with building up the church, because you don't provide positive models of what the church should be, and then other people insist that you contradict yourself in criticizing vision because you do have a vision of what the church should be.

NP said: «There are vast numbers of people like them, like me, who desire community that respects and embraces a spiritual component but entirely free of manipulation, control, exploitation, expectations and confined thought and belief.

NP, by the way, I think you are doing an exceptional job of creating a community as free of these things as possible.

Actually, np, I'm feeling very strongly about this because of my personal experience of trying to manage hurt: I think you are disrespecting yourself by requiring nothing of others.

This post by NP has fed into the thought process started by this fictional conversation.

I believe he has a very different point of view on things from NP, but I think he is just trying to understand where np is coming froNP, but I think he is just trying to understand where np is coming fronp is coming from.

I like your way of thinking / being NP.

if i get a caution from np for my behaviour i'll certainly think again, but i take the pitch of his posts as a guide and i pitch my responses accordingly.

NP, I think I agree that Jesus would not stop «free - thinking;» however, he tries to help the «free - thinker» to think clearly and correctly.

I am also an ex-Christian Atheist, but I still think it is possible to stay religious in a healthy way after purging many of the destructive things NP is undertaking in his many fine posts.

Wow NP, I hadn't thought of it like that, but you're right — funny and purely coincidental!

Hello NP I have a question / topic for discussion — it's probably something you've already addressed... but just in case... who do you think church is for?

*** I didn't write Romans, Paul did, so I go by his words, not what NP THINKS.

NP — just on your last comment — if that is not the pirmary mission of the church, what do you think is?