Sentences with phrase «think ot»

I've since seen the film, and would recommend it to anyone with an interest in food and farming - come to think ot it, I'd recommend it to anyone who eats.

I also think our OT's could be upgraded from.

I don't think the OT God conflicts with the NT God, because He was always willing to be merciful to those who repented — and never willing to be merciful to those that didn't.

Even if you think the OT was god's mistaken first go around, you have to ask why a perfect, loving enti - ty would ever put such horrid instructions for sacrifice in there.

I think the OT is for our Jewish brethern.

They think the OT prophets came up with their own ideas about God, but they were deluded.

But even if you think the OT was god's mistaken first go around, you have to ask why a perfect, loving enti - ty would ever put such horrid instructions in there.

I don't think the OT and NT are as far apart as we've been led to think.

@TGM, I don't think OT barbarism has much impact on my thoughts here; but since you mention it, I have to say that the character of Jesus seems even more astounding given the religious and cultural backdrop.

Im going to breastfed my baby because I really want to bond with my baby and i really think ots a very natural thing as well as very healthy for the baby

Not exact matches

Does that mean the throw away the ten in the OT, given by what seems to be a very hateful, spiteful and jealous god, and take up the free - thinking «god loves you» hippy who claims to be his son?

Here's a biblical quote where jesus says we should follow the OT: Jesus orders Christians to follow the Law of Moses in the Old Testament: «Do not think that I [Jesus] have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

Of course I'm probably thinking of OT verses which could be metaphorical in nature — who knows if any of it literally happened?

I don't think we should isolate gospel from the OT context and understand it without considering the implications of the OT.

Since you gave an OT example, think of Noah's ark.

I'll try to relax and think of some of the other verses that they had in the that book of Fermentations that used to come after Lamentations before they took it out of the OT.

Sorry to go OT, but there was a poster last night who I think in one post covered nearly * all * of your Top 10 (or is it 20?)

I think you should have the right ot counter it with a statement criticizing the idea of God and prayer in public meetings or schools or any gov» t led group meeting.

I think God is not the cruel Being that people think of in th OT.

I think the pattern of the OT into the NT bears out that relationship trumps mere religion.

The Islamic spin on the OT and NT is that Jewish and Christian texts have been corrupted whereas God's (Allah's) original thoughts are preserve wholesome and good in the Qur» an.

I think those passages that Jesus specifically said in relation to Satan should be given more weight then the passages in the OT.

The God of the OT will kill me for speaking out loud my thought.

I think there is much more going on in the OT violent texts than simply that humans were wrong about what God wanted.

Of course, I think that pretty much everything in the OT points to Jesus, so I am a bit biased!

So you pull an extremely out of context passage, from the OT no less, and proof text it on us and somehow think it makes your point.

Third, I think the discussion was centered around Genesis, or the OT, which is not known to be «unchanged» by any streatch of the imagination.

I thought the same thing, and upon reading the whole thing, i learned that this was a book about the OT law, and also priests, as well as the account of the festival calenders and the main heritage story of prophetic foreshadowing of the New Covenant, a better covenant.

Well, just as you think I am not reading certain OT texts at face value, I think you are ignoring much of what these NT texts are saying, and not just these passages, but the whole tenor and focus of the ministry of Jesus.

I don't think it's possible to reconcile the violent depictions of God in the OT with Jesus, his teachings, or the cross.

And I think I will take the opinion of a Hebrew Bible scholar who has dedicated years of his life to the study of Judaism and the OT over some guy who is disgruntled because he desperately dislikes the author and wants to slander him.

If you want principles to guide us about how Christians should look at immigration, then the OT is the place to look because there we have God's direct thoughts and principles on the matter.

I can't go along with the thought that Yahweh's commands in the OT (assuming we take them as genuine commands) are a model for anything today.

Please read genesis where there is no where it is mentioned that there was another partner with the Lord God... don't you think if what you are saying is correct than it will be mentioned in the OT... or OT and NT are contradicting each other... i could show more from the bible itself... i think most of the follower of it does not pay attention what to follow... they just follow blindly as Catholic church does not allow to have a copy of bible with the worshipper while they are at the church... they just have to be listening to the preacher....

Whatever we may think of the OT or the book of Revelation, we know that as followers of Jesus, we need to look like Him.

And TparTpatriot still doesn't seem to get the clear argument that I forwarded re; the historicity of the ot being derived from the Sumerian pantheon and therefore doesn't remotely mean what you all think it means.

It's not that hard to believe that the NT would fulfill prophecies in the OT to trick people like you into thinking it's divine when it's nothing more than the words of a bunch of men over a long period of time..

As I prayed and thought, I remembered Job (that I obviously didn't like for your same reasons) and thought — as it's considered the oldest book of the bible, could it be a parable of warning from God that satan would corrupt the OT for people to believe that God is not just?

But Jesus was more accepting of women, children, aliens, beggars, leppers and even sexual minorities than OT practice, which I think represents a greater inclusiveness which should lead us to believe that love / protection /» rights» be extended to these vulnerable groups and not just the priveledge adult male population.

Lewis, I agree, but I think if you want to say the OT accounts of a violent God are inaccurate, you have to be willing to say Jesus and Paul were wrong.

One more thought — just as we can't possibly understand exactly HOW the lion will lie down with the lamb, until that time when we know all things fully even as we are fully known, so we can't fully understand how the Lion of the Violent OT God is able to lie down with the Lamb of Reconcilng NT Jesus.

I think Mr. Jacobs tackles the idea of how impossible (or at least very difficult) it is to obey all the OT law, but he misses the point entirely on the NT.

There are Christian fundamentalists in congress, who believe global warming is not real because God said something in the OT which makes them think it's not real.

Also, do you believe in any truth from the OT or do you think just the NT is a better historical record?

I think the purpose of all the stories and imagery of sacrifice in the OT are meant to underscore and point to Christ's sacrifice and its significance.

I thought you don't use the OT cuz the NT was supposed to take over?

Read carefully, and think harder about this awful, vindictive, vicious god that your book of nasty clearly describes, in both OT and NT:

The early Christians thought that the entire bible OT and NT was meant to be followed to the letter.

I think there iis a little more at the Core ot Italy and Italian existance than the Crucifix.

Sam, I am one of those who think Paul did write it, but I do agree with you that he was probably referring only to the OT.