Not exact matches
As a cancer researcher, do you
think the mechanisms of tumor growth are somehow changing to come into line with your perceptions, or is it possible that the process of our learning more
about DNA mutations and cell architecture and nutrient exchange and
epigenetic effects make it possible for us to inch ever closer to understanding that which is already going on under our noses?
«We need to readjust and
think more broadly
about the
epigenetic process as a whole.»
Nicholas Staropoli, who runs the nonprofit
Epigenetics Literacy Project,
thinks that even though Episona's science is good, the data to support actionable conclusions
about male fertility may not be there yet.
Epigenetics has also led to «a paradigm shift
thinking about cancer,» Tilghman said.
And we
think that the regulation of those cells that results in behaving as if we are in a chronic stress kind of environment is explained by this field that's burgeoning right now that's referred to as
epigenetics that talks
about the programming of our cells.
I would wager they play
about 20 - 30 % in impact (seen in diabetes AGEs and glucosepane formation; again this where this is very touching on the DNA damage role and seperating from the
epigenetic role of aging; they can be uncoupled making these DNA damage elements muddled and less important than previously
thought (I'm only talking
about healthy aging, not pathological aging (as in the diabetes, Diabetes will greatly improve by GlycoSENS.