Regardless of what
you think about the abortion question, you have to admit that this is not the time to revisit that question.
What do
you think about the abortion issue?
That shapes the way that
we think about abortion.
I remember asking the former dean of Boston College, a Jesuit priest, «Father, what do
you think about this abortion issue?»
Hartshorne appears to compartmentalize
his thinking about abortion.
This is seen in the tendency today to
think about abortion and homosexuality in terms of moral absolutes assumed to be biblical.
Intrusion is about reliving the traumatic experience in different ways, for example by having recurring
thoughts about the abortion or aborted child, or having flashbacks, nightmares or intensely depressive reactions around the time of significant anniversaries.
When
thinking about abortion and this year's presidential election, a few questions come to mind.
Now, I had not been
thinking about abortion at all.
When I got pregnant again, made it to 33 weeks, and then delivered a stillborn boy,
I thought about abortion again.
It also made me really
think about the abortions that happen in our country.
If you're pregnant and
thinking about abortion, you may have lots of questions.
If you're pregnant and
thinking about abortion, you may have questions about your options.
Not exact matches
Hmmmmm.You
think God is all
about the
abortion?
I don't care what you
think about guns or
abortion, or anything else.
Despite Jody's observations, I
think McCain was absolutely right not to spend a lot time talking
about abortion and related issues in his acceptance speech.
If we really
think about this statement we will understand just how absurd and immoral
abortion is.
i
think if people have a non
abortion option to not getting pregnent, then they shouldnt worry
about so - called celibate men is dresses telling them its wrong....
i
think its funny how catholics standup beat chest
about how great and holy they are by helping the poor, stopping
abortion while OPENLY denying thousand of peoples cry
about pedaphile priests....
I
think that the people that wrote that letter to the speaker of the house should
think about all the poor babies that have been killed because of the government paying for
abortions.
What do you
think this blog is
about,
abortion or something??? Let's get back to the pressing topic at hand, namely, how stupid, willfully ignorant, and hateful everyone who believes differently than you is!
When I first read
about the bill proposed in Texas that would require fetal remains to be buried or cremated after miscarriages or
abortions, my first
thoughts were, «How does this help people?
What do you
think a Christian should
think about when deciding whether
abortion is wrong or right?
I can't help but
think that some people are in denial
about what really occurs during
abortion because they are more concerned with loosing something personally than taking responsibility for hurting someone else like a baby.
This is not
about logic, it's teens doing what they want without
thinking about the potential consequences because they know they can get an
abortion and take care of it.
Health and sex education and home economics texts and curricula avoid any discussion of religious ways of
thinking about sexuality, marriage,
abortion and homosexuality.
I guess I feel the same way
about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I
think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term
abortions) or a government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil than any other nation on the planet.
If the US,, for example would finally decide that
abortion was murder then,, I
think more people would feel bad
about it, keep from doing it, and then know to ask God for forgiveness.
For instance, we can ask: How did the social / philosophical / religious environment in which a person was raised affect the way in which that individual
thinks about tyranny in general, and the problem of
abortion in particular?
The Hawaiian court has thus set itself on the same course of action as the misguided Supreme Court in 1973 when it
thought that laws
about abortion were merely an assertion of the rights of a living mother and an unborn fetus.
Too often the way in which people
think about the problem of
abortion is like a broken record or a repeating tape loop.
They may
think that we should not talk
about abortion in a homily because there will be women in the congregation who have had an
abortion.
The revision of American
thought and practice
about life questions began with
abortion, and examination of the moral confusion attending that issue helps us understand more general developments in public morality.
Catholic schools, for example, used to
think of academic freedom as in the service of the truth we find in natural law, the truth
about abortion, the relational person, and so forth.
Stanley Hauerwas, an American theologian who has
thought deeply
about disability, wrote an essay on
abortion that joins up biblical convictions to arrive at this conclusion: «The church is a family into which children are brought and received.
How would the President encourage pro-life pastors to
think about the President's views on
abortion?
«I fear that many women are simply not provided with enough information
about their options, and so they choose
abortion because they
think it's the only way out of a difficult situation.»
I
think there is, in as much as
about 70 percent of Americans disapprove of convenience
abortions even in the first trimester of pregnancy, and in as much as people like me, when they come to consider the question seriously, have sometimes changed their minds.
I don't
think they are overly worred
about abortion — they just don't want to provide BC so that women can have «se - x without consequences!»
Here's the bottom line: the final decision when it comes to
abortion should be left to one person, and one person only: the woman
thinking about having one.
Those who regard the Servant example as perhaps a little strained and antiquarian may prefer to
think about other cases mentioned in the book: the shipping clerk who dispatches land mines, or the nurse who hands instruments to a doctor who plans to use them for an
abortion.
Seen from this perspective, the interviewees admit that they agree that
abortion is never morally justifiable: a «180» in their
thinking about the legalised killing of over 53 million persons in the United States since Roe v. Wade.
3 Incidentally, questions
about abortion should not, I
think, enter in at all here, since the question as to whether
abortion is right or wrong depends on whether one believes that killing is ever justified.
Chad,
think about this: The GOP is against
abortion and that makes many evangelical Christians feel they MUST vote for them because, if they do not, they are supporting murder.
This is why I don't
think most Christians who demand laws against
abortion are sincere
about it being
about «respect for human life».
In reading Ms. Davidson's criticism, one is impressed again by the uncompromisable centrality of
abortion in so much current
thinking about the liberated life for both the privileged and the poor.
Those who are involved in small groups often claim that these groups have influenced how they
think on political and economic issues — for example, raising their interest in questions of peace and social justice or, in the case of conservative religious groups, generating ire
about abortion and gay rights.
Think about all of the people that are not here due to the potential future generations of Holocaust victims,
abortion victims, etc... What
about the people that lost their potential soulmate in the Holocaust?
Now it is
about the proper roles of men and women, same - sex unions and divorce and having children and a host of other questions once
thought not to be political, and all of them somehow entangled with and ever returning to the conflict created by the Roe v. Wade discovery in the Constitution of an unlimited
abortion license.
In voting for someone who I
think will help reduce the number of
abortions, I vote for someone who does not share my conviction
about the sanctity of human life.