Sentences with phrase «think about the creation»

«If you think about the creation of asset bubbles, that's always what happens,» Ariely says.

In planning creation this way, in God's one Thought about creation, Mary stands as the peak of evolution, the highpoint of the Universe, the first of all creatures under Christ.

Furthermore, this way of thinking reveals dangerous dualistic thinking about creation.

What do you think about the creation and preservation of the universe and life?

You don't have to go very far down that road before you start thinking about creation science or scientific creationism, or get involved in school board squabbles about whether Genesis should be taught alongside of evolution in high school biology courses.

As biology, for example, moves forward on its frontier at the molecular level, religion has a new way opened up for it also, just as evolutionary biology opened up a whole new province for religious thinking about creation.

I didn't have to think about the creation, the formatting, or all the technical stuff.

It worked because it hints to a lot of stuff (the NPCs appear over the world from time to time, giving you the feeling of agency even if few actions are really rendered in the game, and the lore makes you think about the creation myth of that game and other kingdoms you don't get to visit).

Not exact matches

Many of the environmentalists who responded angrily to Steiner beseech readers to, as the Minneapolis non-profit wrote, «think about «profits» a little more broadly» to include the job creation and environmental benefits that recycling brings.

While there is no right or wrong when it comes to content creation and sharing, I'd say that a loose guideline may be helpful as a way to think about the various uses of social networks.

You also have to start thinking about link building and content creation guys.

Thomas thinks that it is the discipline of metaphysics that asks questions about the ultimate cause of existence of things, and, as he says, «not only does faith hold that there is creation, reason also demonstrates it» (In II Sent., dist.

It is observed that every heresy is a truth that has lost its balance, and at present, as well as in the past, flirtation with heresy and heresy itself have attended much thinking about the relationship between God and his creation.

IF you were to look at creation it - self and how complex and in order things are surely after a few days of thinking about it you would have to say there must have be a creator in all of this stuff going on??? there is to much out there to say it all happened by chance or accicedent... you do nt have to go past the moon or the nearest planet to see what im talking aobut i will pray that God will reveal him self to you and you too can see what im talking aobut... you can emial me if you like randytherealtor7 at yahoo com

On the other hand, the younger set takes their sexual cues from the resurrection (preferring not to think about the so - called «order of creation») while using Genesis to highlight their culture - making activities and their environmental concerns.

Regarding Ryan's ruminations on S.M. Hutchens» review of E.O. Wilson's The Creation: An Appeal to Save Life on Earth (warning: I've read neither the book nor the review, just Ryan's post about them), I think Ryan has it right in concluding that in Wilson's account of Christianity «nature has become only a vehicle for supernature.»

Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;

I even have a problem with «Literature as Literature»: Reading King Lear, I don't think about Shakespeare; reading Paradise Lost, my eye is not on Milton, but the creation.

In the case of the creation story you must read it as if you were a hunter / gatherer (caveman) who did not have a concept of time (no watches, no calendars, most likely someone who didn't keep track of how old he was — think about indigenous peoples who had no contact with western civilization until the 20th century).

But somehow the humourless church soon thought that Jesus was teaching about not getting genitals cut of but commending the voluntary choice to reject the creation commands by staying unmarried with genitals intact.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

In my day job as the editor of The Englewood Review of Books, I've staked my life and work on the hope that reading carefully and well will undoubtedly transform us, reforming the ways that we think, talk about and live within this wondrous web of life that is God's creation.

It might seem to be minor for us adults, but it's devastating for any little girl thinking about her own place in the creation and how God is valuing her.

Nygren gives an important suggestion about the history of doctrine when he says that the Church Fathers were saved from falling completely into a Greek pattern of thought by the three biblical assertions of Creation, Incarnation, and Resurrection.32 But rather than conclude, as Nygren does, that these themes require us to reject all metaphysics, why not say that they require us to reconsider our metaphysics?

Is it really likely that when the Romans heard Paul's words about creation being «subjected to futility» in 8:20 they «could well have thought about how imperial ambitions, military conflicts, and economic exploitation had led to the erosion of the natural environment throughout the Mediterranean world, leaving ruined cities, depleted fields, deforested mountains, and polluted streams as evidence of this universal human vanity»?

But nothing is lost and much is gained when our grasp of the truth about God's living action in these areas precludes the thought that God intervenes to violate the internal congruity and consistency of the divine creation with its never - absent divine energizing in and through created entities, events, and happenings.

It is an astounding detail when you think about it: The God of all creation, the One who knows every corner of the cosmos and fathoms every mystery, the One who could answer every theological riddle and who, I suspect, chuckles at our volumes of guesses, our centuries of pompous philosophical tomes debating His nature, when present in the person of Jesus Christ, told stories.

Although we do not know much about their character, God seemed to think that they represented everything that was good and worth saving about creation.

Jeremy Myers i also think Genesis isn't as much about the Creation of the world, as it is Israel's creatiCreation of the world, as it is Israel's creationcreation story

I believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is in favour of creation over evolution — «random chance» aka evolution is mathematically to astounding to believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code — random chance can not create a code sequence nor can random chance ever improve itself... just think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for life.

In Gall's case, this juxtaposition not only reduces philosophy and theology to mere «bluster,» thereby liberating us to act without thinking seriously; it suggests that none of the consequences that follow from, for example, the codification of same - sex marriage — the redefinition of kinship, the irrevocable technologizing of human «reproduction,» further expansion of the «new eugenics,» deliberate creation of three - parent households, and least of all, the fate of children conceived in this brave new world — even provoke questions of human import worth thinking seriously about.

Engaging in this kind of thought experiment is great, because it forces us to think about the physicality of the coming kingdom and helps us picture a world full of human creations rather than one of fluffy clouds and winged babies babies flying around.

Is there anybody who thinks you can tell something about the couch / car / watch designers personal feelings and desires from looking at the creation??

Then he began to think thoughts about «God and man» or about being «all in all,» which he hoped would enable him to understand the mystery of all creation.

Jenkins shows that the Summa is not a system that provides categories of thought, but an attempt to ground all our thoughts about God and his creation in our participation in God's mind.

The camp is located on a lake, and about 50 years ago, when they built the kitchen and dining hall, they thought it would be nice to situate the building on the lakeshore so that people could look at God's glorious creation while cooking or eating.

If he does allow that Christian reason can perceive evidence of the creator in his creation, he must acknowledge that this does provide a second basis for thinking about God alongside his revelation in Christ.

I want to know if they think physicist Paul Davie is right about the obvious creation of universe governing physical laws, if Einstein was right in a God presence and what they think about quantum mechanics that goes back to von Neumann, where one is led by its logic (as Wigner and Peierls were) to the conclusion that not everything is just matter in motion.

I will offer a somewhat systematic review of New Thought philosophy, considering textual sources and hermeneutics, beliefs about the nature of Divinity, humankind, christology, and universal creation, and how these beliefs inform the way New Thought addresses suffering.

Luther's followers think that everything is about happiness and wealth creation when they open up these houses they call churches.

It's a pretty basic step to apply that thought process to a story about the creation of the earth

@ anvil once again — you talk about ignorance, but you are the definition of it completely — man check out this book — Ultimate proof of Creation — Jason Lisle, read the book then think about your statements — unless your afraid

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

If he ever has the opportunity to share his notions about the universe around us with the creator, I think the creator will find his hypothases about creation just as amusing as the rest of our opinions.

This post contains five images of creation which I thought were spectacular, and one exciting announcement about a future feature of this blog.

He wanted the church to recognize the positive aspects of this: people no longer needed the old props and were open to new ways of thinking about God, humanity and creation.

Annabelle: Creation is a movie that pushed me to think long and hard about the role of demonic activity and the occult in modern - day America, and was an excellent piece of cinema.

So just as the «not good» in Genesis 2 matches the silence about the goodness of creation on day two in Genesis 1, I think we should be looking for the moment in Genesis 2 that matches that culminating «very good» in Genesis 1.

«In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth» is the first verse of the Bible which says all creation that you and everyone know, test and think about was created by God.

Let's think about what we've read so many times in the Genesis account of Creation.