Sentences with phrase «think about the disagreement»

How might she think about the disagreement?

Think about this disagreement with your partner from the perspective of a neutral third party who wants the best for all involved; a person who sees things from a neutral point of view.

How might this person think about the disagreement?

Not exact matches

He always played the victim, made me feel bad even about the smallest disagreements, hinted at killing himself if I ever left him, etc.... I don't think that what I did was / is the right thing to do at all, but sometimes things like these make you realize that «Oh.

Given the huge number of moral disagreements in the world, we should think twice about becoming the sort of people who let such disagreements get in the way of engaging in mutually beneficial trade.

«I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact,» he told CNBC.

Here's an article I just read that I think ties in well with Jennifer's point about the level of disagreement on this blog.

We are still in disagreement about some important things: that used to bother us but now we think it keeps things interesting.

Frist of all, I think we have to begin by acknowledging that part of the reason this is a difficult topic, and part of the reason we have disagreement on it, is because Jesus never really talks about it directly.

Finding a way to sit at the table with them in the midst of that pain and disagreement leads us to think about the third function of pastoral care

«The constant experience of doctrinal disagreements contributed to a Western tendency to make the Christian experience more about ideas than about heart - driven living faith, more what you think than what you do; more assensus than fiducia, more ideas about God than surrender to him.

Pippa Evans and Sanderson Jones — two British comedians — have opened the Sunday Assembly, which is calling itself the first atheist church in the U.K. «We thought it would be a shame not to enjoy the good stuff about religion, like the sense of community, just because of a theological disagreement,» says Mr. Jones, who once sold out a show the Sydney Opera House by selling all his tickets by hand, which is pretty impressive.

But I think those points are often why disagreement happens, not because there is some truth about the actual terms.

Two errors must be avoided in thinking about the problem of moral disagreement and pluralism.

I didn't think about arguments and disagreements or how my anger can rear its ugly head when I'm in close relationship with others.

I thank him for his engagement on this issue, even if he is actually wrong about a lot of things.I think the heart of our disagreement is the Bible and how to read it.I think that's unquestionably....

But alas, you don't seem to think there can be any genuine theological disagreements about what is sinful, so we are at an impasse.

Acting on the suggestion, Arjun set about collecting the authentic hymns of Nanak, as well as those of his successors, including his own, and to these added many hymns from the Indian Saints which were not in disagreement with the thought of Nanak.

At the root of the disagreement about perfection, I think, is the fact that we sometimes forget that according to Christianity the purpose of moral imperatives is not to make people righteous, but to show them their sin (as Paul taught in Galatians).

Jefferson in his many words is todays paul by basically testifying to a lost society by preaching «The heart «that is what God wants not the shell which will rott away.I can stand with this truth until the day I die because I also have had disagreements in my church about this same topic.I dispise religion and encourage salvation which come from having a relationship with Jesus.Many may ask how do i have a relationship with him?by simply asking God through prayer, not what we know as pray but simply given up and telling God he win.That is what being righteous means saying «lord your're right and i will believe and obey that.Last i will like to thank jefferson for this clip, becuase for so long I have been feeling like todays churches in not like the first churches.They are stuck into their four cornered walls preaching to those who already obtain the word and people who already think they are perfect, but what about the weak and the sinners who we are suppose to love, go after, preach to, help and deliver the same way as Christ camed for the sinners so do we also be like him.Jefferson basically telling all us young people and old no matter who have suffered in the world, the church, or no matter what party or the past that there is hope and «God wants that person» not the sin but the person.Jefferson wants us to know that God can become personal with us and we do exist or can exist in the christian world not because we are perfect but because «he is perfect and he saw our broken spirits and rescued us!

In her post-eviction interview with host Emma Willis, Widdecombe was asked about the disagreements she had with Janek and if the confrontations gave her «food for thought».

Whatever I think about our many football disagreements, I easily recognise you as a thoroughly decent man.

«People tend to think that there is general disagreement about the way forward on separated families.

If there is disagreement it may also lead to some protracted negotiations with your school district, looking at special education settings that your district offers, and finding out more about the schools that you think are the best fit.

I don't think your disagreement about how to characterise Rawls or Obama is because he hasn't done the reading!

- No I really do not think that it is... the GOP is definately a big government party its just a matter of disagreement about how it should do these things not if they should do it.

So both right - wing and independent voices also think this is a potentially significant political issue, as This Independent piece shows, However, the main post showing the scale of climate scepticism was primarily about the disagreement between Conservatives, noting the frontbench's support.

He was also open about disagreements with his party leader, saying:» If I said to you that Ed and I agree on every issue then I think you'd be a bit doubtful about it because I wouldn't be doing my job and sometimes we have to disagree.

«When he made his about - turn on a UK referendum he thought that he could close down disagreement within his party and force other member states to give in to Britain's point of view.

... If it's about political disagreement, I think you have to pause here, especially if it's about the Syria vote.»

The reappraisal writing task asked participants to think about their most recent disagreement with their partner from the perspective of a neutral third party.

Even more than whatever networking and / or friendly conversations happen between people in party situations, it's the experience of being able to share our thoughts and feelings about a movie right afterward — talk about, work through it, maybe even get into (hopefully) friendly disagreements over it — that, for me, are the most memorable experiences a film festival can offer.

They don't want to move forward, and it's not my place to say why, and Neil, I think, is in a slight disagreement with them about how things should go so there's a standstill.

To measure tolerance we included four statements on the survey to which students could express their level of agreement or disagreement: 1) People who disagree with my point of view bother me; 2) Artists whose work is critical of America should not be allowed to have their work shown in art museums; 3) I appreciate hearing views different from my own; and 4) I think people can have different opinions about the same thing.

There is significant disagreement among education scholars about how to improve education, so why should we think that judges can resolve this vexatious dispute for us?

Tolerance was also measured with statements to which students could express agreement or disagreement, ranging from «People who disagree with my point of view bother me,» to «I think people can have different opinions about the same thing.»

Mr. Hess points to longstanding disagreements between the left's focus on implicit bias and the right's perspective that «the more we fixate on skin color, the more we prime people to think about it.»

In fact, I think it's safe to say that no one who writes or comments on this blog agrees entirely with each other, but we can still come together to talk about our areas of agreement and disagreement.

Aside from a disagreement with the conclusion or presumptions, what does the reviewer think about the quality of writing?

Anyway, back to the topic in hand - in short, I think with so many books out there you're not being narrow minded in choosing not to read the Left Behind series and, frankly, considering you'd probably only get into a disagreement with your friend about them if you did, it's probably prudent of you not to!

And I think the reason rests upon a friendly disagreement about another tacit marker of professional success.

If this is so, then we are not really in that wide a disagreement about how much we think we know, just about whether what we do know is sufficient to be meaningful, useful, etc..

People will disagree about the right course of treatment, but thinking about the choices in this way might give the disagreements the appropriate focus.

I accept that and I think everybody does, although there might be disagreements about accuracy.

And I think there is an important, but small, correction to make here — it should be the «violence of the disagreement about climate science» as the vast majority of the violent disagreement comes from the outside.

He told CNBC, «I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact.»

For instance, considerably more Tea Party members than Republicans incorrectly thought there was a lot of scientific disagreement about global warming (69 percent to 56 percent).

The articles were quite entertaining but the two had a disagreement when Steve made a claim about co2 being able to condense out of the sky at the arctic (I think)

Pruitt answered: «No, I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do, and there's tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact.

There can be disagreements about whether HadSST3 is an improvement on HadSST2, but attributing a dishonorable motive to them would I think discredit the person who suggests it, and would be more typical of fierce blogosphere partisanship than rational discourse..