Sentences with phrase «think about the existence»

Also think about your existence, go back step by step and you will find you were not exist in the face of earth... then there must be someone who is running the entire universe...

To the inquiry, «What do you think about the existence of God?»

That's my reaction every time I think about the existence of this movie.

We use those resources in a regular basis and do not even think about their existence — if we are not in a shortage of those two.

The Sims 3 Store can technically be accessed in game, however, it can also be completely hidden so that players who want nothing to do with it don't even have to think about its existence.

Not exact matches

Think about how far humanity has progressed in its short 200,000 years of existence.

Thomas thinks that it is the discipline of metaphysics that asks questions about the ultimate cause of existence of things, and, as he says, «not only does faith hold that there is creation, reason also demonstrates it» (In II Sent., dist.

Steven, you're right, a god's existence would be empirically untestable, unless it manifested itself in our universe in some way and demonstrated that it can bend the natural laws etc.... But, what gets me, is that you're saying that it is a waste of time to think about things that are empirically untestable.

(the way someone thinks about the world) Do you no view people of the world with Inherent existence; existence possessed by virtue of a being's own nature, and independent of any other being or cause?

I am not able to think like God, but I wonder how He feels about all this fighting back and forth about His existence.

When you think about the reason why you most likely dismiss the existence of Zeus or Vishnu, you will understand why I dismiss the existence of Jehovah.

We would be left claiming the existence of that about which nothing whatsoever could be said or thought.

In this situation, since God's existence as cause of things is known, the objection that nothing further can be said or thought about God univocally might appear as a quibble.

A «gnostic» is one who knows about the existence of god and an «agnostic» is one who thinks that god is unknowable.

Think about it: What meaning would God have had to his existence prior to creating?

God has given us much evidence of His existence: how about the intricacies of how the human body works - can you really believe that happened without a master plan; what about the beauty of nature - can we really think that that just happened; what about the testimony of millions throughout the ages including Scientists attempting to disprove God, that point to things beyond their comprehension or doing.

One insight provided by Hartshorne's work on the ontological argument is that the concept of the existence of God is something akin to a regulative idea for the rational thought about reality which is attempted in Hartshorne's metaphysics.

If your infinite chain theories were logical and truly proved the existence of a god, don't you think that this would be major news and others would be talking about your theory?

You know, the one that aches every time you think about how lonely your godless existence is?

Whitehead so emphatically repudiates the Platonic tendency to think of the realm of forms as constituting a superior, self - sufficient type of existence, that he interprets even the propositions of mathematics as statements about certain possible forms of process.

And when he was thinking about human existence itself, he was intent upon saying that a whole human person was compounded of body as well as of soul; in the end, he said, the two would be reunited after the separation which death had brought about.

They take us to the edge of our existence and force us to think about the meaning of it all.

In these quite different ways, something is being said about a refreshment or enablement which is provided for human existence; and something is also being said, even in a fashion which sometimes seems curiously negative (as in Indian religious thought and observance), about a relationship with a more ultimate and all - inclusive reality that establishes a kind of companionship between our own little life and the greater circumambient divine being.

Regardless of a god's existence, I would say there is a difference between the heart of a murderer, i.e. thinking about murder, and hate.

It insists that thinking that occurs apart from critical involvement ends up in constructions of theories about existence that keep us from the real world.

Most of the time, however, we simply take our creaturely worth as something granted and given; we may not think about it much if at all, yet it is the basis for our existence.

It is my thesis that, in conjunction with his profound reflections on the good and the thought about the nature of man bound up with it, Socrates entered into a new structure of existence.

As soon as one begins to think about the basic issues of human existence, one is faced with the question of where to turn to find a trustworthy guide.

The obligation to bear and communicate such meanings against his natural feeling and thinking was the ground of Jeremiah's discovery of his selfhood as «I.» Not the reception of the Word as such but the necessity to decide about it was crucial to the formation of this structure of existence and to its preservation and strengthening in the Jewish community.

If you don't want to think about God's existence, then choose not to read the damn billboard.

Science and metaphysics too, providing the latter is viewed as a natural mode of cognition and is not unconsciously supplemented by theological knowledge about God's saving action in the history of redemption, can each from their own angle quite well think of God as the transcendent ground of all reality, of its existence and of its becoming, as the primordial reality comprising everything, supporting everything, but precisely for that reason can not regard him as a partial factor and component in the reality with which we are confronted, nor as a member of its causal series.

An agnostic atheist would take the stance that although they currently don't believe in God and don't think there is any evidence about such an existence, they don't completely rule out the possibility of God because they don't think the question is fully knowable.

I think the worst part of accepting the truth about Santa is the subsequent concern that the existence of God is also a myth.

The Valparaiso Project on the Education and Formation of People in Faith, based at Valparaiso University in Indiana, has been encouraging people to think about and live the communal practices that form Christian existence.

Richard Dawkins as a stupid man and greatly admire his presentation of the evidence for natural selection; but I think he is wrong about the existence of God and I would argue that the evidence shows him to be wrong.»

If you think about any one of these rules, and they came into existence, you will likely recall the events and situations that led up to making such a law necessary for the happy existence of your family.

... If our politicians were realists, they would think rather less about missiles and the problem of landing astronauts on the moon, rather more about hunger and moral squalor and the problem of enabling three billion men, women, and children, who will soon be six billions, to lead a tolerably human existence without, in the process, ruining and befouling their planetary environment.

What has so far been said about it does not mean that we first actively think the word «God» individually and that it thus invades our existence.

Apparently he thought of it as coming in with «Adam's fall,» the transgression of an ancient ancestor fastening sin upon his descendants; but he also thought of it as related to the activities of demons, about the existence of which neither Paul nor his contemporaries had any doubt.

I don't know about you, but I would believe the people who study the human mind, thoughts, and behavior (i.e. psychologists and sociologists), over someone who says there's some spooky external agent that no one can possibly verify the existence of, and which has no consistent pattern of action with which to use as evidence for verification.

Why do you think atheists worry about existence or non-existence of Jesus?

But for our present purpose, it is enough to say that when we are thinking about the last things, our thought must include much more than human existence and human personality in its body - mind totality, even in its social relationships.

Scientists do not have clear, provable theories to describe the evolution of all species in existence, and everything about the earth (if you think I'm wrong on this point, you either live in a box or you're delusional), but we do not throw out evolutionary theory merely because it is incomplete.

I can't prove God's existence just as much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen, evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.

I am suggesting that we must think differently about what the saving love of God means if it is to speak to our time, addressing the question of the possible end of existence raised by, ecological deterioration and nuclear escalation and that we do this by thinking in different images.

Creation comes about only through destruction, in a universe and plane of existence of seemingly infinite stretches and constantly redefined understandings, the poor wretch who clings to archaic mans reasoning will find himself continually outclassed, out thought and out performed.

You'd think between the existence of over 700,000 words in the Bible and the testimony of nature we could know at least something about faith.

If my statements about atheists sound negative it is not personal I simply think a frog and man have a different reason for existence.

Our concern has been simply to indicate what process - thought in a general way has to tell us about God, the world, the nature of man and society, coupled with some discussion of its references to the historical figure of Jesus and its way of envisaging the destiny of man both in and beyond his present mortal existence.

Whatever we perceive to be the truth about God, I think there is some things we all can agree on, believers and anyone who doesn't believe in the existence of God and that is that it is self evident that all are born equal and with dignity and it's best if everyone relate to each other as part of the human family.