Sentences with phrase «think about the genome»

he continues to pose questions and do experiments that affect our ability to understand the human genome... and he continues to change the way we think about the genome, how to navigate it, and what those changes mean in transcriptional regulation,» said Elaine A. Ostrander, NIH Distinguished Investigator and Chief of the Cancer Genetics & Comparative Genomics Branch at the National Human Genome Research Institute and one of those nominating Kruglyak for this honor.

Not exact matches

[1:20] How the kindness of a stranger changed Tony's life [3:35] Peter Diamandis talks about the origins of X Prize [6:30] Technology helping the agricultural industry [7:00] Sequencing genomes [8:55] Life - work integration [11:15] Finding your highest calling in life [12:00] Reframing what is «impossible» [14:00] Strategy vs. psychology [15:00] Changing your state [16:00] The science of achievement, the art of fulfillment [19:00] Living in a beautiful state [24:00] Thinking 10x bigger [28:00] Surrounding yourself with a «nothing is impossible» community [29:00] The news pollutes your mind [31:00] Tony's natural gifts and core beliefs [33:30] Overcoming failure and criticism [37:45] Defining your environment [40:00] Life happens for you, not to you [42:00] Rituals and practices to up your game [46:30] Tony's priming process
I just think it's really odd... when I was in school we were talking about all the wonders that will come from mapping the human genome... but I don't recall the term microbiome being mentioned a single time..
«I think what's interesting about combining whole genome analysis and histopathology is that we can study the tumor at multiple levels,» said co-author Rakopoulos.
Fussenegger thinks that genome editing will be the favoured approach for therapies, but that writing genomes from scratch will appeal to scientists interested in fundamental questions about how genomes evolve, for instance.
But Knome founder George Church's genome has about three times as much Neandertal, which we thought was funny.
«It took full genome sequences and a lot of good sense about how to cull the data, and I think that their conclusions are really robust.»
Think of a 166 million - piece jigsaw puzzle, given that the size of the B. braunii genome is estimated to be about 166 million bases, he said.
She concedes that there are risks of making predictions like these, but adds: «I believe that people should have access to information about themselves, and I think it's laudable that 23andMe has helped pave the way for people to better understand their genomes
This catalog «will change the way people think about and actually use the human genome, says John A. Stamatoyannopoulos, an ENCODE researcher at the University of Washington, Seattle.
All together, the researchers found about 37,000 mutations occurring in 10,000 clusters in the chimp and human genomes that they think were caused by these proteins, they report today in Genome Research.
«I don't think there is necessarily one area of the genome that's going to tell you everything about performance,» Doodnauth says.
So we have this huge genome, our DNA, if you thought of it as letters, you have about three and one half billion letters long.
«There does seem to be an upper bound of what we can learn about common diseases with multiple causes,» says Kraft, who thinks the paper illustrates why «we're not going to have a huge impact» on the average person with genome sequencing.
Much of we thought we knew about the genome is proving too simplistic, show The Deeper Genome and The Developing Ggenome is proving too simplistic, show The Deeper Genome and The Developing GGenome and The Developing GenomeGenome.
We provide initial insights into two critical issues: what clinical value can be extracted from different commercial and academic cancer genomic platforms, and how to think about scaling access to that value,» noted the study's Principal Investigator, Robert Darnell, MD, PhD, Robert and Harriet Heilbrunn Professor and Senior Attending Physician at The Rockefeller University and Founding Director of the New York Genome Center.
Think about it: on a HiSeq X Ten instrument, we can sequence a complete human genome in less than a week, at a cost that's 0.00001 % of what it took to fund the Human Genome Prgenome in less than a week, at a cost that's 0.00001 % of what it took to fund the Human Genome PrGenome Project.
I was working in a community of people who were all thinking about looking at genetic variations, of how you might look at them and how you might understand them, and so reading lots of papers from other folks who were doing great work in that area I just looked at ways that you could basically go across the human genome and look at every variation, everything that's variable between human populations.
Though the HGP achieved its proposed goals, some think discussion about the genome's potentials in the future was too ambitious.
The number of lethal loci in the Drosophila genome is thought to be about 5000 (Nusslein - Volhard, 1994; Lewin, 1994), but new data allow us to refine this figure downwards.
Along with changing how we think about genes, the Human Genome Project spawned lots of other projects.
The next time you carve a pumpkin, take a moment to think about the curious evolutionary path it took to get here, and how breeders, now armed with the genome sequence, will be better able to improve the pumpkin to help feed millions around the world.
Having your genome sequenced is a personal choice that may change the way you think about yourself and your family.
As cancer genome sequencing ramps up here and pretty much everywhere around the world, I got to thinking about strategies for identifying somatic changes, with confidence, from massively parallel sequencing data.
Putting aside any questions about how useful this information is right now and how it is marketed, do you think companies should be able to offer a service where consumers send in a spit or blood sample and a few hundred dollars and get their genome sequenced in return?
I think that few people appreciate the scale of the 1,000 Genomes Project and just how much information it's already yielding about human genetic variation.
Unlike Kurzweil, I don't view the brain or genomes as computer codes but I will read more about his work and ideas as he makes me think about some of my unconscious (pun intended) assumptions.
«But with the completion of the human genome sequence and the availability of the kinome, one can begin to think about how to do this in a much wider and unbiased sense.»
The information gained from genome sequencing can not be «unlearned»: it may change the way you think about your health and the health of your family, who you are, and how you see yourself in the world.
Kucherlapati: Without thinking about modifying the human genome line, would this technology have the ability to affect the health of humans by modifying the stem cells?
It might be useful to think about the Human Genome Project, where similar issues came up about a decade ago, and there was clear discussion about this, and in the public genome sequencing laboratories, a real commitment, dedication to getting that data out into the public as soon as posGenome Project, where similar issues came up about a decade ago, and there was clear discussion about this, and in the public genome sequencing laboratories, a real commitment, dedication to getting that data out into the public as soon as posgenome sequencing laboratories, a real commitment, dedication to getting that data out into the public as soon as possible.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z