I think acceptable risk, however, is such a personal decision.
Not exact matches
«I
think a garden variety recession is an
acceptable risk, but I am also concerned that such a downturn might morph into something more serious.»
Many folk would deem it an
acceptable level of
risk to take, though they might, at least,
think twice if death was a consequence.
The most startling finding of the report, released by the nonpartisan
think - tank, MassINC (The Massachusetts Institute for a New Commonwealth), is that 667,000 of the 1.1 million at -
risk workers have earned a high school credential but still lack basic math, reading, writing, language, and analytic skills at the level considered
acceptable for the typical 21st century workplace.
Remember that many companies have pulled out of the North Carolina property insurance market in recent years, largely because of a disconnect between what the state
thinks are
acceptable rates and what
acceptable rates that represent the
risk actually entail.
I
think that 1,25 - 1,30 is still
acceptable but it definitely add some
risk.
If you
think it's a good deal and will provide you, and your family, a head start for the future and feel like their plan works with an
acceptable amount of
risk then by all means go for it.
I'm not a big believer in cash, as I
think «there is always a bull market somewhere» (haha, sorry to quote Cramer)-- generally, I
think ratcheting up and down my
risk arb / event driven investment allocation is a perfectly
acceptable alternative to cash, and much more rewarding.
I
think the biggest take aways... # 1 - You have to either figure out what is
acceptable for you and your market OR find a new market and # 2 - If you really want all variables accounted for in some formula, you have to find a quotient for time and
risk.