Sentences with phrase «think are harmful»

«We are opposed to Sats, we think they are harmful to our children and our members, but this review gives us the best opportunity to change that regime.

There is no air circulation to the skin, plus the chemical they use I think are harmful to their delicate skins.

In his mind, he is always right, and therefore, the tolerable one, whose aim is (David's # 2), to «challenge ideas that he thinks are harmful to people,»

I think it's harmful to imagine such beliefs make you moral.

Do you think it's harmful, harmless or helpful?

Because personally, I think it's harmful and misleading.

I worried too much with my first and I think that was harmful to both of us.

I definitely don't think the MSM is necessary, but I also don't think it is harmful.

this shampoo contains essential oils including bergamot and also ylang ylang... but I think it was harmful for my scalp because it has dried all the oils of the scalp.

Burns: Well, I certainly think it's harmful to rely on technologies that seek to mask the warming that's associated with emissions.

PF: While human ingenuity seems almost endless, do you think it's harmful to rely solely on technology to confront the challenges that global warming poses?

But it seems that while many of the Ethiopian men I spoke with were aware that their partners have been mutilated and thought this was a harmful practice, they still did not seem to understand how or why this might cause women to be passive and unenthusiastic in bed.

Not exact matches

And, if you go into a call thinking that everyone will want it, that can be just as harmful.

Further, leaders of businesses that produce products that are harmful or dangerous (i.e. weapons, tobacco, etc.) aren't likely to be thinking about more than meeting the expectations of their shareholders.

In short, science suggests that how we think about stress determines how harmful it is to our health:

Robert See, I find that anyone who denies what scientific evidence objectively reveals in favour of what they personally think must be correct without any evidence whatsoever must be operating out of the same harmful pride you're talking about.

The result is that some people think they can ignore science and make up their own reality — very harmful to science and society.

I think the «sin» is not in being different than the norm, but in trying to force something that isn't right for you — sacrificing, not in a noble way but a harmful way, who you are, remaining in a relationship or trying to be something you simply can not be, because that's what's expected regardless of the consequences to your wellbeing.

I think that Dawkins has some good points about religion being harmful.

If you think that a group led prayer is not harmful, you haven't considered it from the other side.

I think one can be an anti-theist if they perceive religious belief as inherently harmful to society and have no further agenda than that specific opinion.

Still thinking of discipline in terms of child care, it becomes apparent, however, that the best prevention is education whenever it can be achieved that is, that the child who can learn to anticipate consequences for himself is in a much better position to avoid harmful misconduct than the child who relies wholly on external admonitions.

The knowledge we have today can't be compared to ancient harmful and ignorant myths, although I admit that being ignorant must feel very comfortable for some and I think people are free and have the right to be stupid, but no one has the right to make it sound as though their personal nonsense is the universal and inflexible truth.

You say «I consider myself an anti-theist in that I think in the end theism is harmful to society.»

I just think in the end theism is harmful and does little to nothing to further the human cause.

I consider myself an anti-theist in that I think in the end theism is harmful to society.

Do you think that might be harmful to the kids to hear their mother labelled such wrongfully?

But I think there is a big difference in stating what you believe, and stating what you believe and adding how ridicules, harmful, absurd, and life - wasting you think my beliefs areâ $ ¦ with a smirk.

I believe that people deserve the right to practice whatever religion they want without fear of consequences, but I still think religion is harmful.

I think that any belief held without reason is harmful.

The «therapeutic», man - centred mentality which has infected much moral thinking since the 1940s has become a dogmatic insistence that the only really harmful thing is «repression» and that children willbe more healthy, the more «open» they are about sex and sexual activity.

That is why Isaac Peebles in the 19th century thought it was wrong for people to sing during a train ride; and why it is wrong to race our cars through the streets, stereos cranked high enough to be sure that everyone we pass has the opportunity to enjoy the music we happen to like; and why it was wrong for Cohn to wear his jacket; and why it is wrong for racists to burn crosses (another harmful act of self - expression that the courts have protected under the First Amendment).

On the contrary, one enthusiast, admitting that such activity could be increased said that she didn't think that this was necessarily harmful - she spoke instead of the value of removing taboos and seeing sex as «valuable and life - enhancing», an odd expression to come from one associated with provision of abortion.

(But when people start telling us why they think being gay is harmful, I'm not sure that will end the yelling — it's much more personal and could be even more heated as we feel slurred by people who have no first, and sometimes even no second - hand, experience of what it means and what it is like to be gay.)

-- Although if you said it was harmful to them and had convincing, objective reasons for thinking so, they might listen.)

The thing is, I think once we make that shift, the «debate» is over because our lives stand as a testament to the fact that being gay isn't harmful, or, to put it a better way, isn't any less beneficial than being straight.

we think the idea that god is real and watching us is a bad and harmful one, with obviously harmful consequences.

Tragically, this rush to reconciliation will often guilt the victim into thinking that the harmful effects of the abuse are a result of his / her own spiritual weaknesses or failures and that a «godly response to abuse» requires the embrace of the offender while minimizing the effects of the abuse.

Colloquially, any thought, word, or act considered immoral, selfish, shameful, harmful, or alienating might be termed «sinful».

But please don't ask me to be quiet about their ideas, because frankly, I think there are a mega-ton of «Christian» ideas out there that are actually harmful, damaging, abusive, and even cruel to the human being and to community.

A time when we still thought it was ok to test harmful medical experiments on mentally disabled individuals.

I think there is a lot of corporate culture that isn't helpful for the Church, the verdict is still out on if it is consistantly harmful.

And it's not lLAZY to allow someone else to form core your beliefs?Do you think it's EASY to look on in frustration when you have something you disagree with thrown in your face everywhere you look?Do you think we are CHEAP when we are asked to allow legal tax evasion for a thing we think is ridiculous and harmful?

I don't think there's an «external morality,» but I DO think that there are actions that are harmful to the advancement of society and quality of life, which unnecessarily increase human suffering.

i think the ways the church traditionally labeled sin is not only outdated but harmful.

As important as it is to challenge Christian leaders when what they say is harmful or untrue, I'm realizing that in the context of social media, I may need to be more careful because I have more power than I think.

Even though he calls out Millennials» BS, I personally think their BS is far less harmful than ours.

I think to make clones is harmful for the unique person.

I think the notion that faith requires an absolute belief is harmful.

If you are offended that they've been «attacked» by their own words, then you must think their words are harmful to them.