Sentences with phrase «think at least some readers»

I think at least some readers will agree that they can remember a time or times in their life when their own beliefs were strong, yet something contextually held them back from acting on those beliefs.

Not exact matches

Beyond that, this blog is for you, the reader at large, and I hope that I can challenge and engage you to think about issues in different ways or at least get you to argue about my thinking on them.

They allow the poem to be utterly serious when its author wants it to be (one can not imagine such playfulness being allowed in the climactic visions of Paradiso XXXIII), and they allow readers to think that Dante is at least as sane as they are.

The confessional author invites readers into his or her intimate life and most - private thoughts — at least, into all the intimacy and privacy that he or she wishes to make public.

The second half (it's only 188 pages long) gets more challenging, but I think most educated readers would still find be able to follow his treatment of the physics, as far as he intended it to be followed, at least.

I have known Hogan for many years and think your readers should at least know about him.

I hope this at least gets you started and I hope other readers chime in with their thoughts.

I have to say (and I think most Lunch Tray readers would agree), you seem to be doing very well in terms of your children's acceptance of vegetables (at least in comparison to what goes on in my own home).

I have had your blog in my reader for a while but ever since you switched over your website (or at least I think that's when it started) I no longer get informed when a new article is posted, I only get informed when people leave comments.

I think it's important to be able to post at least twice a week, readers don't want to show up and see content from last week.

Sally, I think you should enable the «upload a picture» feature on your Discus comments (I know it is there on other sites at least), so your readers can share photos that apply to the topics we are commenting on!

Because I really think this might be helpful for at least some of my readers.

Because her thinking man's Ilsa act in The Reader is at least conceptually riskier than her put - upon dishrag Debbie Downer in Revolutionary Road, we were that close to throwing her by the wayside in this category, especially because there's a clearly superior crypto - leading role in the mix (Rosemarie DeWitt, whose titular character in Rachel Getting Married has been shut out of a lot of races thus far, but we feel anyone who actually watches enough of the film to justify throwing their vote toward frontrunner Anne Hathaway should have no other choice but to recognize DeWitt's equally tricky, equally attention - stealing performance).

That was fine but they were also enrolling them in the KOLL and that pissed off readers because they thought they were buying an entire book, or at least the first act of a book, only to discover they had, at most, a scene or a chapter.

If you're prone to writing too concise or dropping transitions, I think it's actually better to have at least one beta reader outside your own demographic and ideally unfamiliar with your genre (though you don't want someone who'll be bored or something).

I think one of the purposes of using Ginny's voice throughout the book was for the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the autism spectrum (at least Ginny's place on it) and interacting with someone who is on the spectrum.

But none in the traditional publishing arena, because, however lousy one reader or another may think a trad - pubbed book, at the very least SOMEBODY liked it besides the author.

Paul — I think an author needs to blog at least once a month to keep on the radar of fans and blog readers.

I like to think that at least some aspects of my books stay with readers after they've moved on.

If he or she wants readers to fully enter the story, and come away feeling richer for that, then I think likability matters; likable doesn't mean perfect, but I need to connect with a character in a positive way at least some of the time.

I want at least a 10 inch e reader and I think many share the same.

At $ 10 — $ 15 per month I think plenty of avid ebook readers would be willing to sign up, because they're probably already buying at least one ebook at retail prices each montAt $ 10 — $ 15 per month I think plenty of avid ebook readers would be willing to sign up, because they're probably already buying at least one ebook at retail prices each montat least one ebook at retail prices each montat retail prices each month.

When character actions or plot developments come out of left field without proper setup, readers will know (or at least surmise) that you didn't think it all the way through.

I mainly wanted to make the point that i think that somebody needs to make an Android - based e-ink reader with at least a single core 1ghz processor, 512k ram, and a 10 ″ or larger display size.

You honestly think publishing isn't going to change at least as much in the coming 20 years, especially in ways that make efficient, reasonable book shopping possible again for readers?

I don't usually post on blogs (even my own) but I agree with this post, for I can say, without doubt, I would not have spent four years, thousands of dollars, and countless hours on The Phantom of the Earth if (1) I thought for an instant that someone out there could prevent my work from making its way to readers; (2) that there wasn't a global support system that would enable me to put forward a professional product; and (3) that readers weren't at least open to trying out a new, self - published author.

Yes, you definitely have to be able to write stories that keep people entertained, though I think it takes a few books for most readers to really get into an author, regardless, so I definitely encourage writers to think of penning a series or at least numerous stand - alone titles!

Seeing the title of this post, I didn't expect much, but I was thinking «at least it'll probably be running a newer Android so I can finally run Moon Reader Pro after rooting.»

They all respect their readers, do their very best to produce work that resonates with them, in many cases put out a LOT of books before they hit (I think Hugh had 7 out before Wool gained traction, and I know HM Ward had at least a dozen out, Melissa had 5 or 6, Elle had 10 or so, I had 10 or 11, etc. etc. etc.), and kept at it, trying new things, changing gears when necessary, and never wasting their time with idiocy that had no impact on their craft or their sales.

Some writers think I'm crazy for sharing my work as it is written, but I feel like this is a great way for readers and new writers to see how the process (at least mine) really works.

Between that history, my own observations and hundreds of reader comments on the topic over the years, there are at least five reasons I can think of that e-readers are here to stay and grow over the coming years, as Juniper says.

The Digital Reader also offers six different points of view regarding KU, which are mostly mixed and seem to point towards experimenting and seeing what happens (though at least one person thinks the pricing structure could devalue books).

Occasional sales are fine, but I think if you change price a lot, or go on / off free a lot, you mess with reader expectations (at least the loyal readers, the ones who are paying attention).

I think that although the publishers probably target the bookstores more than the readers, I know of at least some traditionally published authors who definitely focus on their readers and make a point to connect to them via their blog or Twitter and do giveaways with both ARCs and copies after the publication date.

I do think you have a problem with your plan, though, because the cost of printing your book via POD is going be at least $ 7.00, and since there's a real limit to what readers will pay for fiction, this alone will eliminate virtually all your profit after you discount the book for retail.

Just a thought from a heavy reader — I read at least 200 books a year.

We don't think an Amazon monopoly in publishing is good for readers and there are also at least 25 percent of the digital reading market who don't have Kindles but some other device.

I think short fiction is what consumers want, at least consumers who don't consider themselves normally readers of fiction.

Like I said, I don't think my series has enough of the popular tropes to really kill it (and I already gave away over 1500 copies of Book 1 to my regular readers), but I'm crossing my fingers that it will at least do well enough that I won't regret having «genre hopped» instead of buckling down and writing more fantasy.

I think that if you are passionate about your book (and it's a good read), friends / family / trusted readers will automatically become ambassadors for it (at least you hope so!).

I think it's also important to point out that in many of these conversations (not that it will necessarily happen in this one), people will often assume that no one reads books anymore, but in reality, that vast majority of American adults read at least one book a year -LSB-(75 % according to a Pew Study)-RSB-(http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/06/25/library-readers-book-type/) and the median number of books read was 5 in 2013, so I don't think we can say that school is turning kids off reading, because most of them grow up to be adult readers.

I'd also like to hear at least one person start a discussion on the themes in the novel, because if people are discussing themes then I must have done my job to get the readers thinking.

Anyone who has caught a retrospective of Marlene Dumas, including Reinhardt's Daughter, will know at least one thing more than Corris's readers: Reinhardt had a daughter (although Dumas is, as usual, thinking of herself).

I would like to improve understanding of the science, and your claims notwithstanding, I mostly do --(at least the readers of my book think so!).

You may not accept any of the above, if you think you know better, I bring it to the inquisitive readers» attention to consider at least as a thought provoking, which is only first step in a aspiration to find out more.

To be non RC - ish, I think you have to say why its trash or at least give a powerful hint, not just «an exercise left up to the reader».

They aim to outright deceive the reader — or at least get him thinking that with so much «controversy» then he might as well put the climate / AGW issue on the backburner «cos it seems nobody knows what the hell's going on.

Since Watts has encouraged his readers to crack it, I'd think at least one would try a dictionary attack.

Aaron: I think how it translates, how it ties into kind of the Gary Vaynerchuk model and how it's useful for lawyers to at least think about how they could be doing some stuff is there is now this trend in Facebook, Instagram videos of 1 to 2 minute videos with interesting video content and overlaid text that's kind of rapid fire overlaid text and you can convey by combining interesting visual content with well written but very short text content, you can convey a fair amount of information in just dozens of words, not even hundreds or thousands, and those at least in the current of multimedia online content are the kinds of things that are performing really well on the internet do a great job of conveying a small amount of information and are interesting for readers and catch them where they are because it is absolutely a fact that no one wants to read a law firm's full length press release about a case they won or an award an attorney got or whatever.

But given that Slaw has so many international readers who may not be following our local news, I thought it imperative to at least mention it.