Sentences with phrase «think authors do»

I think authors don't place much value in blogs and think there's little value in getting their book out there and building their reader base.

I think the author does bring up some very valid points.

Tandamonium As an agnostic, a wife of an Active Duty Marine for over 20 years and mother of two Active Duty Marines, I thought the author did a great job getting to the nuance of the reason behind the decision and also on giving some insight into Anabaptists.

I liked the unique subject matter - a chid who is born carrying the soul of another child recently deceased - and I thought the author did a very good job of presenting different storylines and then tying them all together.

I thought the author did a good job of conveying the problems of living with a conquering army that spoke a foreign language and trying to sort out who was and who was not guilty of war crimes.

I use literary analysis to explain what I think the author did poorly.

I think the author did a good job of conveying the love she felt, but as she reached middle school and high school years, the protection of her parents also protected her.

I think the author did a great job of showing how a small town can be too small - everyone knows too much about their neighbors, few places to «get away from it all» - to be invisible.

I think the author did a great job with this story and I was glad I won this book.

I wasn't terribly surprised to learn that he was the rapist, but I think the author did a fine job of developing suspense.

I think the author did a great job with this story and I was g

I think the author did a pretty darn good job of building up to it with true finesse.

I thought the author did a great job of conveying her artist's eye in that way — and, in the «catalog» descriptions of what we later find out are Maud's paintings, we see that she has learned to bring this to her work.

I thought the author did a great job of illustrating those traits in Ginny.

We all carry our childhood with us throughout our life... some things are buried deeply... some things we take out to remember frequently... Paula was a survivor, a chameleon... she learned to create new personas that fit the changing circumstances of her life by watching her mother react to life... I thought the author did an excellent job of contrasting Paula and Julian in light of their very different childhood experiences... Paula was a closed up prickly cactus... a dessert survivor... all hard, sharp edges that protected the true inner core of her... Julian was an open succulent... soft, sensitive to his nurturing environment... accepting and giving... like plants and animals, human beings adapt to their environment and when are we most open to learning?

I think the author did a masterful job in keeping the reader hooked.I loved the way the relationship with Phinneaus hampered the progression of her RA and enabled Alice to deal with what she eventually learned.

I think the author did a lot of research, and I appreciated the subtle historical references that went along with the life story.

I recommend this book highly, and think the authors did a good job in being realistic about China and its financial economy.

But I do think the author does deserve a right of reply to these comments.

After reading the paper I really think the authors did an excellent job of presenting a fair account and of keeping the hype to a bare minimum.

I like it, and I think the author did a stellar job collecting and distilling a lot of great information!

Not exact matches

«I do think Microsoft's software has a bit to do with it,» wrote the study's author, Bruce D. Temkin.

Instead, the authors describe recently discovered remains that suggest the first Homo sapiens showed up more than 100,000 years earlier than we thought in a place many experts didn't suspect.

If you don't think you're in line to win a Nobel, the study authors say the concept still holds for other great achievements — people tend to do their most outstanding work in middle age.

The author reminds us to keep thinking big, never be afraid to ask for things, and to not be intimidated when things don't go as planned.

Author's note: I wrote this column on Monday, November 7th, thinking — as so many did — that Hillary Clinton would win the U.S. election.

The authors don't claim this is a negative development; instead they liken it to the «group thinking» of a large office, where people know who on their team has the knowledge they need.

But the agreement didn't guarantee McDougal the articles she thought she had secured — it only gave American Media Inc. «the right to identify» her as the author of the articles, meaning they were not required to accept her columns.

«I don't think people understand that entrepreneurs do not start companies to become rich,» says Roberts, an entrepreneur who has also authored a superb paper on the emotional toll of entrepreneurial transitions.

And let me preface that by saying that I've often observed that of all the professions who also are authors, I do think that doctors are the best, if you look through history — Chekov and on and on.

Do I personally agree with the author, to some extent, I think the 1 / 10th rule is a bit extreme almost to the point of being silly but at the same time I am a vocal advocate of living below your means so whatever gets the job done.

I don't think the authors of similar sized sites would be as responsive and interactive is I am.

-- Todd Henry, author of The Accidental Creative «This book is more than a «how to» guide, it's a «how they did it» guide that should persuade anyone thinking about starting a business that they don't need a fortune to make one.»

The authors put the case this way: «Think about the deepest joy you experience in life — it doesn't typically come from thinking about how great you are.

Who do you think the author of couple coming together to wed?

I just didn't understand the list (I thought it was a list of places the author was from, you know, like Chanel: Paris, New York, London in the advertisements!).

The key is the fact that the author was listening to the patient and not telling them what to think or do.

I'm not sure what sources the author used to draw her conclusion but I think she needs to do further reseach.

Don't you think that the lurid fantasy / sci - fi (or crazed, hallucinating) author of Revelation read (or heard about) the book of Daniel?

«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»

As I said above, most NT scholars do not think that Peter authored Peter 2 where that stamp of approval appears, Theo.

most NT scholars do not think that Peter authored Peter 2 where that stamp of approval appears, Theo.

Of course most NT scholars find good reason to think that Peter did not author Peter 2, where Peter allegedly deems Paul's works as divine scripture.

Another interesting thing to consider is, do you think the authors believed in the God they were writing about?

To those who are so offended the author t!tled the article to christians: I think you do protest too much.

we tend to think that doctrine = theory, when in fact doctrine in New Testament authors mind does not even exist as mere theory.

As anyone familiar with my own work will expect, I have many serious reservations about this book, the most inclusive being that I do not think the author helps either the nonbeliever or the believer to understand the problem of faith and New Testament criticism.

I don't think the various Gospel authors had Jesus asking question to show he did not know, nor to say «my peace is in the questions» but instead as a mere rhetorical tool to make a point and tell what he thought the answers were.

The author of the review thinks this book sinks under its own weight, for its author makes no secret of his loathing of the whole homosexual community, quoting every passage in the bible that can even remotely be translated against them, often twisting passages to say what they do not mean.

I don't run in the speaker / author minor celebrity circles and so you need to apologize to me I think because you just falsely accused me of «assaulting your character for years.»