«The widespread belief now in the Labour party that whilst Jeremy is a good man with great Labour values who has done a lot for this party and
I think changed the debate in this country about our economy, he's been right about lots of things,» he said.
Not exact matches
Black has also said he
thinks his proposed refinery, by providing permanent jobs and economic benefits to British Columbians hitherto wary of oil exports, «will
change the
debate on the pipeline.»
Take our poll below and let us know who you
think won, who performed better on the economy and national security, and whether the
debate changed your mind.
This post about the Suzuki - Pembina report is a case in point: both sides of the
debate seemed to
think that I was offering aid and succor to the cause of the climate
change deniers.
I hear the current
debate about the 1 % vs the 99 % and everybody giving their fair share, and how to balance the budget, and so on, and I just
think that no matter what, nothing will
change until people from the top to the bottom become less greedy.
I
thought the
debate was silly for the longest time until I started befriending calvinists and it started to
change.
Mike i have been
thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i
think we will get into a good
debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even
thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they
change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz
I have always
thought that the global warming, or «climate
change»
debate, was as much about social psychology as science.
I read this article by charisma magazine which i
thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This
debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have authority over men or teach in the church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i
think times are
changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy
thinking.
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast
thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and
debate the issue with bold
Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a
change MR is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast
thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and
debate the issue with bold
If it where just possible to take these statistics, and sit down face to face with PGMOB, the FA and some media hacks, on a public forum, and ask them to explain them, along with the coincidence of how things
changed following game 50 and Riley's subsequent appointment, I
think that would make for a very interesting
debate, especially if video evidence was allowed.
But I do
think that no matter what side of the traditional education
debate you're on, we can envision that things can be different, that we can take different approaches and things can
change.
The difference being that
debate is focused on
changing the other person's practices or
thoughts..
It's this sort of sloppy
thinking that informs a lot of the Climate
Change debate unfortunately.
Two best political books I read this were «Nixonland» by Rich Perlstein (which covers the eclipse of American liberalism and rise of conservatism between 1964 - 1972) and «The Persistence of Poverty» by Charles Karelis, which is short, witty and will
change the way that you
think about the whole
debate around welfare and poverty issues (get»em on Amazon if they aren't in the shops).
One member of the audience told us his vote has now
changed as a result of the
debate: «I
think Vince Cable came out on top... I was going to vote Labour, potentially Tory, but now I'm definitely going to vote Lib Dem so for me it worked.»
«I
think the whole
debate is
changing,» Mr. de Blasio said today at the offices of DC 37, the largest municipal union.
DeFrancisco said he
thinks it's «healthy» for the state GOP to have a
debate about making
changes in advance of a crucial election year.
(You might
think that last week's discovery of an extra # 10bn down the back of the Office for National Statistics sofa might
change the terms of this
debate, but it won't.)
Climate
change scepticism is not official party policy, but Wilson has stated: «I
think in 20 years» time we will look back at this whole climate
change debate and ask ourselves how on earth were we ever conned into spending the billions of pounds which are going into this without any kind of rigorous examination of the background, the science, the implications of it all.»
«I
thought it was a completely useless label that led nowhere in any serious
debate, both about the partnership that we need to have with business, but also how business needs to
change.»
And together, they've helped produce the sterile «lock «em up» or «let «em out»
debate that I
think has often got in the way of real
change.
If you were
thinking of voting for Chris Allen's opponent prior to the
debate, take a look at that
debate on TV - 23, Lighthouse television, and you will very likely
change your mind.
«I
think it's an important
debate this and I don't rule out
changes.
The fundamental difference in opinion (which has not
changed since Michaels and Hansen started
debating each other in 1988) is that Hansen (and the vast majority of relevant experts)
think that climate sensitivity (how much the globe will warm under a doubling of CO2) is around 3 (+ / -1) °C, while Michaels
thinks that it is much less (< 1 °C).
I actually went to go Christmas shopping in this look after I snapped some pictures and
debated changing at first and then
thought you know what, who cares because all that matters is I feel damn good wearing this outfit right now.
She added: «I
think that the education
debate on grammar schools has been going for a very long time, but I also recognise that the landscape in which it takes place has
changed fundamentally.
LCN design was about taking those sorts of
debates down into schools and communities so that teachers, students and families could
think carefully about the
changes they were
thinking about making.
Our plan is grounded in the following two premises: 1) When purposefully synchronized with one another across multiple forms of media («cross-media»), children's and adolescents» exposure to high quality youth - oriented social and ethical story content, i.e. stories of substance specifically about character development, compassion, and courage (CCC), is a powerful way to promote youth academic achievement and ethical values; 2) Especially if these stories, told and «read» across media, in their various genres (human interest, biography, history and historical fiction, civic engagement, coming of age, social
change, spiritual awakening, moral issues, etc.), are «taught» by «educators» (broadly defined) using an «evidence - based» pedagogy that A) makes use of peer to peer, and adult facilitated group discussion and
debate as a primary form of instruction, and B) takes advantage of access to the texts of the story that are made available cross-media (narratives, scripts, videos, etc.) to foster students» critical
thinking and ethical reflection skills.
This summer in The Global Search for Education, we bring back our popular 2012 Education
Debate series and put these questions and others to
thought leaders at the forefront of educational
change.
In The Global Search for Education, we bring back our popular 2012 Education
Debate series and put these questions and others to
thought leaders at the forefront of educational
change.
Doug Reeves suggests that leaders start the conversation with a discussion of the principles on which all stakeholders can agree; make clear what will not
change under the new grading policy; be accurate in their risk analysis; and engage in systems
thinking to reframe the grading
debate from «my grading policies for my classroom» to a collegial responsibility for the decisions of every teacher and administrator in the system.
This mix of ideas has
changed the way we
think about education, but largely failed to bring serious improvements in student performance; and the
debate is clearly running out of steam.
The second is that the Guild
thought that their post — in essence an attempt to say that they have prominent members on both sides of the «petition
debate» — would put across a strong message about the organization's character
changing.
Whichever you
think, one thing doesn't
change in this
debate.
Only then can you tackle your big
thoughts, whether you're
debating over taking a new job or you need to make some other significant
change in your life.
The idea of student loan forgiveness has always been taken in one of two ways: An amazing policy that will help usher in a new wave of highly educated, unburdened workers, or an enormous cost for taxpayers and an ineffective policy.Whichever you
think, one thing doesn't
change in this
debate.
I've made some
changes obviously, but I
think debating whether there's a cheaper flight — somewhere, sometime, some other carrier — is beside the point.
I would like to
think that from here on, updates will be limited and
changes will be calculated (basically: bug fixes, and balance adjustments that have been carefully
debated and agreed upon by the overwhelming majority of the community), as opposed to experimental, unnecessary, and sometimes seriously stupid.
Some of the
changes EA Vancouver is implementing are sure to spark heated
debate, but when the dust settles, we'll all be playing the latest version, enjoying it, and
thinking: there's no going back.
Top 10 Xbox One Games Ok we all have favorite games and maybe my list isn't the same of your but my top 10 is up for
debate please leave a comment and tell us what you
think you would
change....
«I'd like this to start a
debate and the way to do that was to collaborate with others, using the photographs as a catalyst for people to
think about the
change around us.
«I don't want to get into the
debate about climate
change, but I will simply point out that I
think in academia we all agree that the temperature on Mars is exactly as it is here.
Mr. Gore: Mr. President, we are facing a planetary emergency, and I really
think it's time that the U.S. reengages in the international
debate on climate
change.
Anyone who
thinks that there is any genuine «
debate» about either the reality of anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate
change, or the grave threat not only to human civilization but to all life on earth if unmitigated, «business as usual» anthropogenic global warming and consequent climate
change are permitted to continue, is profoundly misinformed.
Environmental groups in the climate
change regulation
debate rely more on accurate science than on negative spin, and I
think this is a validation of Realclimates use of accurate science.
As a matter of common decency and journalistic ethics, we ask everyone in the climate
change debate to sit back and
think about what just happened.
In the talk, Victor, trained in political science, warns against focusing too much on trying to defeat those denying the widespread view that greenhouse - driven climate
change is a clear and present danger, first explaining that there are many kind of people engaged at that end of the global warming
debate — including camps he calls «shills» (the professional policy delayers), «skeptics» (
think Freeman Dyson) and «hobbyists.»
«Researching Don't Even
Think About It, which I see as the most important book published on climate
change in the past few years, George Marshall discovered that there has not been a single proposal,
debate or even position paper on limiting fossil fuel production put forward during international climate negotiations.