I think the death penalty is the answer for those that commit crimes such as murder.
Perhaps counter-intuitively, and certainly contrary to what many religious people might suggest,
I think the death penalty would be least problematic in a genuinely religious society.
Not exact matches
There are a lot of people who are opposed to the
death penalty not because they
think no one ever deserves to die for their crimes, but because they
think the government shouldn't have the power to hand out such a punishment, even when that punishment is justified.
I was personally opposed to the
death penalty, and yet I
think I have probably asked for the
death penalty more than most people in the United States.
So I
think more provincial courts will choose not to use the
death penalty.»
If justice is to be applauded (and I
think it is) and the
death penalty is the appropriate level of justice for murder (and I
think it is) then I'm not sure why we should not applaud a politician when they have done their duty.
Just a
thought on the side:
death penalty?
There are Christians in the US who
think heresy and blasphemy should carry the
death penalty, because it says so in the Bible.
Here, I
think, John Paul II's joining of abortion with the
death penalty in Evangelium Vitae is exactly right: A culture that can not bring itself to rescind its license of murder in the womb is unlikely to understand the proper ways in which justice should be done.
We aren't allowed to express such
thoughts without a
penalty of
death from this religion, but I am a bit tired of hearing people project benevolent qualities upon Islam which do not exist.
There are of course further issues with capital punishment, like the number of innocent people who have been executed by our gov «t. I would
think anyone on the «sanct!ty of life» bandwagon would necessarily be against the
death penalty for that reason alone.
Broken you are not going to hell Jesus dealt with this issue in john 8: 1 - 11 everyone
thinks this was the sin of adultery but it actually on all sinners as we all are condemned under the law we all are sinners we all have sinned and will sin and the
penalty for our sin is
death everyone of us.But when we accept Jesus that
penalty is paid for all of us if we believe in him.
Instead of being engulfed by hatred and revengeful
thoughts, however, Son forgave the shooter, petitioned for his release from the
death penalty, and adopted him as his son.
the Bible does judge a lot of things as deserving of the
death penalty if we are to follow ur
thinking it hates all humans.
There is, moreover, no reason to have any confidence that making a media event of an execution will engender clear and careful
thought about the meaning of the
death penalty.
Ed: I
think people know you for some of those issues... But probably one place with the most evident the difference between you and your church would be in the
death penalty.
Researchers have asked evangelicals what they
think about same - sex marriage, science, the
death penalty, immigration, and, especially, whom they plan to vote for in the upcoming election.
First, I don't
think the analogy comparing the
death penalty to legal abortion access works.
21 (12, 15 - 17), 22 (19 f.), and 31 (15b) but
thought to be an original and ancient unit, in which series the
death penalty is assigned when comparable offenses in other codes are less drastically punished.13 But the
death penalty in these cases serves generally to underline the moral and religious seriousness of the covenant community, and in the Israelite scale it in no wise conflicts with the pattern of law which places human life above all other values save two: the sacredness of family and the integrity of Yahweh.
At the end of the day I
think there are a lot of reasons to be against the
death penalty, but for a Christian who believes that Jesus died to spare us from
death and this idea of grace or as Scripture says «mercy triumphs over judgement.»
Religion and the
Death Penalty, which emerged from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, and Millard Lind's The Sound of Sheer Silence and the Killing State offer much to extend and challenge
thinking about capital punishment.
I would
think, however, that Genesis 9:6 would be included on any shortlist of
death -
penalty verses.
I remember a conversation I had with a Hindu co-worker who
thought Christianity was opposed to the
death penalty and I had to explain to him there were two basically two views on it.
«I remember a number of issues in the past where there was strong public support — the
death penalty — the speaker opposed it... It's not about governing from the polls, it's about doing what you
think is the correct thing to do.»
The European rejection of the
death penalty, which advocates of abolishing the
death penalty in the United States cite as evidence of an emerging international consensus that ought to influence our Supreme Court, is related both to the past overuse of it by European nations (
think of the executions for petty larceny in eighteenth - century England, the Reign of Terror in France, and the rampant employment of the
death penalty by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union) and to the less democratic cast of European politics, which makes elite opinion more likely to override public opinion there than in the United States [emboldening mine].
He's compared the position to the one his father, Mario Cuomo, held on the
death penalty, pointing out a majority of New Yorkers supported the
death penalty at the time, but the elder Cuomo held firm, because he
thought it was the right thing to do.
I
think linking the success tax to the
death penalty is a very good idea.
I
think we should give justice to the small number of pedestrians killed each year by dangerous cycling by applying the same or similar
penalties to that of causing
death by dangerous driving and causing
death by careless, or inconsiderate, driving.
He told his interrogators what he
thought of Prohibition (against, though he didn't drink), the
death penalty (against, at least some of the time), and abortion (for, up to a certain point in the pregnancy).
To, [what] I
thought the most sophisticated level was, one of the doctors who participated was against the
death penalty; but he
thought right through the problem he was faced with, he observed a couple of executions before he gave any kind of answer, and he felt that, you know, if people are going to be executed, and that's not going to be stopped, that he would help to make sure that this person doesn't suffer.
Here are five reasons why that's the wrong way to
think about the
death penalty.
«As a result, your approach to social relationships and the emotions you have toward role models, teachers, and peers will change the way you
think about non-social concepts like math or democracy or political issues like the
death penalty.
«I don't
think the issue has anything to do with the
death penalty or abortion,» Desetti said.
On the other hand persuasive essay about
death penalty seeks to convince your readers towards a certain school of
thought.
For example, you may argue against
death penalty and provide reasons why you
think it should be abolished.
She often turns the spotlight on us readers, forcing to
think about how we
think of those around us... - sandrah Do you believe in the
death penalty?
Two of my best teachers were my exceedingly shy and fearful retriever and my macho terrier who
thought that the
death penalty was a totally appropriate way to deal with an unruly cat.
Nor do I
think tobacco denialists are guilty enough to warrant the
death penalty, in spite of the enormous number of
deaths that resulted more or less directly from tobacco denialism.
«Do you
think it would make any difference if the ABA were to change its neutral position and come out for abolishing the
death penalty?»
My heart was pounding so hard you'd have
thought it was a
death penalty case.
For example, Stevens's
thoughts on his opinion in the 2008 Baze v. Rees capital punishment case seemed, for the first time I've seen, to dispel the notion that Stevens is inching toward an absolute rejection of the
death penalty as his time on the Court nears an end.
Near one of the mansion's four fireplaces, the cross-eyed governor had served decaffeinated coffee in beautiful old buffalo - themed china and asked Walters his
thoughts on abortion, the
death penalty, and whether he believed adhering to the actual language of the law and the original meaning of the Constitution.
The adoption of the Infanticide Act, 1922 was intended to remedy the fact that judges and juries were reticent to convict a mother who killed her newborn of murder since she necessarily faced the
death penalty... It was
thought to be a crime mostly committed by «illegitimate mothers» trying to hide their shame, a motive which the general opinion
thought lessened the heinousness of the crime.
But I
think few would - be killers, especially teenagers, would
think «I won't commit this crime if there's a small chance I'll get the
death penalty; but I will do it if all it means is that I'll get life without parole.»
A
death penalty opponent, Feingold said: «I found a person who actually
thought about it deeply, who was troubled by innocent people being sentenced to
death, and who gave particular concern to how those cases were handled as a Court of Appeals judge.»
Doug, why do you
think it's a good thing for the Federal Government to be pursuing the
death penalty in cases where the state does not?
Turning from coverage of the detention of enemy combatants to coverage of the
death penalty, at «Sentencing Law and Policy» Doug Berman offers «A few quick
thoughts on Marsh.»