That's no fun, at least if
you think discussion and debate, rather than dollars and cents, should drive policy creation.
Not exact matches
I'm not sure I would necessarily agree with everything they're coming up with, but I
think it's really important to have these
debates and discussions and to put a fire under our governmental decision makers to sort this stuff out.
Imagine a meeting with less I
think we should
debating going on
and more
discussion on how we need to help existing customers
and prospective buyers get from here to there.
Let's have honest, open
discussions and quite allowing people to shut down the
debate so that people can determine for themselves what to
think / believe.
I was going to post a comment but
thought better of it... There is little room here for respectfull
and educated
discussion or
debate.
But the charge puts me in mind of the colloquium
discussion in the January issue of First Things which treated the
debate between so - called «liberal»
and «radical» Catholics, perhaps because my contribution to that
discussion has elicited similar accusations of political irresponsibility or moral cowardice from people sympathetic to the liberal line of
thought.
I found Mgr Burke's article on justice to be a very relevant
and thought - provoking topic of
debate and discussion for our society at the moment.
You say you don't know gods will because to try
and think like god is too hard (which for the record I
think is a cop out in any
debate or
discussion about god that I understand you really believe it
and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts
discussion from there)
You say you don't know gods will because to try
and think like god is too hard (which for the record I
think is a cop out in any
debate or
discussion about god that I understand you really believe it
and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts
discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.
I wouldn't
think this precludes me from
discussion and, most importantly,
debate.
The only reason we limit the
discussion to the so - called «side A»
and «side B»
debate is because, as Cindy mentions above, the most you could ever squeeze out of Scripture is a prohibition on same - sex acts (which I still
think takes quite a bit of squeezing).
Mike i have been
thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i
think we will get into a good
debate /
discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even
thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn
and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn
and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz
We can
and should
debate theology
and doctrine, but we must never
think that we are the infallible interpreters of Scripture
and determiners of people's destiny,
and should also remember that doctrine, as important as it is, becomes evil when
debates and discussions about theology keep us from living out the loving gospel in tangible ways to a hurting
and dying world.
I also
think it appropriate for them to cite those reasons in public
discussions and debates about those political issues.
I
think it's pretty stupid when folks (christians, mostly) want to insult
and go on tirades but they won't have an honest
discussion or
debate if you paid them in gold bullion to do it.
Instead of responding with the traditional
and easy «You will
think and do as we say because we're your parents» routine, we interpreted those embryonic expressions of defiance as opportunities for
discussion, dialog
and even
debate.
However, when it comes to killing newborns, our academic culture
thinks it a topic worthy of
discussion and debate.
I
think its important to remember that there are no winners in these type of
debates /
discussions, everyone has a separate view / opion
and rightly so.
Then, for 50 minutes, the young men talked, with Bailys loosely guiding the conversation around the theme of what it takes to go «outside of the box» in your
thinking and decision - making — a topic that was broad enough to encompass both a
discussion about what it might feel like to leave Illinois for college
and a long
debate about the experience that Rashid, one of the group members, had had the previous weekend, when he was jumped by two guys while he was walking from his grandmother's house to a convenience store to buy M&M's.
But I didn't vote in favor because I necessarily
think that introducing helmets into the women's game is a good idea (as anyone who follows the sport of women's lacrosse knows, the issue has been the subject of furious
and often heated
debate in recent years, well - chronicled in a recent article on the US Lacrosse's website, which also contains a very helpful
discussion of how the ASTM standard now being voted on was developed).
I'm only wandering on such websites to send people home to their kids
and tell them to stop wasting time here, building new religions, or get into serious
discussions and debates that consider the pro-s
and con - s of everything
and teach everyone to
think and feel
and behave congruently.
Schaumburg — Chicago Tribune health
and fitness reporter Julie Deardorff's interesting column «Breast - feeding
debate eclipses mom - feeding» (Q, June 25) injected some clear
thinking into the recent media
discussion about the government's Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign.
Chicago Tribune health
and fitness reporter Julie Deardorff's interesting column «Breast - feeding
debate eclipses mom - feeding» (Q, June 25) injected some clear
thinking into the recent media
discussion about the government's Breastfeeding Awareness Campaign.
But I disagree with those who
think conferences have become a meaningless lobby-fest; they are still a great forum for
discussion,
debate and decision - making on policy, as packed - out fringes prove.
He has an obligation to the people to do that, because I
think clearly last night what you saw 12 minutes for each in a very tightly formatted
debate where there wasn't a free flow of
discussions, where there wasn't follow up most of the time,
and there were a lot of topics that wasn't discussed at all
and I
think we need to have that kind of honest
debate.»
«Do I
think there will be
discussions about charter schools
and a robust
debate?
After the
debate, we asked her several questions, including: how she viewed her
debate performance, what she expects the remaining three weeks of the campaign to focus on, for a more detailed
discussion of her unexpected answer that she doesn't see herself as prepared to be mayor
and for more about her statement that she's
thought about running for Public Advocate for the past 20 years.
The
debate may be over, but you can still join in the
discussion: use the hashtag #bfomayordebate
and share your
thoughts on social media.
«
And I think that the voters of the entire state would be better off served if they heard more policy - based arguments and discussion in the debates.&raq
And I
think that the voters of the entire state would be better off served if they heard more policy - based arguments
and discussion in the debates.&raq
and discussion in the
debates.»
«Ultimately, after several months of
debate, I
think that we
and the public can win that
discussion,» said Silver.
I don't
think there should be any subjects that, I know, religion tends to be kind of the elephant in the room very often,
and when you start
debating those kinds of things, but I'm always up for a conversation; which I
think is the most important thing to remember, when you're having a
discussion — with gigantic ironic quotes around it, a «conversation with someone» — is to make it a conversation, not falling into the trap of
thinking the person you're talking to is an idiot, because they might believe something idiotic.
I
think the
debate about whether we should design our children will replace the
debate over abortion in the United States
and become the object of
discussion worldwide.
Amsterdam, Netherlands About Blog RW Connect provides a platform to share the best in research
thinking and methodologies
and offers a podium for
debate and discussion on all topics related to the fields of opinion, social
and market research.
Thought the SOW is designed to last 6 lessons, the level of
discussion and debate provoked means that the SOW is easily extended.
Programme highlights From early years practice to high - level
debates on the provision of music education for all, the programme aimed to provide a balance of practical, advice - led sessions, useful practice - sharing workshops
and discussion to broaden
thinking both on practice
and the broader political context of musical
and cultural education.
I can
think of a number of such ideas — all fashionable — to which
debate and discussion have attached some sort of reality.
There are many opportunities for class
discussions and pupils are encouraged to
debate, to express their own opinions
and to
think more deeply about this topic.
He says, «While this year's judges — again drawn from around the world — have continued the tradition of trying to be honest
and objective in their opinions, doubtless not everyone who reads this list will agree entirely with the judges» decision — but that's the beauty of lists such as this one: it gives ample scope for
thought,
discussion and debate».
Use as a writing response card
Think, pair, share
discussion Would you rather strips for
debating and speaking ideas.
Our plan is grounded in the following two premises: 1) When purposefully synchronized with one another across multiple forms of media («cross-media»), children's
and adolescents» exposure to high quality youth - oriented social
and ethical story content, i.e. stories of substance specifically about character development, compassion,
and courage (CCC), is a powerful way to promote youth academic achievement
and ethical values; 2) Especially if these stories, told
and «read» across media, in their various genres (human interest, biography, history
and historical fiction, civic engagement, coming of age, social change, spiritual awakening, moral issues, etc.), are «taught» by «educators» (broadly defined) using an «evidence - based» pedagogy that A) makes use of peer to peer,
and adult facilitated group
discussion and debate as a primary form of instruction,
and B) takes advantage of access to the texts of the story that are made available cross-media (narratives, scripts, videos, etc.) to foster students» critical
thinking and ethical reflection skills.
You can share your
thoughts on specific articles
and posts, or engage in
discussion and debate through our social media channels
and via the online comment box.
It represents two years of
debate,
discussion and thinking across the education sector about how assessment — particularly, formal assessments taken by 15 - 19 year olds in England — can
and should evolve over the next decade.
«While this year's judges — again drawn from around the world — have continued the tradition of trying to be honest
and objective in their opinions, doubtless not everyone who reads this list will agree entirely with the judges» decision, but that's the beauty of lists such as this one: it gives ample scope for
thought,
discussion,
and debate».
A variety of activities that stimulate students»
thinking, such as Edward de Bonos» Six Thinking Hats and curiosity, Socratic discussions or Buzz groups which will encourage debates and students to discuss and sha
thinking, such as Edward de Bonos» Six
Thinking Hats and curiosity, Socratic discussions or Buzz groups which will encourage debates and students to discuss and sha
Thinking Hats
and curiosity, Socratic
discussions or Buzz groups which will encourage
debates and students to discuss
and share ideas
For example, both the literacy
and math collaboratives recently hosted teacher
debates in which participants engaged in
thought - provoking, passionate
discussions about the pros
and cons of connecting these new strategies to teacher observation
and evaluation systems.
Doug Reeves suggests that leaders start the conversation with a
discussion of the principles on which all stakeholders can agree; make clear what will not change under the new grading policy; be accurate in their risk analysis;
and engage in systems
thinking to reframe the grading
debate from «my grading policies for my classroom» to a collegial responsibility for the decisions of every teacher
and administrator in the system.
Emma Knights explores the latest
thinking in school governance Like a number of binary
debates in English education, the
discussion on skills
and stakeholders that school governance has...
Examples of the instructional
and democratic citizenship benefits of developing these economic reasoning skills in students include: sharpening critical
thinking and critical literacy skills; entertaining multiple perspectives; better understanding current events; laying the groundwork for authentic
discussions and civil
debates; casting informed votes;
and making students»
thinking explicit for assessment purposes.
Join us as we foster innate curiosities, encourage
discussion and debate,
and guide students to
think their own way through to answers.
The switch once the fight has shifted from adoption to implementation creates the impression that these folks make whatever argument they
think will help them prevail in the current
debate rather than relying on principle, evidence,
and intellectually serious policy
discussion.