And another email from one of our readers:
I think dual agency should be illegal, period!
Not exact matches
«I
think Realtors believed that doing away with
dual agency was doing away with double - ending and that's not what they have done,» he says.
Seems you put some
thought into the
dual agency issue.
They delude themselves into
thinking they can conduct
dual agency and achieve that immediate gratification....
If you
think agency disclosure isn't in need of some tinkering, then ask a recent client to explain Limited Dual A
agency disclosure isn't in need of some tinkering, then ask a recent client to explain Limited
Dual AgencyAgency.
i also
think the Act was revised for buyer
agency only to ensure Full Disclosure of previous Dual Agency violations were not required to be explained to the con
agency only to ensure Full Disclosure of previous
Dual Agency violations were not required to be explained to the con
Agency violations were not required to be explained to the consumer.
As for
dual agency, I'm pleased that you
think that way because as far as I'm concerned, and I've stated it many times here in REM, I don't approve of
dual agency i.e., multiple representation as it is now known in Ontario in any fashion and incidentally also state this in the above.
It certainly provides food - for -
thought regarding what an advocate might put forth as warnings for consumers to be considerate of, especially
dual agency pitfalls.
Survey — Real estate attorneys — See what attorneys
think about
dual agency and controlled business arrangements («one stop shopping»).
If your answer is «ask the buyer to sign a limited
dual agency agreement in order to represent both the buyer and the sellers» —
think carefully before deciding to pursue this course of action.