Sentences with phrase «think expert opinion»

What makes you think those expert opinions are not based on empirical data?

Not exact matches

«We love Blekko and think it's a great product — a quality search engine that organically combines search algorithms with expert opinions,» said Yandex CEO Arkady Volozh, who will join Blekko's board of directors, in a statement.

«I think collectively the Vatican feels it has taken a drubbing in the court of public opinion, and it's looking for a media - savvy expert that can turn the ship around,» Allen said.

Rahn... Do i really need to back up what i think online... and you being the expert... why do nt you fully explain to me the state that the country is in... enlighten me... but you already know how far that will go... just as my attempt to change others mind's fell short... so will any others opinion... i have my mind made up for my own well founded reasons... all im saying is that spending all day protesting and postulating is of no benefit to anyone... going about your life and making things best for yourself is in the best interest of this country as a whole... I believe Adam Smith said it best... the best results come from one person doing whats best for himself and the team... not throwing a hissy fit

I add protein to smoothies and drinks maaaaybe once a week, if that, so I certainly don't have an expert opinion on brands, but I do think this one is really yummy if you're looking for a recommendation!

At the end of the day an «expert's» big board is nothing more than an opinion of what they think a specific GM will do.

Your opinion does not reflect the opinion of Arsenal Fans and your absurd article should never been put up on this page Do you Honestly think that publicly criticizing Arsenal and Arsene during a period when the club are struggling is of any benefit when did he become such an expert in football anyway??? let's be honest he's not exactly a picture of Health any more outbursts from Usmanov and there should be banners at the emirates with

Experts have many different opinions, but in general agree that getting the child to think about what he has done wrong, why it was wrong, and the impact the bad behavior had on the other child is the best way to approach the situation.

As a pediatric professional, you are certainly very entitled to your opinions but I think it would be fair and ethical to note that the NICH, AAP, First Candle / SIDS Alliance, CJ Foundation for SIDS and hundreds of experts and child fatality review teams that deal with infant death every across the US would disagree with your statements.

I'm sorry but I'll take their expert opinion any day which is based on actual knowledge rather than an opinion piece by someone who went to University and now thinks they can debunk the damages of CIO by using only 9 journals.

I don't think there's a consensus here, or that any study has been done that quantifies the opinions of «experts».

«Among political science scholars» I don't think there's a consensus here, or that any study has been done that quantifies the opinions of «experts».

That's the nice thing about being in a party: When you haven't really thought about an issue yet and get put on the spot, you just look up what the experts in your party are saying about it and quote their opinion.

SECOND OPINION While this study attempts to correct factors that muddied previous research, few experts think the question of cancer and emotion is closed.

The fundamental difference in opinion (which has not changed since Michaels and Hansen started debating each other in 1988) is that Hansen (and the vast majority of relevant experts) think that climate sensitivity (how much the globe will warm under a doubling of CO2) is around 3 (+ / -1) °C, while Michaels thinks that it is much less (< 1 °C).

However, if you are following a maverick program that only one or two experts think is correct and you are not getting the results you would have expected you might be wise to question their opinion and your dogged determination to follow it.

In my expert opinion, I thought 1 - 4 hours is polite.

To share your thoughts on this topic ~ please visit the Innovative Teaching group athttp: / / community.educationworld.comcontent / expert - opinion?

When you complain about this on message boards and article posts, excuse me, but stupid people who only do casual reading or fantasy / fiction, think they represent the whole market, are tech experts who should ridicule more sophisticated readers simply because in their opinion an ereader is not a tablet.

I could see that almost reviews about http://essayexpert.us/ is positive and my friend jenniffer was also used essayexpert several times... I think, This service will not make any compramise on Quality, Ontime Delivery, Revision, Customer Support... because i could get the best assistance and i really liked those above mentioned services without any problem... So, based on my experience i can really suggest http://essayexpert.us/ for all students to choose if you have any academic related writing tasks... they are the best and the name itself saying they are the expert in writing assignments... If any of you have any reviews or suggestions or opinion regarding the essay writing services or assignment writing helps, you may please comment here... it may help other students as well...

It's always good to get an insurance expert to give a second opinion, and to make sure you're covered for the things you think you're covered for!

I've seen different opinions on this so thought I'd ask the expert.

So I actually think it would have sold more had it stayed exclusive, although that's just my opinion i'm no expert.

I really think that this could be an exciting development in understanding expert opinion on climate issues.

How much spare time each week do you have to read all the relevant credible published science papers already available for years, and read existing reports by govt / science / economic / agri bodies on the subject matters, and read the state of current research / know how of existing anecdotal narrow focused regional / local analysis and the opinions of experts in their particular field... and then deeply think about all that and come to a rational and reasonable conclusion on it all?

Sure, everybody has a right to their own opinion, but I think that a democracy does not mean that you should not at least put more respect in the opinions of experts... After all, everyone can't be an expert on everything.

If people were offered a better education in science [any science] in high school, I think they would be able to respect expert opinion more.

Our study describes the state of expert opinion, it does not define scientific truth nor does it tell people what to think.

SourceWatch profiles the activities of front groups, PR spinners, industry - friendly experts, industry - funded organizations, and think tanks trying to manipulate public opinion on behalf of corporations or government.

My inclination is to think that the predominate opinion among experts (that what is known about radiative transfer validates AGW theory) is the most likely to be sound — but when I see straw men arguments being articulated, it lowers my confidence in those who claim to have more insight into the technical questions than I have.

My «belief» (more like general sense of how it works rather than a belief — I think that «belief» is too strong a word) is that absent hard proof otherwise, it isn't irrelevant that a «consensus» of expert opinion says that a certain interpretation is probably correct.

But it makes sense for me to be interested in what my colleague says about it, because: a) I know that he is an expert in C; and b) From our common discussions in subfield B, I have experience with how (and how well) he thinks and forms opinions.

If I can force you to guess, do you think that you'd find a similar (what you consider to be paradoxical) pattern play out with the associations between political views and beliefs about evolution / scientific expert opinion on evolution... or nuclear energy... or other issues that display a similar pattern of association between political orientation and interpretations of scientific evidence / how experts interpret that evidence?

On the economic front we had quarterly meetings with 5 - 6 experts who reviewed statistics, did private public opinion polls and gave us their insights on what they thought could happen.

And I don't think «while Judith Curry from Georgia Tech represented the opinions of 2 — 4 % of climate experts that we could be responsible for less than half of that warming.»

Lawyer Monthly has below heard the opinions and thoughts of several US experts, in the legal and security sphere, on current gun regulation in the US, and the prospect of further limitations.

I really don't know, but then again neither do appellate experts such as Howard Bashman, who writes, «Just when you thought that every possible type of appellate opinion had already been created, Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski goes and invents one more.»

Opinions on this subject differ widely, so as part of this week's Your Thoughts Lawyer monthly reached out to a number of experts in the field, but in the UK and beyond, to hear what they had to say.

Following this news a few weeks back, Lawyer Monthly reached out to US sources and experts and heard a few of Your Thoughts on the legal and social matters surrounding this discourse, both of which offer a variant opinion either side of the coin.

If any law society wishes to establish an expert committee to provide draft opinions I can think of a few people who should be consulted.

We would like to invite you and your client to meet with us to discuss an alternative means to resolve this matter in a way that is fair to our clients and respects the mandate of yours... We are of the opinion that, viewed objectively, the state of the evidence to this point demonstrates that this prosecution has no reasonable prospect of success... You have no evidence to respond to our experts and, it seems to us, no reasonable basis to expect they will be disbelieved... We think you will agree that an objective review of Mr. Marschdorf's evidence exposes serious weaknesses in the prosecution case and significant areas of agreement between the defence and your only witness... You are dependent on a theory advanced by Mr. Osborne which misconceives the law.

For example, I'd of thought it would be painfully obvious that a psychological «expert» proffering opinion evidence in a chronic pain case who concedes under cross-examination to «a lack of training and competency in the area of chronic pain» ought to be confronted with his concession (chronicled in the form of adverse judicial comment) his next time out (only weeks later in another chronic pain case).

This week's Your Thoughts focuses on relaying the opinions of professionals and experts across the sector on the autumn budget's outcomes on property legislation, build to rent, stamp duty and investment into the nation's future.

If you need a second opinion (or more), here are a few of the nation's top personal finance experts who think PolicyGenius» new health insurance app is the perfect solution to consumer shopping woes:

It's always good to get an insurance expert to give a second opinion, and to make sure you're covered for the things you think you're covered for!

Now, a new roundup has put together the thoughts and opinions of fashion sites and watch experts that managed to get their hands on the new device.

John Matonis is as close to a subject matter expert for bitcoin as you'll find and his opinions carry significant weight in the community, but I still think he has this one wrong.

Port Orford, OR About Blog An acknowledged Middle East expert, dynamic speaker, author of «Ally to Adversary - An Eyewitness Account of Iraq's Fall from Grace,» and CNN military analyst, retired intelligence officer Lt Col Rick Francona offers his thoughts and opinions on various Middle East topics.

But my comment was purely in regard to my thoughts that agents should not be expected «to examine or interpret» any (expert's) findings in any manner, with regard to any opinion as to any «expert's» involvement, largely due to likely lack of having explicit likewise expert related knowledge.

Also because buyers tend to think of you as an expert — even though you aren't legally expected to have special knowledge about mold and, therefore, shouldn't offer opinions on mold's potential risk — you could be sued for negligence or negligent misrepresentation.