Sentences with phrase «think fags»

i think fags shouldnt have limits so i do nt have limits also!

To use their language, although I am not a fag, I am a fag - enabler — I think fags should be able to marry.

Not exact matches

The biggest sentence is how the thought media outlets reported that I would answer the material: «I inactive fag ashen vs. the city Emergency readiness state, plumage from the palm, Hoyer aforementioned.

«I know you said, «dream sequences are for fags,» but I think it could work, don't you?

I wonder why no - one has had a look at the difference between LA - run community schools and academies / free schools in the context of this story... The result of my quick fag - packet calculations (which I'm sure aren't 100 % correct, but I think are probably pretty much on the money): the percentages of schools which have higher FSM than non-FSM Progress 8 scores are: Free Schools — 6 % Academies — 3.2 % Community Schools — 0.8 % The only reason I had a look is because I was pretty confident that if the figures had been the other way round it would have featured heavily in the article.

They were part of a digression in a talk I gave to the 1970 Exeter conference on children's literature, and if I'd realised then what a powder - keg I was throwing my fag - end of thought into I would have kept my trap shut.

When it comes to being called a fag by a nine year old who thinks he's epic at FPS games and challenges you to a quick scoping match because you accidentally shot him with a sniper without scoping, well, that's what's wrong with the game.

Not Nintendo fanboys — you Metal Gear Solid fanboys who always e-mail me with bullshit regarding my reviews (No kidding, people think some games should get 10/10 ratings) and how you think Raiden's a fag (though he has a girlfriend and was disturbed by Vamp's bisexuality), how Snake is awesome (Yes, we know, shut the fuck up), how The Twin Snakes is better than Metal Gear Solid 2 just because of the story (too bad the presentation of the story is fucked up, you twit) and such.

The thought that CCSM4 AR4 is also overestimating Extent as well as Volume got me reaching for «the back of my fag packet» & while the number produced may be wrong somewhere, it certainly gave me food for thought.

I also think he is unwise releasing his manuscript with so little work done on it — it comes across like a back - of - the - fag - packet calculation rather than a scientific paper.