Sentences with phrase «think game criticism»

«I think game criticism is a good term for us to use, but I don't think there's much being done.

Not exact matches

[1:20] How the kindness of a stranger changed Tony's life [3:35] Peter Diamandis talks about the origins of X Prize [6:30] Technology helping the agricultural industry [7:00] Sequencing genomes [8:55] Life - work integration [11:15] Finding your highest calling in life [12:00] Reframing what is «impossible» [14:00] Strategy vs. psychology [15:00] Changing your state [16:00] The science of achievement, the art of fulfillment [19:00] Living in a beautiful state [24:00] Thinking 10x bigger [28:00] Surrounding yourself with a «nothing is impossible» community [29:00] The news pollutes your mind [31:00] Tony's natural gifts and core beliefs [33:30] Overcoming failure and criticism [37:45] Defining your environment [40:00] Life happens for you, not to you [42:00] Rituals and practices to up your game [46:30] Tony's priming process

Also I think the things I post are usually in the heat of a game and if someone was sitting next to me at the bar they would realize I'm just blowing smoked out of my ass because most of my criticism is followed by a stark smack in the face of humility pretty quick.....

With all the criticism of Arsene Wenger on JustArsenal over the last week, an outsider looking in would think it was safe to assume that Arsenal had lost their last two games and are way behind the leaders in the Premiership.

Plenty of people will denounce overreactions after Game 6, but I think that criticism's misplaced.

Wenger is aware of the doubters, but doesn't think any of this will affect the squad ahead of tomorrows difficult visit to high - flying Swansea, in fact he seems to expect criticism whatever he does during games.

The problem with Gabriel's performance against Utd was that he was rushed back too soon after suffering a hamstring injury and he only returned back from Brazil days before the Utd game... So that was another Wenger mistake and I think that fan's were a bit harsh with their criticism of the player.

And if the Wenger fan base think the criticism is off the back of the league cup final they must of been sleeping for the last decade the problems lay much much deeper than one game and if you guys are happy to live off sentiment then by all means but accept the fact arsenal will never challenge for top honours.

He's not as bad as everyone thinks, i know that game was horrendous and he deserves the criticism, but he came back the next game and scored.

but even if your criticism of Ramsey's consistency was valid, what makes you think that's an area of his game that's incapable of improvement??

you nailed it, i am an akb but this wenger haters always think that the akb's wouldnt critisize wenger but thats just bullshit, its just annoying if the whole team / wenger gets torn apart after every single game and not even with constructive criticism but with irrelevant and senseless posts like whippet / fool etc

Impressed, and I think Sanchez work rate and the criticisms after the Anderlecht, Swansea and United games has sank in, you can be defending suicidely like that, the same problem from last season seemed to not have been addressed, it seemed like City, Liverpool and Chelsea humiliations had been ignored.

He also thinks that Wenger doesn't take any notice of the criticism although he has looked frustrated at time himself, especially when an away fan tried to put up a banner at the Everton game!

Arsenal legend Martin Keown added to that criticism before the game against Borisov, and told the Daily Mail: «I don't think Wenger can completely trust him any more.»

«I think we've allowed ourselves to be open to criticism because of the way the season has gone but we can turn that around and make a statement in these games that we have remaining, and that's our intention.»

Since I didn't make a long list of every good and bad thing I thought Wenger did in this game, but instead chose to focus on a couple of criticisms I had, you infer from that that I think he did nothing right?

When Stephen Colbert asked Chelsea Clinton if Ivanka Trump was fair game for criticism, Clinton responded: «I think anyone who works for the president should expect to be scrutinized for whatever decisions not only he or she is making, but whatever decisions the White House is making on any given day.»

I wish I could say I lacked the ability to find criticism for this game, but I'm sure I can think of a few things.

Overall the game makes a valiant attempt to be something «hip» and new but falls flat and ends up being what i can describe as a boring version of «The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt», if you think of playing this game and haven't played the Witcher 3, please take my advice and play that instead and whilst this may sound spiteful (take it as constructive criticism), anyone who give the game a 10 out of 10 is clearly blind to any of its many flaws.

There were complaints that the game felt too empty; I think this criticism is misplaced.

Although Nintendo has gotten criticism for their use of bringing Wii U games to the Switch, I don't think it's a bad idea.

Reddit user «zamakhtar,» who has already played through the first 7 missions of the game shared his thoughts recently, addressing the main three criticism that the game has received.

Erik is looking for the following: literary / upmarket fiction with an emphasis on plot (as in, nothing too slow / quiet / static); popular and academic / trade science nonfiction, especially evolutionary biology; narrative history and biography; contemporary culture criticism (think Klosterman); sports books, if it's got a scope that extends past just games and players and into culture / larger issues.

I thought it was received very well with only some criticism for the game being too long to the point where it starts to drag it's heels, and the occasional complaint about the Alien's AI being a little off.

Whilst I think your right they are pretty much labeling everyone as a pirate with this move, im struggling to understand the criticisms of alot of hardcore gamers, of the small band of gamers i know not one of us is either surprised by this move from Microsoft or in any way shape or form bothered by it.

I think the best criticism of the game I've heard is what Ashly Burch said during her Hot Pepper Gaming review: «Too puzzly to be an art game, too artsy to be a puzzle game.»

And your talking about raging and tanterms, I have been cool and looked it from all sides, and tried to give criticism in a civil way, or at least I thought I had... I have never kicked anything over lol, and I'm actually still playing the game, the game in itself is the best I've ever played and I just don't understand the last 20 - 30 minutes and I've read so many articles, if I would have been able to understand the ending (like many others) I doubt it would have even been a issue.

It is because of this deep attachment to this certain Zelda that I think, makes discussions over which Zelda is the best or criticism of certain games in the series can get so heated and often turn toxic.

And not just the criticism of games as a concept, but the very particular kind embodied by younger critics used to come up against conventional thinking about games and writing.

Lest you think I am all sunshine and ninja - rainbows about these games, I will offer up some criticism: As a launch title, Revenge of Shinobi suffered from one of the Genesis» few (only?)

Overall the game makes a valiant attempt to be something «hip» and new but falls flat and ends up being what i can describe as a boring version of «The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt», if you think of playing this game and haven't played the Witcher 3, please take my advice and play that instead and whilst this may sound spiteful (take it as constructive criticism), anyone who give the game a 10 out of 10 is clearly blind to any of its many flaws.

Schreier: So in Skyward Sword, a few years ago, I think that a lot of people loved that game — I enjoyed that game quite a bit — but one of the biggest criticisms or complaints was that it took a very long time to actually jump into the gameplay because there were a lot of tutorials and a lot of introduction and cut - scenes in the beginning.

Much of the criticism is so fervent you'd think the army of 18 - to 24 - year - old males who make up the bulk of gaming's old - guard audience were deeply afraid the nature and purpose of playing digital games might change.

I definitely understand the criticism that the original PC release has gotten, but I do think there is some potential for this to be really good — up to four player couch co-op is a huge win for this type of game for me, and active control in the vain of great console hack «n slashes like Champions of Norrath imho really makes this type of game more interesting.

Roughly speaking, we could say game criticism is for game developers and professionals who want to think about the nature of games and what they mean.

But judging by the number of hits that crazy post still draws, the term itself seemed to somehow become a rallying cry - popping up wherever smart people were talking about game criticism, or the lack thereof (again, nothing to do with me - on August 18th game - story duality was the furthest thing from my mind... I was on a plane to Leipzig I think).

After watching the video, I had several thoughts on the subject from many personal perspectives including character development in media, close experience with sexual assault advocacy, and video game criticism.

While there's been I think pretty solid criticism here that the game does more or less force you down a linear path (though it's mostly masked as well as it could possibly be), there is also a sense of autonomy given that you can miss things and you can find information in a different order than other players.

It came away with a headshot in Tuesday's Soul Calibur V review, and if you're thinking of joining the fight you'll need to do some catching up to the rest of the world, especially as my main criticism was of how the game doesn't do quite enough to get you up to speed on its new systems and massive move list.

It came away with a headshot in Tuesday's Soul Calibur V review, and if you're thinking of joining the fight you'll need to do some catching up to the rest of the world, especially as my main criticism was of how the game doesn't do quite enough to get you up to speed on its new systems and massive move...

It honestly feels that Activision, fat from their merger with Vivendi, simply published «Blur» without any quality control or thought for originality, which brings us to the main criticism of the game the graphics.

Although Nintendo has gotten criticism for their use of bringing Wii U games to the Switch, I don't think it's a bad idea.