Sentences with phrase «think games cost»

Now try and think about this from another perspective; Do you think games cost the same to make that they did last generation?

Not exact matches

Torrone thinks you could spend thousands of dollars on parts and build a device less powerful than Kinect, and suggests that Microsoft almost certainly subsidizes the $ 149 cost of the unit, hoping to profit via game sales.

I thought after our draw vs Bourmouth we would have learned how a slow start can cost us... and mostly since we saw how much a good start can impact the game LAST WEEKEND vs Southampton!!!

i think carzola's injury seemed to cost us more, we havevnot been on track since... coq's red card at white hart was painful, otherwise we are a few pts behind spurs w a game in hand.

- chambers must be banned from playing right back he is going to cost us in a game very soon, he has been taken apart in more than three games, most teams use his side to attack whenever he plays, i think flamini is a better prospect till debuchy and jenkinson come back.

I think what Wenger meant by Arsenal playing «good football» is that Arsenal win games by playing clean football, this is not the type that Maurinho plays who gets his points at all cost.

I'm thinking Cam Newton may connect on a miracle bomb against New Orleans, which will somehow cost me the Saints game.

I think Bennett was out of there after he stated, correctly, to the media that the staff had called a stupid blitz at the end of the Washington game at home that season, which pretty much cost the Bucs the game.

I think we can all agree that we are very thankful that the horrible flagrant flop call did not cost us the game.

As big a game as Collins had, I don't think the Patriots used him nearly enough as a pass rusher / blitzer, and it almost cost them the game.

On a side note, I couldn't help but think 2 predominant thoughts when watching the game against Bournemouth on the weekend: (1) Wenger is still willing to put his own personal agenda ahead of the team's best interests when it comes to team selection, which luckily for us didn't cost us the 3 points this time and (2) if Eddie Howe is earmarked to be the successor we are in deep trouble because he's simply a poor man's version of our present manager, as he's tactically inept and has an even worse road record.

I think the slow hook on Grubi cost the Caps a game in the series.

Defence cost us yestday game, well I think wenger doesn't kno what he want, Mou does, he knew mata was too weak for his style he dropped him.

Coq i think has tried to be more offensive than defensive this season which has become a problem for the team, he has some what neglected his defensive duties as a DM, i think his unwillingness and naivety in not fouling or stopping Hazard actually cost arsenal the game.

I am not happy abt wat happened to us, some blame manager, I think Bellerin our best right full back cost us d game, two out of the three goals were his fault.

The fact that the boss had to cope without the two centre backs that would probably have been the starters for the4 big match against Leicester City did not end up costing us this time but I do not think we can rely on a Welbeck goal in the dying seconds of a crucial game too often.

I think I read that Arsenal have frozen any increase on the cost of their tickets for all categories of Arsenal Emirates Stadium games and away games watching fans for next season Arsenal matches.

Off topic anyone notice how ozil was used on the left wing last season and the first part of this season and he was under performing fans and pundits were all saying how wenger should build the team around ozil since that was his best position and he cost us 42m well since his return he has only played either cam or right wing (he said in a interview that those were his fav positions since he played them at real) taking the place of an in form cazorla and it all seems to work I think wenger has done this all on purpose because if u look at ozils overall performance after his injury its much better than before, he tackles, wins the ball back and covers more distance than anyone else wenger does this often using players out of position for a while only to make their overall game better and mostly it works genius

Besides, come to think of it his performance in the Chelsea vs Arsenal game where he failed to send Costa off but did to Gabriel eventually costing Arsenal the game.

I don't think I'm going to renew my 3 season tickets this year, I can't bring my self to pay nearly # 4500 to line the pockets of Kroenke et all, plus the way games, travel costs, hotels for some games, it's just not worth it anymore, very sad after being a season ticket holder for 30 + years, but I'm so disillusioned and angry with the whole thing that's the way I feel.

While many think the league is becoming too soft, the game can no longer adhere to this leave - it - all - on - the - field - at - all - costs mentality, as it has taken a terrible toll on the quality of life for guys like McMahon.

I think Kroenke realises that this a game that he can not play as it will cost him in excess of 150m a year to even sustain a top4 finish year after year.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

This same negativity also cost us games so if you think Wenger and the team are the only ones at fault, go look at the mirror.

is it only me but i thought flamini had a shocker of a game did not really do his duties well hardly saw him break up play and also nearly cost us a goal my number 1 priority is a dm

i.e. Ramsey «on the wing» (how people can't see the role he plays is pretty far from a winger is beyond me) when they think Ox is better suited, despite his lapses in concentration which has cost us goals and continued with his game for England.

You might think that the English FA felt that they should be careful not to do anything bad to Arsenal after the debacle with Mike Dean a couple of weeks ago when he got everything wrong, cost us a vital game and had to have his daft and biased decisions reversed after the game.

Again I think just as with the west brom game (I think) the officials added on too much extra time and it cost us 3 points.

His few clumsy mishaps or lapses in thought in each game can and will cost us over a 90 minute game as we have seen a few times this season.

I think if I'm right about those two claims, then it's not a big step to conclude that (not for the first time) Wenger's game management was puzzling and poor, and could well have cost us crucial points.

As for the price of such physical form, well it has been confirmed that the game will cost $ 29.99 dollars and if you're thinking that's a bit too pricey for a game that's been released previously on other platforms, worry not.

In particular it's gratifying to me to see that the game rewards thinking about sources of long - term competitive advantage, be it from brand recognition, low production costs gained from learning - by - doing (a nice touch!)

Avoid at all cost if you're a fan of the X franchise.Or if you even thought for a second to spend money on this game.

There is a point where no one will buy anything on the iOS app Store unless it cost $ 0.99 cents and that has kind of changed so those things are constantly going up and down but I think a fair price point, taking into account of game content, the longevity of how long an average person would play it, there are always exceptions.

I particularly like the LEGO games as the simple puzzles make him think about solutions, so we're really looking forward to LEGO Dimensions in our house, though the cost is the biggest problem.

Your a real idiot man, ofcourse their not going to talk about it's specs, neither does Microsoft or Sony, tech websites have already taken Wii U apart and looked at it's specs, and said that it's great tech, and the design is clever because of the fact Nintendo is giving you some pretty beefy tech at a low cost, also these tech sites have said, «to see what Wii U is really capable of, we need to see games built for it from the ground up», And Nintendo does have a way better understanding of Wii U's hardware, they were even holding classes at GDC last month to tech indie & 3rd party developers how to cut development time for new games and ported games in half, with a new frame work that they developed specifically for Wii U, and your very stupid if you think that developers are not going to need to learn how to develop for PS4 & the next Xbox.

Was more thinking: — save on shelf space — pre-load and play at midnight — download games to additional consoles in the house at no extra cost — no physical media to lose / have stolen — all games available at your fingertips (particularly amazing when playing switch on the go)

I think games can help teach kids how to think economically (especially strategy games) because they only reward you for doing well and in order to do well you have to be able to analyze every possible choice in terms of cost / benefit and opportunity cost.

Honda offers the 150 - watt AC jack only on Pilots costing $ 38,000 - $ 43,000, as part of rear entertainment system (RES), the thinking being that if your kid brings a game console that plays through the back seat display of the RES, he's going to need AC power.

The thinking there is to make up the profit lost in the console with the cost of games and peripherals.

My credit card rewards finance almost all my entertainment purchases (I paid for half of my TV's cost with gift cards, and I haven't paid cash for a video game in a long time), so I think it's totally worth it.

Think of it this way: It may be costly for your ego if you fall a few points short in a competition, but in the game of finance, a few points of interest can cost you a lot more than bragging rights.

Some people think day - one DLC is a nuisance, and that the content should have been included in the game - preferably at no cost.

the reason Sony did not go with the service is because it would of cost them why pay just to get early access to games once you start doing that with one company then the rest will think they can do...

This does come at a cost, namely that throughout my many games I could never describe Planetary Annihilation as a game that required much thought in comparison to, say, Supreme Commander or the aforementioned Company of Heroes.

I think backwards Compatibility is the right way to go, The Problem with PS NOW was that the cost was too high, It would be cheaper and better to own the 2 previous consoles and buying the game discs.

As for the cost of doing this, I think it would be worthwhile considering that that XBox one and PS4 have been gaining a lot of popularity amongst video game lovers lately.

There's a catch though, with games costing $ 60 a pop, consumers need to know, or at least think, they are getting their money's worth even if the overall experience would be better without the added feature.

DeLong's thoughts about lower costing games join those of Capcom who during a recent investor Q&A session said that as hardware prices see further price cuts, software is expected to follow suit.

I bought a used game of the year version of fallout on 360 thinking it was a great game based on the scores it got and it was one of the worst games I've ever played in my life and I've been playing games for over 40 yrs now... i returned it after a few days even though it only cost me $ 15 I still felt ripped off.