Sentences with phrase «think good rule»

Kimbrough and Gall think a good rule is that the guidelines should go away.

I think a good rule of thumb is to only invest in companies you truly believe in, it will prevent you from the «pigs get slaughtered» scenario and it will fit in nicely with your morals.

I always forget about the purchase red and white wine rule, since I usually drink white, but yes — I think good rule of thumb is always to make sure your guests are taken care of, right?

I think a good rule of thumb is 10 drops per tablespoon of honey.

I think the best rule of thumb is just to avoid feeding your dog things from your table.

The Justice Department thinks a good rule is that the judges should go away.

When it comes to picking out artwork, I think the best rule of thumb is follow your heart.

Not exact matches

As our thoughts turn to nailing down plans for the year ahead, it's a good time to start thinking about these new rules of engagement.

«That set of rules and those thought processes are so ingrained in society today that it's hard to communicate exactly what the vision is, and I think «Reinventing Organizations» does a better job than any other book on communicating that vision and communicating that this is not just a hypothetical like, «Oh, wouldn't it be cool if we did this,»» Bunch said.

Besides, he adds, there's value to normative thinking, too — rules and traditions often exist for good reasons.

A family game night not only provides a unique way to spend time together, it helps children learn to be a good sport, play by the rules, and think strategically.

Most industries are much smaller than you'd think, so treating everyone — even your opponents — with respect is a good rule to live by, especially since you might end up working together one day.

Likewise, he has no interest in going public — «We think we're the best stewards of our journey» — and, while he says he'd never categorically rule out selling the company, it's clear the price would have to be very, very right.

«The financial performance of the community banks shows that Congress and the regulators, I think, have done a pretty good job of tailoring the rules to protect community banks,» Warren said.

As a general rule, I think this is a good practice.

I tried Mint as well, but I thought USAA's was better as I could do more with adding categories and setting rules for recurring transactions to be automatically categorized how I want.

The United States could certainly benefit from a more effective trade policy aimed at reducing barriers to trade through well - thought - out and forceful negotiations and taking actions that are consistent with global trade rules.

you make you rules and self obey to it not because of fear but because you think this is right, and the best setup... you are you master!

The problem, imo, is that well meaning folks are brainwashed (by the $ $ beneficiaries) to think that the old shorting rule was swell without realizing the full implications of the whole mechanism — it's duplicative nature, non-transparency, supply / demand self fulfilment, etc..

The proposed rules are balanced, well thought - out and clearly indicate an intent to make crowdfunding offerings a viable financing path for startups.

In terms of the positioning assets for tax efficiency, I know you think about this as well, any rules of thumb for people?

While I understand the COC is representing the interests of the financial services industry by opposing the Fiduciary Rule, I think their position is myopic - they should be supporting the rule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsRule, I think their position is myopic - they should be supporting the rule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsrule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsors.

«A new U.S. rule aimed at restoring consumers» ability to band together to sue financial companies has survived its first challenge, as a top banking regulator on Monday said he would not petition for it to be suspended... «The rule is a well thought - out response to the serious consumer harm of forced arbitration,» said Brian Marshall, policy counsel for advocacy group Americans for Financial Reform.»

Roger: Well, I think the regulatory agencies historically, in whatever form of capital that gets raised, have always been more reactionary and develop the rules after the innovation has already occurred.

In the soon - to - be-released 4th edition of The New Rules of Marketing & PR, David Meerman Scott (best - selling author and HubSpot Advisor) added a whole new section about newsjacking that got us thinking about our own blog's newsjacks.

While some academics have begun to question whether there needs to be new rules to limit the power of tech giants, almost no one in libertarian - leaning Silicon Valley thinks Facebook should be further regulated, with some saying it forces the best entrepreneurs to be more creative.

Now, governments aren't allowed to step in and bail them out, and I think that wounding down a big bank is absolutely politically toxic for any leader so faced with that choice, most leaders would just break the rules and completely undermine the banking union and that in itself could spark off bank runs as well.

Newly appointed head of the Department of Education Betsy DeVos appears very unlikely to pursue further regulation of for - profit colleges, and I think there's a good chance that the gainful employment regulation and the 90/10 rule are both rolled back.

This is better than doing no planning at all, but I think a customized set of assumptions is always better than using a generic rule of thumb.

Ed Perks: At the risk of oversimplifying it, I think diversification is the best rule to follow when you are thinking about a broader portfolio.

He directed some final jabs at Michael Dell, reiterating that he still thought the founder's buyout offer was too low, and compared the company's board — which postponed the shareholder vote numerous times and changed the voting rules to better Michael Dell's takeover chances — to a dictatorship.

«I don't think the president would rule out any good option.»

Think of the «rules» or what is right and wrong, like a parent who sets guidelines for their child to keep them safe, and when they step out of those guidelines a good parent disciplines the child.

I think a good middle ground would be for the school to rule that anyone should be able to apply to any group they want, and if they pass the admissions process then they can belong to that group.

This rule was not set in place just because someone thought it would be a good idea, but rather because it's necessary to keep in mind the things that are best for our country.

It's interesting to see how people will find their own truth, dig in their heals and be blind to any other idea... What would Jesus do is an interesting question... I consider my self a Christian and a spiritualist... because I believe it's just not as black and white as one religion or another thinks... there is way more grey area... but a fundamental truths that are a good rule to live life by, wether you are christian or not... treat others the way you want to be treated... do unto others... I am my brothers keeper... all apply.

I think Bin Laden pretty much got what he deserved by the Golden Rule... which is Do unto others which you would have done unto you... well I think him KILLING so many means he asked to be given the same treatment!

The rule of law, I think, does not admit very well of the irony of doubt, or any therapeutic gnosticism.

So, generally a good rule to live by, but it does require some thinking.

So I think the better «translation and interpretational method» is to work from English versions that we have, but filter all through sincere love and desire to understand in a loving way, rather than to establish rules and dos and don'ts and judgments.

As for your «righteous» ruler... well, if you think the function of the President is to «rule», you're even more of a lost cause than anyone had imagined.

(2) I take Scripture to be, on what I think to be good and sufficient evidence, the prescriptive norm and paradigm tradition, the canon and rule of faith and practice.

Just like in the times of Christ just because the majority may have rule or power and can out - shout us or be the only ones heard doesn't neccessarily mean they are right or good or capable of demanding we all live and think and believe as they all do.

about people who experience same - sex attraction trying to live a Christian life, this fuller exposition of his thought on the new ideologies presented a fascinating look into the way in which colonialism — discredited by liberals and to lesser extent many conservatives as well — has gone away from the actual military and political rule seen in previous centuries, to a stealthier and subtler form of the exertion of foreign power.

He approves Russell Kirk's dictum that there is no conservatism without natural law: «The «first canon» of conservative thought is: «belief in a transcendent order, or body of natural law, which rules society as well as conscience.

The overarching weakness, he thought, was «a deep need to fulfill the emasculating and benign - to - a-fault role of the good little boy who pleases Mom by following all rules (the civil law, school rules, conventional morality, politeness, etc.)[while] remaining unthreatening and unphysical.»

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

And, honestly, people who view the Bible as «the Good Book» and think it's just about the golden rule or something - well, I'm sure those people tend to be happier than us analytical types - but I think they are taking a lot of verses out of context sometimes too.

It's interesting to think about morals and how we are such moral creatures.There are very few conversations, especially when the subject is about a particular behavior in ourselves or others, that don't involve a value judgement.We're even willing to bend the rules as to what is right / wrong... sometimes stealing and lying can be good things....

Another preacher preaching what ever goes is ok with Christianity... If your going to preach Christianity based on the Bible, then you might as well forget gay marriages are ok... If you want to twist it around then thats up to you... Paul said, «The Berens were of noble charachter because they didn't believe what they heard, but they took what they heard and confirmed it with the Bible... So its like the Yen or Yang... Its either Gods church or Satans Church... Can't be any other way... Do I hate gays, no... I have some very close friends that I have had for over 30 years that are gay, but I think they will be accountable for their life styles... Thats the thing about Christianity, we are held accountable, its not an everything goes belief... Its rules we have to follow... And rules we will be held accountable... So maybe this preacher needs to start a dfferent faith or religion... One where there are no rules and where its people are not accountable for their actions...