He wrote a well - reviewed book called «The Climate Fix: What Scientists and Politicians Won't Tell You About Global Warming,» in which he presents measured skepticism of climate - change orthodoxy — for example, he believes the role of carbon emissions from human industry is greatly exaggerated by politicized science, but he doesn't
think human carbon emissions are irrelevant, and is not implacably hostile to the goal of reducing them.
Not exact matches
Given the knowledge that they are crapping in their own habitat with their
carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning on Earth, I'd like to
think humans have gained an evolutionary advantage which canines lack.
But if
humans, through
carbon dioxide
emissions, are affecting climate less than we
think, would that mean we may have more time to reduce the harmful effects?
A new study, however, shows that forests devastated by drought may lose their ability to store
carbon over a much longer period than previously
thought, reducing their role as a buffer between
humans»
carbon emissions and a changing climate.
For decades, we
humans apparently (somehow)
thought that, because
carbon dioxide
emissions are invisible to the naked eye, they either don't matter or aren't really there.
If our ultimate goal is to reduce
carbon emissions and, hence, to save humanity, we must realize the psychological effect that the disturbing truth may have and teach about climate change and energy in a carefully
thought - out manner based on the available research about
human psychology.
However, I
think the evidence favours a significant climate impact due to
human carbon emissions and therefore some response is required.
If the planet is cooling, even temporarily, then
human carbon emissions can't be a key factor, and we don't want people
thinking that, do we?
I don't
think proper context is provided for example when
human carbon dioxide
emissions are compared with natural exchanges (such as absorption by plants and respiration by animals).
It's not a avery large offset to
human emissions and I
think there bigger concern is that all of this very large reservoir of lake moss peat, this lake
carbon, is stored in permafrost since the sediments refreeze when they drain.»
Since many
think that
human - produced
carbon dioxide is warming the planet and contributing to sea level rise, they wanted to make it clear that if the world doesn't do something to curb
emissions, their island nation could soon be underwater.