Sentences with phrase «think humans need»

Ironically, these are the same folks who'll readily criticize others who disbelieve climate change is a clear and present danger and who don't think humans need to manage the risk.

Thanks for sharing these tools for dog nail clipping — I think my humans need to purchase some new ones, because ours are not very sharp...

And some cats may simply think humans need to pick up after themselves, instead of expecting the cat to bring it back.

Not exact matches

Instead, the command will need to «not appear as being part of the task at hand — which means the robot must think it's deciding to turn itself off instead of obeying the orders of a pesky human.

Startup founders aren't immune to the basic human need to be heard, even if stereotypical Silicon Valley bravado might have them thinking they are, says Moriarty.

Companies need to think twice about doing business in human - rights hotspots.

When my client started thinking about what his various audiences needed from him, his communication got a lot more relevant and meaningful — and more human.

Given that social connection is such a fundamental human need, you'd think that it would be easy to connect with everyone we meet.

The hierarchy argues that we must have our basic human needs (like sustenance and safety) met before even thinking about needs like belonging, achievement or meaning.

As human beings, we frame new phenomenon using our existing mental models, which means we need to think differently in order to succeed in this new era of digital change.

These three brands have tapped into something deeper in all of us with their spot - on video advertising campaigns that, respectively, inspire our love of nature and adventure, our need for human connection and the desire for creative thought and expression.

Whatever emotion you're after, whatever vehicle you pursue — building a business, getting married, raising a family, traveling the world — whatever you think your nirvana is, there are six basic, universal needs that make us tick and drive all human behavior.

«So as much as we all love our technology and we're always pushing out emails, I think we still need to be establishing connections at a human level and building trust that way.

Students also need to learn the critical thinking and creative skills that give human beings the ability to consider the «why» and not just the «how.»

We need bosses who equip businesses with promising talent; who excel at creativity and lateral thinking; and who have the emotional intelligence to herd the complicated urges and behaviours of their employees — most of whom, all hype aside, remain stubbornly human — toward building something great.

The race between automation and human work is won by automation, and as long as we need fiat currency to pay the rent / mortgage, humans will fall out of the system in droves as this shift takes place... The safe zones are services that require local human effort (gardening, painting, babysitting), distant human effort (editing, coaching, coordinating), and high - level thinking / relationship building.

With A.I.'s ability to learn human speech patterns (think of Siri or Google's Cortana), and adaptability to human wants and needs, as well as their living habits (think Alexa or the Google Home), Elon Musk is firm in his conviction that A.I. will only bring destruction.

I do not know of a single adult human being that has given their life to the Tooth Fairy, seen the Tooth Fairy, thinks there is a Tooth Fairy, prays to the Tooth Fairy, given new life by the Tooth Fairy, given hope by the Tooth Fairy, lived by the law of the Tooth Fairy, fought wars with a Fairy banner held high and last but not least Stalin, Mao and Poll Pot felt no need to eliminate and persecute those who held tight to the Tooth Fairy.

Being a whole human journey, not just adhesion to a creed, we need to see the evidence of inner transformation reflected in our thoughts, attitudes, words and actions.

Did Yahweh learn that humans were worse than he thought so he needed to change his law?

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

But, like Samuel Florman, who fears that «flights through cyberspace, however energizing they may be for the imagination, may weaken the objective rationality needed to do good engineering», I agree with Alan Cromer that the formal linear thinking needed to do science «goes against the grain of traditional human thinking, which is associative and subjective» (Florman 1994).

I want rather to emphasize that if we are going to work for the renewal of our polity and local communities, we need to grapple with the fact that real human community requires more unanimity of thought and practice than we have realized.

On the contrary, it is a sad commentary on human kind when they no longer think they need their creator.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

Anyone who thinks of God as arbitrary and capricious needs to have a chat with Mr. Spock, who once so rightly noted, «Nowhere am I so desperately needed as among a shipload of illogical humans.»

When we think of the awful need of humanity at this hour, it seems almost grotesque to turn to the church for help, if by the church we mean not some idealization, but the actual human organizations we know.

Just, Wise, Forknowing (he knows the future), He knows our inner thoughts, He knows the intentions of our hearts, He knows our needs, He's a good father (and if human fathers try to give what kids need (bread, egg), they would net give»em bad things (a stone, a scorpion), He's kind, He's welcoming.

You need to be more tolerant if you want to become fully human, but that will not happen until you think for yourself, which does not appear likely at this stage.

The priest - penitent privilege recognizes the human need to disclose to a spiritual counselor, in total and absolute confidence, what are believed to be flawed acts or thoughts and to receive priestly consolation and guidance in return.

Neither contributes much to the human need for an inclusive vision within which to understand the many divergent strands of life and thought.

here is a question for you to ponder; if god is so powerful that he thought the universe into exsistance, why does he need to cause natural events just to deal with a few medelsome humans; why not just blink those he doesn't like out of exsistance?

Therefore, when we set about to think morally about immigration, we do well to keep in mind Gertrude Himmelfarb's observation about our essential human needs.

After spending time with them though, he realized they were much more similar than he thought because we are all human, we are all broken and we all need help.

I have thought for a long time that Driscoll is a deeply damaged human being, greatly in need of good therapy.

The frequent presence of a «value vacuum» (Frankl) in the personality and relationship problems brought to counselors emphasizes Erich Fromm's conviction that every human being needs a «system of thought and action shared by a group which gives the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion.»

Perhaps we can never manage perfectly such a juggling act, but we need to try — to think of human beings both as bodies, for whom the relentless succession of hours and days leads surely to the grave, and as God - aimed spirits, whose every moment is lived in the presence of the Eternal.

In a global conversation about danger, fear and Syrian refugees, we're seeing a resurgence of the countercultural practice of loving people we don't think are like us — and in extending Gospel - saturated love to them, we realize we are far more similar in our human needs.

Given the stunning turn of events last November, however, we need to suspend our economic faiths for a time to reorient our thinking about the economy around deeper truths regarding the human person and the role of work.

God's receiving the world's achievements into his own everlasting life; God's remembering for ever that which is thus received; God's using for further good the achievements which have taken place in the created order — here are points which need to be emphasized when we begin to think of the worth or value of human existence.

Now, what a child of God does with His truth, is up to them (free will), but everyone needs to know that your soul depends on knowing His truth by reading the Bible, comprehending it, and then abiding (applying) His truth to their lives to produce His righteous truth in all thoughts / beliefs, writings, actions as He instructs us to live while house in human form.

They thought civilization needed religion because despite the danger that religion could turn into fanaticism or narrow - mindedness, it often prompted human beings to strive realistically and humbly for high ideals.

So, first of all, can anyone think of something that we NEED as humans, that does not actually exist?

To think of the first humans in terms of dependence, need, and vulnerability makes me wonder whether Adam could have stubbed his toe, or whether he ever asked Eve for a backrub to relieve his sore muscles after a long day's work.

The demand for consistency thus points to the human need for some universal basis for the assessment of thought — a demand that comes with the force of a moral obligation.

Moses and angels are responsible for the Law and its sacrificial system — which is a reflection of human thinking, not God's need or want for blood sacrifice.

Yet, having stripped away the defunct embryology, we still have the valid metaphysical principle: we still need to find a human cause that could account for the development (a specifically human development) of the bodily organs needed for thinking.

Both I and St Thomas consider that the soul continues to exercise thought and understanding (and indeed will, which is intellectual appetite) after death, and, as St Thomas explains, this can not be in synergism with the imagination in the way it is during human life, but is made possible in ways God provides, and in this way the life of purgatory allows the purification that most people need, while the Saints pray for the living and the dead of whom God gives them knowledge through their vision of Him.

Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way of looking at real things, then we will need to think about freedom, human action, responsibility, the meaning of life, the self, etc. in a new way.

That's why I think we really need to step up the incentives to use more reliable methods that don't count on humans to be too reliable... we just aren't as a species.