Sentences with phrase «think if none»

I think if none of the above suggestions affect his need to get at his penis at night and naps, you are going to end up just waiting it out.

Too bad, I think if none of Italian sides interesting on him, he could be end up his career at China League.

Not exact matches

The problems facing us, many of them are global, like rogue nuclear states, like climate change, and other forms of environmental threats, like terrorists, like maximizing global wealth and prosperity, and none of these are going to be solved if we think of the international arena as one of each nation striving for its individual greatness.

When you think about these three characteristics of successful leadership, none of them would be possible if decisions were made from a place of fear.

If there is none, think twice before you choose this niche.

«I think he's trying,» Mr. Nelson said of Mr. Zuckerberg, «but I think if we don't get our arms around this, none of us is going to have any privacy anymore.»

If one has the wisdom to question their beliefs by actually testing them against data, thinking carefully about valuations, and studying the course of market cycles across history, none of these points should be surprising.

«If you turn off CNBC and think about the market independently for even a few minutes, it is clear that this market displays none of the conditions which have historically been followed by sustained market advances, and all of the conditions which have historically been followed by market crashes.

«I think if you ask most of them, delayed new pipeline infrastructure is better for them than none at all,» he said, adding TransCanada has «no intention of withdrawing our application» if the State Department denies its request for a delay.

This applies to game theory in the group thought that establishes the commonality, «If I have a black - hat link profile and my competitor has a black - hat link profile, we can only all go down in flames, so likely none of us will».

You got ta be kidding if you think that «abuse» button is attached to anything, especially when it comes to none life threating post.

There is no hell... people make their own hell... God is Love and God loves all his children equally and would never condemn any of them to people's perception of hell... none of God's spiritual energy is ever lost and we are made from It... if you think otherwise, that is what you will find when you cross over, until you WAKE UP!

... Only until what we are told and instructed on how to live by others - parents - society... As if none of us have a consciousness thought on our own conclusion of life... Something to think about...

I know several atheists, and absolutely none of them think like this... if they bother to obsess about being an atheist at all.

If I was living on the wrong path leading to death with all the dumb things I was doing like listening to bad music, goofing around in class, cussing, acting like I was a gangster, wanting to try drugs, being suicidal and being around with close friends that are doing the bad then he can change you too because, I tell you that if you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none otherIf I was living on the wrong path leading to death with all the dumb things I was doing like listening to bad music, goofing around in class, cussing, acting like I was a gangster, wanting to try drugs, being suicidal and being around with close friends that are doing the bad then he can change you too because, I tell you that if you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none otherif you think that your life will go for the worst if you accept them then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none otherif you accept them then you're wrong because, if you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none otherif you have faith in him and you accept him as your savior and follow his ways then he has your road all planned out, he's going to give you such blessings and a happiness and love that compares to none others.

The transfigured one's visit to you as an individual will give you that courage of frankness — but what am I speaking of — and if you actively consider the occasion of this talk, then you will stand as an individual before a still more exalted one who, none the less, thinks still more humanly — about the meanness of the occupation, but also infinitely more purely about which occupation is truly honorable.

We've got the same rights, he may think; if Mom should take a notion to shave her head, it would be none of my business.

I think if these people had worried less about what others might be sharing, and just stayed focused on getting their own book done, maybe we'd be talking about how great their book is because it would be published, rather than all the lives they destroyed in trying to control others and make sure none of their ideas leaked out.

Personally, I think you all sound like religious zealot nutbags and if I believed in a god then I'd be thanking that god right now that none of you people are of any importance in this nation.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

All these articles on the media circles are none - sense, if they think that they can stop islam to spread in america, and islam will rule oneday america and sharia will change your abstract ideologies and may allah guide you to islam all haters.

The pope John Paul II said he believed it is possible for none belevers who behave as thought they are following the teachings of Christ even if they don't believe can get into heaven.

None of us think you look like Jesus, so if you plan to wear the name, then be who you say you are.

If you are «none of His», do you think that you make it?

If you think none... better think again.

Then we will never come away empty - handed from prayer, because even if we wind up with none of the things we thought we needed, we will always wind up with God listening, attending and answering our prayers in ways we hadn't imagined.

The only way I found was observation, thought and science but if you try these you see the intrinsic flaws in each of them and none can lead to any kind of real knowledge.

But none of the apostles figure in this story, and whatever historical element may reside in it, it was not the finding of the empty tomb that brought the apostles to faith in the risen Christ, and if Paul ever heard the story he never thought it worth a mention, even when he assembled the evidence of witnesses in I Corinthians 15.

Also, are you seriously too dumb to see that the «blatant lies, none of which are true» was in response to sally's comment «Do you think they could get away with such a blatant lie if it wasn't true»?

We tend to think if we haven't published our first book, planted our first church or gotten married by the time we're 30, then we're on the fast track for a lonely, penniless death which will be mourned by none.

If you take the time to sit and think about each and every story in the Bible, you will realize that none of it makes any rational sense to rational people.

Rather, he thinks that belief in God is rational even if none of the arguments (even Swinburne's) for God's existence succeeds.

None at all that I can see, if you are thinking of punishment in the police - court sense.

None of my friends are to blame for where things ended up, but I think we all wonder if we were prepared for the difficulty of serving in the church without losing soul health in the process.

The book leaves you thinking, «Well, if none of these trappings are necessary for church, what exactly is necessary?»

If you think about what you are reading in the Bible in the context of an all - knowing God who supposedly wrote it, none of it makes any sense.

Get over it, stop trying to tell people what not to believe or do, it harms you none and if you think it does, your an imbecile.

None the less, if it should turn out that one can be a Christian without holding firmly to personal persistence beyond death, this is significant; and since, as I have just been saying, I think that such is indeed the case, I believe that nobody ought to require acceptance of some variety of personal persistence as a pre-requisite for a welcome into the Christian community which is grounded on that faith in God in Jesus Christ which the community exists to make available to men and women in every age.

He went on: «I think, if I'm right, that seven out of 10 complainants left St Benedict's before they completed their education for various reasons and none of them seem to have had, understandably, any love for the school.

You think progressive = left - wing liberal tree - hugging hippie, and NO ONE KNOWS if he was like that or not because none of us were lucky enough to have been around over 2000 years ago.

or the «I believe in illegals but I hate my fellow Americans who are REpublicnas...» I think God will be very unhappy when he learns how we treat his anim als and his garden of eden... if its a matter of choosing who to exist past a certain trial I would suggest most of you could not possible make it, and nor I for my petiness... but at least I am not gay, a killer, a democrat, nor muslim, not even mormom or baptist, thief or self bent on personal damnation thru drugs, alcohol or the like... unfortunately the shooter appears to be none of that... he is mentally ill from all obvious signs...

Let me know how you get on and if none of that helps, I will think again!!

Today I thought I'd share some of my favourite flavour combos of late — if none of these sound appealing, maybe try an apple, pineapple & orange juice instead!

If you think it's crap then fine by me.Some of you are just rude yet you don't want people to act rudely to you.The funny thing is every transfer they've put out including none Arsenal one's are all happening with the exception of the Neymar one.1 mistake out of 100 is very impressive.Idon't care what you say and will continue reporting the truth none the less.If you can't cope with it then stop speaking anyhow.

As raiders fans we know how good hue is at putting offensive players in the right spots to succeed... if hue could make jason cambell look as good as he did, i think hue is just what rg3 needs to come back a real option... just my opinion tho, none of us know whats really gonna happen till it does on draft day..

Because none of these three dingdongs understand «attorney - client privilege», they thought if they included Cohen in the conversation, then they could plot whatever illegal shit they wanted to do.

Arsenal draw against Leicester City, Man City at home and Everton away.And If you think Mou will play for a draw at Stamford Bridge, you are wrong.And in terms of injury Chelsea had none expect Drogba, a position which is well covered by Costa and also Remy.

And the person to blame for these mistakes is none other than the coach himself... i bet he hasn't watched a video of Palace recent games as yet... he wont study opposing teams, thinks we go out there and give it our best... if it doesn't work... Oh well, i still get paid and still have a job!!!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If it's a question of beating the big teams I think there is none which Arsenal has not beaten in the last 2 seasons.