Sentences with phrase «think if the subject»

Not exact matches

«If your company can transform the way it operates to match the way these new workers think, live, and work, you will reap the rewards,» writes Brian Halligan, CEO of cofounder of HubSpot in his massively popular Inc. column on the subject.

Think about the subject line, think about how to formally acknowledge the person, break the copy into paragraphs, avoid shouting by using capitals, make sure that your email is clear especially with what steps need to be taken from here for the customer if they would like to proThink about the subject line, think about how to formally acknowledge the person, break the copy into paragraphs, avoid shouting by using capitals, make sure that your email is clear especially with what steps need to be taken from here for the customer if they would like to prothink about how to formally acknowledge the person, break the copy into paragraphs, avoid shouting by using capitals, make sure that your email is clear especially with what steps need to be taken from here for the customer if they would like to proceed.

Nothing Plus Nothing David Heinemeier Hansson and Jason Fried of 37Signals say «free» thinking will never amount to real business If you want to get Jason Fried riled, all you have to do is bring up the subject of giving your products away.

If you need a response, make it clear in the subject line by saying «please reply» or «thoughts needed on X topic.»

«And, I think we would be really lucky if we found [another subject] that would support this kind of treatment.»

The LRC runs lively, expert reviews of Canadian books — as well as the occasional foreign title, if on a Canadian subject or considered alongside Canadian titles on the same theme — and essays by some of the country's most thought - provoking writers.

Just wondering if you had any thoughts on this subject.

This is a very heated subject, yup, I DO N'T believe in value investing nor apply its principles as the main factor to decide which stock I will buy and I will tell you why in this post, but if you want to cut to the chase, if you want to make money then you need to think outside the box.

If you think it does, all I can say is do some research on the subject and open your eyes.

I know it is comforting to think that, and by all means, if it makes life for you easier, then fine, believe... but you can not logically argue with Atheists and expect not to look foolish on the subject matter because your belief is not based on logic.

So personally, I think they got exactly what they deserved for opening their mouths and complaining over 4 busses having a simple basic add that is not offensive at all except to those who believe they have the right to DICTATE (derived from Dictator) to others what they can and can not do and who SCREAM bloody murder if they are subject to the same rules they themselves wish to espouse.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

My question was aimed for the majority of peope that also disagree with you as much as me and cling to their faith so violently that if someone even broaches the subject, they immediatly lash out and try to either convert the unbeliever, condem him, or bring up the inane, breathtakingly stupid argument of «I can't prove there is a god, but you can't prove there isn't so we're at an impass» — I think that argument is probably the most frustrating thing EVER

You're simply crazy if you think your 2000 year old book of fairy tales holds more evidence than the scientific research done on this subject, research that is within this decade.

Looked at that way, the essential content of revelation, or perhaps the very nature of God (whatever is the ultimate «subject matter» or «object» of the inquiry) dictates certain methods and movements of thought which, if followed, denominate the inquiry as «theology.»

I do think that Organic churches might degenerate into endless theological debates if we are not careful, and so would love to see what they have written on the subject.

For if God were not all powerful then He would be subject to change as would our basis for thought.

I know this is a very touchy subject, but If I am wrong in thinking that His Word is still good for the 21st century then please help me to see what I am not seeing.

By the way, if we are discussing the subject of Gospels being included in the «cannon», as you say, I don't think it ends good for the Gospels, haha.

My constant purpose was and is to adumbrate on every subject I handle a genuinely canonical interpretation of Scripture - a view that in its coherence embraces and expresses the thrust of all the biblical passages and units of thought that bear on my theme - a total, integrated view built out of biblical material in such a way that, if the writers of the various books knew what I had made of what they taught, they would nod their heads and say that I had got them right.

Anyway, let me get your thoughts on the subject in the comment section below, and if you want to learn more about how the gospel truth that Jesus is God fits in with the offer of eternal life through Jesus, take my online course on the gospel:

If you generally think of yourself as a good person, perhaps this subject creates anxiety that you will never be able to be «good enough» when it comes to race... because you are a white person.

What if your son or daughter told you they were gay?Would you follow your narrow - minded, religious bigotry, and curse them to hell?Or, could you find a way to change your mind and continue to love them?Would you slap your kid in the face and kick them out of the house and ask your god why he is so cruel to little - old you?Do yourself a favour and spend a moment thinking on this subject before you spout your hate - fulll nonsense again... and for crying out loud, LAY OFF THE KFC!!

If you want to make a point about people not having jobs... I think you can do a better job of arguing that CNN and other groups are spending too much time concentrating on a single subject.

And if the pure subject of consciousness is the deepest center of nineteenth century thinking and vision, now that subject is violently disrupted, as most deeply understood by Nietzsche himself, and in the wake of that disruption there has occurred the advent of a truly anonymous consciousness and society.

For example, if we are subject to being affected by what others say or think about us, we are at the mercy of their responses to us.

I conclude, therefore, that if Hartshorne's argument is successful, this can only be because it shows that we have not only a direct intuition of God but also a direct intuition of God as eminently psychical, and hence also think or consciously realize that the inclusive whole of which we experience ourselves to be parts is a universal subject of experience.

Consequently, if Hartshorne's argument is successful, it is only because it makes the other and much stronger claim that each of us in every moment is not only dimly aware of God but also thinks or knows God as eminently experiencing subject.

Nothing else is so deeply Augustinian in modern thinking and in the modern consciousness itself, and if Augustine discovered the subject of consciousness by way of his renewal of Paul, it was Paul who discovered the profoundly internal divisions and dichotomies of consciousness and self - consciousness.

«We speak on this subject very cautiously and diffidently,» he writes, «rather by way of discussion than coming to definite conclusions... We suppose that the goodness of God will restore the whole creation to unity in the end... If anyone thinks that matter will be utterly destroyed, it passes my comprehension how all these substances can live and exist without material bodies, since to live without material substance is the privilege of God alone... Another perhaps may say that in the consummation all matter will be so purified that it may be thought of as a kind of ethereal substance... But only God knows.»

The honeymoon, that is, between the now enfeebled and increasingly remote souls who for over a quarter of a century had carped and sneered at Pope John Paul II (and by the same token at «PanzerCardinal» Joseph Ratzinger) but who had nevertheless hoped against hope for a Pope who would be somehow reborn if not as a fully paid - up liberal, as a Pope at least who would go easy on all that counter-cultural JPII stuff about being «signs of contradiction» and about continuity with the pre-conciliar Church and who had breathlessly found (so they thought) that, lo, it was even so, in the wonders of Deus Caritas Est. «On his election last spring,» carolled The Tablet, «the former CardinalRatzinger was widely assumed to have as his papal agenda the hammering of heretics and a war on secularist relativism, subjects with which he was associated as head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.»

If we are to understand any aspect of Whitehead's doctrine of man, we must begin by grasping his thought on this subject.

Finally, Anselm's thought about the atonement, so centered in an awe - full sense of human sin, always left unanswered the question: If the human creature is subject to eternal damnation for having eaten of one miserable apple, how much more unforgivable is the murder of God's son?

Mike i have been thinking hard on this subject i hope you do nt leave the forum as i think we will get into a good debate / discussion the Lord has shown me alot of insight into this subject that i hadnt even thought about until Jeremy proposed his point of view.The word say iron sharpens iron we need to understand what we believe not just walk away because we feel it is treading on our beliefs because they change as we learn and understand because we have believed something for a long time does nt make it right.Use this opportunity to grow to learn and to understand what the Lord is wanting us to know if we cant do this as brothers how are we supposed to do it with unbelievers.brentnz

If one insists on substance thinking, one will posit a subject who enjoys such experience.

They also made mortgage lenders subject to lawsuits — by special - interest groups and pressure groups — if they insisted on what for generations had been thought to be due diligence.

Whatever may be the case with the new theologians who are influenced by «secularization», by «the death of God», or the existentialist conceptuality provided by Heidegger — and here John Macquarrie is an exception, since his Principles of Christian Theology does include a consideration of the subject — not many theologians who prefer to approach the re-conception of Christian theology with the use of «process thought» have published extended studies of «the last things»; or, if they have, I have not come across them.

While this fellow has made some interesting, thought - provoking points, I believe that any argument can run amok if we lose sight of the full counsel of God on the subject.

Now it is obvious you as well have used words to treaten me personally I would stop using verses... it is because my English is not strong to debate and make my self clear and that is why been quoting verses that speaks of the same subject... So as seems if all hate my quoting and that I can not express my self as should, the only choice I have is to stop completely participating in your blogs and rather go to look after my business and family, I think I have left words and links enough for any one who wants to find out what they want to know... so long...

If you think Christians ruind sx, consider in Saudia Arabia a female newscaster was given 100 lashes for mentioing the subject on air.

And do they think that believing that an invisible magic man (who will torture you if you don't believe in him) is really better answer to universe origins than their caricature of scientific conjecture on the subject.

People generally think that if a person has lots of letters after their name, and lots of footnotes in their books, they must be experts on a subject, and must be correct.

I wonder if those who mock science are actually so detached from reality that they think flashlights are alive and therefore subject to evolution?

I might easily, if the time allowed, multiply both my documents and my discriminations, but a broad treatment is, I believe, in itself better, and the most important characteristics of the subject lie, I think, before us already.

I have been known to subject myself to «turmeric shots» if I'm feeling under the weather, but I think adding a little tea and lemon would make them much more palatable — I'll have to try this tea next time!

Finally, and to be serious, if this is the best this author can think of for a subject to write about he must have too much time on his hands.

If you don't want to read about Celtics fans thinking that Barkley is against them then don't go to the comment section of an article on that very subject.

I think most would agree detaining the subjects is necessary if justice is to be served.

The fact that Shkodran Mustafi is also the subject of an ever increasing number of Arsenal transfer rumours certainly increases the amount of scrutiny on the defender, so you would think that we would have heard before if there was anything wrong with him.

That will not be easy as the French have some pretty tasty central midfielders including the likes of Pogba, Cabaye and Matuidi, but there is one man that I think is the main rival for Le Coq and it is the player who has been the subject of as many, if not more, Arsenal transfer rumours than anyone else in the last year or so, Morgan Schneiderlin.