Cognitive biases are tendencies that prompt us to
think in certain ways, sometimes in directions that can lead us astray.
Its an interesting and concerning that people can and do live in information silos (including me) and are kept their by leaders of institutional church who want them to
think in certain ways like you must come to sunday church and made to feel guilty if they do nt.
It is «natural» only in that when you accustom your mind to
thinking in a certain way, the «natural» result is that it becomes more habitual for you to think that way.
The beauty of this words - and - pictures medium is that every day there's an opportunity to make people laugh, or
think in a certain way, or reflect in a certain way.
When an attorney prepares his or her closing remarks the goal is to get the jury to focus on certain facts and
think in a certain way in order to establish the client's innocence and they do not follow the same pattern in each trial.
In the contemporary scientific world of psychology add the word behavioral to cognitive and you change the whole meaning of the word from a description of how we think to why
we think in certain ways.
Most of us learned as children that we had to behave and
think in certain ways to survive in our given env»... Read More
Not exact matches
JM: I
think it'll be an opportunity
in the future for people who are more serious about finding someone, especially someone with specific attributes to use Hinge
in a more targeted
way, either by indicating that they like
certain people, or just being able to filter better, like for sure I only want to match with Christian people.
Zuckerberg said Thursday that «voters make decisions based on their lived experience,» continuing, «Part of what I
think is going on here is people are trying to understand results of the election, but I do
think that there is a
certain profound lack of empathy
in asserting that the only reason that some of them are voting the
way they did is because they saw some fake news.
«The moments you spend being «primed» to
think or act a
certain way can lead you
in certain directions,» she says.
«I
think the press is on the one hand filled with bravado,
in a
certain way, with a sense of mission, and good,» Remnick said.
The Liberals have also put this budget through a gender - based analysis, which involves
thinking about how a
certain measure might affect men and women, or boys and girls,
in a different
ways, while accounting for other intersecting factors such as income, ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation.
So many times, leaders get stuck
in a
certain way of
thinking and don't acknowledge a wide variety of different
ways to attack an issue.
These biases can be cognitive, illustrated by a tendency to
think and act
in a
certain way or follow a rule of thumb.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people
in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't
think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe
in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe
in him, I don't
think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists
think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith
in a God, I don't
think God will solve our problems, i
think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I
think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that
way?
Demanding that people
think a
certain way in order to belong is so clean, so black - and - white simple.
And don't forget all the victims of Christianity's own Jim Jones... I'm
certain you and all you Christian Extremists are
in your churches, always trying to find
ways to brainwash everyone into committing suicide like Jim Jones and have plans to blow up buildings like Timothy McVeigh and
think about as well as act upon your perverted
thoughts by molesting young boys... don't you?
Well I'm sure there is no
way you ant to prove that here on the blog but I'm equally
certain that the next time you walk into a U.S. public classroom you'll have that
thought in the back of your mind «I'm breaking the law»
I don't
think one's moral outlook would normally change rapidly and
certain not
in the ridiculous
way the truthfollower has suggested for someone who doesn't subscribe to alleged divine moral truths.
The target is, rather, those forms of broader modern liberalism which have produced
certain ways of
thinking about faith and the church which can be found
in both conservative and
in so - called «liberal» churches.
Are these contracts to «represent» a company
in a
certain way taking away freedom of speech and
thought and putting the companies which require them
in danger of being insular and abusive?
Each contains
certain characteristic categories of
thought that determine the
way in which its users organize their experience.
And I am
certain he would not have required that all who wanted to join his movement
think in exactly this
way.
I
think for the most part you can't judge an entire group of people all together
in a lump, however when most of them act a
certain way and the
way is contemptible behavior, I
think it's time to take a deep look at it.
And this means that we have no
way to determine what actually is true but only what people
in certain places and times
think to be such.
The pope's statement seems to have been a hastily conceived attempt to communicate a degree of relaxation
in respect of
certain aspects of Church teaching — overlooking that these hints would happily be passed on to the world by a media delighted to report that the pope had finally come around to their
way of
thinking.
In some places it is even illegal not to follow the herd or not to follow the politically correct that demands we be like them, and socially engineers us, into thinking or believing in a certain way, and never ever supposed to think or read anything to the contrar
In some places it is even illegal not to follow the herd or not to follow the politically correct that demands we be like them, and socially engineers us, into
thinking or believing
in a certain way, and never ever supposed to think or read anything to the contrar
in a
certain way, and never ever supposed to
think or read anything to the contrary.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely
certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience
thought by most people to be primitive givens are
in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves
in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
in any simple, straightforward
way (for example, red as we see it does not exist
in the «red brick» itself
in the «red brick» itself).
«I
think if we change that step and really become students of each other's narratives and ask questions about why people perceive
certain things
in a
certain way instead of jumping to judgment, then I
think we'll be better equipped to have more diversity
in local churches.»
But on the other hand, when
in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that
in a
way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a
certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware
in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and
thought, with respect to quickness
in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.
It is enough to provoke both laughter and tears — not only all these protestations about having understood and comprehended the highest
thought, but also the virtuosity with which many know how to present it
in abstracto, and
in a
certain sense quite correctly — it is enough to provoke both laughter and tears when one sees then that all this knowing and understanding exercises no influence upon the lives of these men, that their lives do not
in the remotest
way express what they have understood, but rather the contrary.
But this happens
in two
ways: first, by reason or intellect, insofar as our mind contains
certain general first principles, known to us by the light of natural intelligence, by which we proceed rationaly
in thinking and acting, and secondly by tightness of desire, moving us towards what is known to be good.
In a
certain sense, the postmodern
way of
thinking frees the text from the burden of being private property, returning it to what Karl Krumbacher called the «literary communism» of the Middle Ages.
ps - calling it a blessing is a little edgy but he clearly means that
in a
certain context and I
think its fair for an entertainer to start the conversation with a statement that grabs your attention this
way.
If you do not
think a
certain way,
in some cases be the right gender or «pay to be there»... than you can not come through the door.
In his search for truth, Augustine was genuinely troubled by the Skeptics» arguments that one can be certain of nothing, and that careful thinking in no way provides a reliable guide to a wiser lif
In his search for truth, Augustine was genuinely troubled by the Skeptics» arguments that one can be
certain of nothing, and that careful
thinking in no way provides a reliable guide to a wiser lif
in no
way provides a reliable guide to a wiser life.
I
think that happened to me: I was taught a
certain way, believed it without question, then later
in life learned more and realized it was incorrect.
I
think you answered it later on with the reference to legalism, and I
think that's where we put restrictions on the text to work only
in certain conditional
ways.
I for one
think he would have no problem
in taking it down, possibly providing another alternative, or just being gracious of the fact that
certain people prefer to grieve
in certain ways.
I
think the answer is
in general that God made the world so that if you live
in certain ways then generally speaking your life goes better.
This summary of
certain phases of the Pauline theology — a summary much too brief to do even scant justice to the power and majesty of Paul's
thought — is necessary as a background for the fuller discussion, to which we now turn, of the
way in which Paul interpreted the significance of the earthly life of Jesus as related to this saving act of God.
Why would you even begin to
think that» I» would so over-generalize
in such a
way that to (quote you):» Linking the hate of
certain violent groups with «all» muslims or immigrants everywhere is wrong.»
It's easy to get wrapped up
in the worldly
way of
thinking that you need to perform a
certain way in order to be pleasing to God.
CH: It's not necessary to be a philosopher to be practical,
in certain basic animal and human
ways — and that is why the world got on for a long time without much of what we now
think of as philosophy.
They naturally understand that language works a
certain way in everyday communication, and it never occurs to them to
think otherwise.
To make the point he quotes Dawkins» own «perceptive» summary of Lot
in The God Delusion: «If this dysfunctional family was the best that Sodom had to offer by
way of morals, some might begin to feel a
certain sympathy with God and his judicial brimstone» (Cheekily adding, «Well, Rabbi Dawkins, I
think I'm very happy with that gloss!»)
And... I can
think of many reasons why
certain group of people might not be here, (a ssuming for the moment that your question is accurate), How about... why would «gays» want to be on a belief blog where there are Christians who constantly claim they are an abomination and going to burn
in hell, and they are not worthy of God's love, unless they «change their sinning
ways.»
Living and
thinking are simply
ways in which pure «matter» acts
in certain complex combinations.
You don't need to start confusing people anybody can talk to God the
way they want to there's times that I say father God when I want to reverence him and then there's other times when I say God are there's other times when I just say hey dude don't start making me to a political deal for people to have to
think that there's
certain ways to talk to God everybody
in their own Heart Is Right on how they deal with God
But the more I
thought about my own experience with doubt, the more I realized how grateful I am for
certain «stumbling blocks» that dramatically changed the trajectory of my faith,
in a good
way.