Sentences with phrase «think in absolute terms»

While there is some merit in this, in general, it is incorrect to think in these absolute terms.

For now, ignore the correlation arguments that are meaningless because correlations aren't stable, and think in absolute terms.

Not exact matches

I am reading your newest posts to your oldest.I have never been to bible school but I consider myself in the journey of education concerning the bible.more than any opinions that you have what concerns me most is how «brothers and sisters» through their comments responds to someone who thinks differently from what is perceived as absolutes (not sure if that's the right term) in scripture.I wonder did the apostle believe half the things that are seen as church doctirine today?how did the disciples who did not have the new testament or the ability to read follow Jesus?I appreciate your questioning.In my experience we are too quick to try and fix someone or use the scriptures as a control mechanism and to slow to practise empathy and love..

Practically the market has become an absolute reality, although some thinks it is not the case, at least, in theoretical terms.

Acknowledging that no absolute limits can be set to this central moment, that it can not be precisely bounded on any side, must we not, even so, recognize that when we use the term Jesus Christ we are usually thinking primarily not of an extended movement in history, but of something that happened in Palestine within a specific and rather limited period nearly twenty centuries ago?

This is seen in the tendency today to think about abortion and homosexuality in terms of moral absolutes assumed to be biblical.

In terms of such process thinking (about which I have written in Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in iIn terms of such process thinking (about which I have written in Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in iin Process Thought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onThought and Christian Faith, Macmillan, 1968), God is not thought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes onthought to be simply the absolute, self - existent, unconditioned reality; there is a sense in which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in iin which these terms are applicable as adverbs qualifying God's essential nature — but that essential nature is God's concrete love, his unfailing relationship with the world, his self - giving and willingness to receive from that world, his openness to «affects» from the world and from what goes on in iin it.

Thus Cyril C. Richardson has criticized the classical formulations of the Trinity as imposing an arbitrary «threeness» upon our theological thinking, and proposes instead a basic twofold distinction between God as Absolute and God as Related.1 This is for Richardson a basic paradox, an apparent self - contradiction, for if we try to bring these aspects into relationship, we compromise God's absoluteness.2 Charles Hartshorne accepts this same twofold distinction, but he removes the contradictory element by understanding it in terms of the abstract and concrete dimensions of God's nature and experience.3

Still, it is exceedingly easy to think of «natural law» or the «will of God» in terms of absolute and immutable laws.

The author thinks not, since freedom can not be defined in absolute, only in relative, terms, as freedom from some specific constraint.

Wenger in terms of tactical thinking is a zero, absolute zero.

Why, it's almost as if he thinks that the job of managing a football club is one that should be judged in the medium - and long - term rather than the short -; that the most important thing is where Manchester City find themselves at the end of this season and those to come; and that the best way to get performances from his players is to back them and his own methods, in which he has absolute and justified faith.

Think about the advantage we had over the other traditional top 4 clubs this term i.e stable and capable squad led by the most experienced manager with 20 years experience in the league and absolute control over football matters in the club.

With a long - term injury to Nathaniel Clyne confirmed in the Summer, many people thought that signing a right - back was an absolute must.

When we experience dis - ease, there is a tendency to think in terms of absolutes — curable or incurable — partly due to Western medicine's Biomedical Model, and partly due to modern society's dualistic nature.

The monitoring of literacy and numeracy achievement against a set of absolute proficiency levels would require a shift in thinking on the part of students, teachers and parents who are used to interpreting test performances only in terms of year level expectations.

But I don't think it's a small number in absolute terms, which is all we should care about.

What this means in practice is that traders can take a position in the market even if they only think they can estimate how a stock will perform compared with the broad economy, not in absolute terms.

Another way to think about it, is that when too many managers pursue the same strategy, in absolute terms, it does not matter if you are the best manager of the strategy.

In absolute terms I don't think the miles have appreciated one bit, since the program has more or less remained the same.

Do we need to think in terms of absolutes?

Given that, I doubt that even US employment in renewable energy will fall in absolute terms in 2017, compared with the 2014 number — though you'd have to think that if the ITC does sunset as scheduled that it would restrain jobs growth in renewables generally, and particularly so in residential solar.

Now, in absolute terms, $ 3 trillion is normally thought of as an amount of money that's worth pursuing.

I do think, however, that it is significant (short term, not a firm trend) that CO2, as measured at MLO, has been increasing at a smaller rate than in previous years despite the fact that overall anthropogenic CO2 output is not decreasing and, furthermore, that the short term trend of the absolute increase is also down which indicates a greater rate of absorption of CO2 than in previous years — which to me would indicate an ongoing cooling of the oceans as per the theory that a cooling ocean absorbs more CO2 while a warming ocean releases more CO2.

The machine had trouble with what I think was called an ablative absolute in my Latin class in school («Having determined... etc,» Back then it was «Caesar having crossed the Rubicon,»), with the idiom «falls to be considered,» and with the noun phrase «long - term offender provisions,» for all of which I don't blame it, but which does limit it's utility, of course.

«What we can say with absolute certainty is that if you think about this as something other than a technology company — if you think about this in terms of Apple being the landlord that holds within its building evidence of terrorist activity — there wouldn't be any doubt in anyone's mind that the government should be allowed, with the appropriate court authority,... to go in and take what they need,» he told TechNewsWorld.

I don't think so, at least not in absolute terms.

I'd advise you to try to think in terms of probabilities and not absolutes.