Sentences with phrase «think intelligent design»

I did not say, as I think the intelligent design school seems to affirm, that through scientific methodology, through natural sciences, it is possible to prove design in nature.

As an Atheist I think intelligent design could very well be «possible».

I thought intelligent design was just a summary statement of belief, not a valid testable science..

48 % of people in Britain thought the theory of evolution best described their view, 17 % thought intelligent design best described their view and, startlingly, 22 % of British people thought creationism best described their view.

Not exact matches

If scientists come to the conclusion of intelligent design, you think they're going to sweep it under the rug?

Noah did not say or think anything about intelligent design.

I think that «intelligent design» was used in my iPod 4!

So it rightly criticises creationism and «intelligent design», yet it rarely challenges the mystifications of deep environmentalist thinking, such as Gaia theory, or the numerous varieties of Eastern mysticism that are so fashionable in Hollywood.

There was a time when I was, independently, reading Behe and all about intelligent design and was thoroughly involved in debating «evolutionists» and arguing with people accusing them of thinking only within the «trance» of science.

Do you really think they would let us know of any proof they might find about intelligent design.

Unfortunately, the minority voice in the communitiy tends to be incredibly vocal and, at times, hostile in the sole attempt to delude the general public into thinking that, if one is a scientist or intelligent, one does not believe in a God or subscribe to intellingent design theories.

Sure there's a bias against intelligent design in the scientific community, just like there are biases against anything that can not be proven and is a product of wishful thinking.

Anyone who really think's intelligent design happened does not need to be employed in scientific pursuits.

I believe in intelligent design but not that he will die and come back to save from our so called sins is the term I think is used.

Why do you think the «christians» are trying so blasted hard to ruin school systems here in the states by making them teach «intelligent design» and «abstinence only»?

I'm thinking of scientists who believe in intelligent design.

Heres a radical thought, maybe the being who is intelligent and sophisticated enough to design a universe or two has a more developed higher since of justice than us.

All you guys can think whatever you want... Though the design in everything created is not work of nothing... Just like everything in this world a car, a robot, a painting, everything has an intelligent human behind its design.

I think life forming as the result of intelligent design is a perfectly rational scientific theory.

With all the evidence, religious people ought to be intelligent design (I mean god - guided evolution by this) supporters at worst, though I would hope that after some serious thoughts on the moral paradoxes induced by belief in the «divine» people would come to their senses.

So when Watson and Crick discovered DNA and how it works the very last thing they expected was for creationists to delude themselves into thinking that this actually demonstrated intelligent design.

@Pedro» I don't care if an atheist thinks I'm unintelligent for believing in intelligent design.

I don't care if an atheist thinks I'm unintelligent for believing in intelligent design.

For example, what do you think about what you would call offering your children a «choice» between the facts of evolution or intelligent design?

Well, I would think that people would be intelligent enough to recognize that all we see and experience is by a design and realize that the entire universe is calibrated like an expensive watch.

I think if a scientist (not teaching a class) wants to explore the idea of intelligent design, that shouldn't immediately destroy his career.

Most Intelligent Design theorists claim to be agnostic about the nature of this intelligent designer, but many will admit privately that they think that the intelligent designer is God.

I let the batter sit for about 8 hours (due to morning enthusiasm and midday laziness rather than any intelligent design); I think that letting it rest a short while gives the flour granules time to absorb some of the liquid so it won't be too grainy?

That extra step of thinking about it is designed to make the intelligent nurses (and I agree, not all are) think about whether the formula is the right step for this mother - baby dyad.

A BBC Horizon programme last week covering the recent court case over the teaching of intelligent design in US schools commissioned a MORI poll asking what people in Britain thought.

41 % think that «intelligent design» should be taught in science classes, 40 % that it shouldn't.

None of this means that the Discovery Institute, the Seattle - based think tank that promotes intelligent design, has been idle.

Why do you think anyone listens to the people pushing intelligent design as an alternative to evolutionary theory?

These biases create some immediate concerns about our increasing reliance on artificially intelligent technology, as any AI system designed by humans to be absolutely «neutral» could still reinforce humans» prejudicial thinking instead of seeing through it.

You might think that Spore's fatal flaw would be that it supports intelligent design rather than Darwinian evolution.

«We think that intelligent design is not, for this reason, a scientific proposal, and also — from a theological and philosophical point of view — is a wrong answer.»

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, in contrast, wrote an article that appeared in The New York Times in which he suggested that neo-Darwinian thought was incompatible with Catholicism and instead gave implicit support to intelligent design.

NCSE's Glenn Branch is concerned that «their thinking, presumably, was that getting intelligent design in the public schools would at least accomplish a lot of what they wanted, if not all.»

INTELLIGENT THOUGHT: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement John Brockman (Vintage Books)

It challenges conventional thinking through a design that is forward - looking, intelligent and energetic, while retaining clarity of purpose and function.

I think evolution is a device of the intelligent design with limited span.

Nonetheless, his discovery and others like it, refracted through the lens of dichotomous thinking, result in articles with titles like, «Scientists Confirm: Darwinism Is Broken» by Paul Nelson and David Klinghoffer of the Discovery Institute, which promotes the theory of «intelligent design.»

How is it that so many here think they can encapsulate the concept of «intelligent design» within such narrow parameters.

Nick is only partially right, I think, about current controversy over Christianity in court, at least in the US, as witness recent cases on «intelligent design».

It is thought to as an «intelligent transaction platform» where the system uses smart AI algorithms that have been designed to aid in the execution of optimal trades and transactions to maximise returns.

I am in desperate need of blog design help... as intelligent as I think I am, not that I'm a super-brain or anything, but I am NOT dumb, for the life of me, I can't figure this graphic design thing out!