Sentences with phrase «think is talked»

I believe there is a grieving process involved with it, which I don't think is talked about much.

While you shouldn't try and trick your audience into thinking they're talking with a human, your chatbot can add a level of personality to your brand, resulting in a higher level of engagement from your audience.

If someone were to say that we're living inside a giant computer, many people would probably think they were talking about The Matrix.

We're not trying to be all things to all people, which is what I think you're talking about.

I've said this so many times I'm sure many founders are smiling thinking I'm talking about them when I'm really talking about you.

«I think we're talking about a growth of 2 percent, probably accelerating even in the second half of the year.»

At first, he thought I was talking about the made - up terrorist group from Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX)'s «House of Cards.»

If we mentioned the classics, they would think we're talking about --

Because it doesn't exist it's all in your head, the part you think that is talking to you is your own brain, nothing more.

God would have more credibility if he used just one voice, so people who think they're talking with him could compare notes.

«Why, you'd think He's talking straight to you and me.»

I think he's talking more generally about non-denominational churches that have become personality cults centered on a charismatic pastor.

What scriptures did you think He was talking about?

I don't agree with Rachel much either but I think she was talking about people predisposed to be believers in the first place.

She might say, «I thought we were talking about religion.

I transitioned out of any normal form of Christianity before giving up on thinking I was talking to Jesus or God or both.

The Gospel writers think they're talking about things that actually happened, like the resurrection If these things didn't happen, N.T. Wright claims, he's got other things to do with his life.

The Gospel writers think they're talking about things that actually happened.

I think we are talking about the difference between choosing «to be» homosexual, and choosing «to act» upon the homosexual desires.

I think we are talking past each other on the point of whether the geometry of the universe is a question of mathematics.

So I'm thinking we're talking about Coldplay or something.

Uhh... and I think you're talking about Islam, not Christianity, Judaism, or Buddhism (yes, more of a philosophy) than a religion.

You think she is talking about today and the consequences of the sexual revolution — after all this is the book's topic — but she ends up talking about communism and the cold war, current dietary restrictions and food obsessions, and the historically prior widespread popular acceptance of smoking tobacco (primarily cigarettes).

I thought we were talking about preferences in worship.

i think she's talking about the millions of women who read fifty shades of grey., as she has mentioned earlier in the article.

«I was brushing up against what happens when you think you're talking about one thing, but for a number of people, you're unsettling an entire framework that has political, economic, social [and] family [implications].»

If we read these passages thinking they are talking about how to receive eternal life, we will get very confused.

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

I don't think he's talking about a guy who buy's stolen good's and resells them, which would be the mob version you speak about...

So let me get this straight... when you read what the Founding Fathers said as «the people», you think they were talking about The Church?

Some have been deceived in prayer, thinking they were talking with God.

JR, I think we're talking about two different aspects of theology.

The church claims they mistakenly thought she was talking about her stepfather, who worked for the church, and couldn't believe he would do such a thing.

However, we should recognize that when we do so, we are speaking quite differently than the biblical authors who naively thought they were talking about actual events.

I think we are talking past each other.

However, I think I am talking about bullying... when people say things that fall under those 10 signs of abusive speech... the kind that is intended to belittle, threaten, and even destroy another.

Do you honestly want to put the fate of your nation in the hands of someone who thinks he's talking to God??? That gets you a 72 hour committal, not the presidency.

I think that's talking about fullness of life now.

If you just talk about justice, either people are not going to have a clue as to what you're talking about, or they're going to think you're talking about God being passionate about criminal justice, as chief prosecutor, or something like that.

In the last line, what armies do you think he is talking about?

I don't think that's talking about beyond the grave.

whoops... I thought you were talking about Obama...

I have often said, «Do not think I am talking about anybody else, but I mean you, and you, and you.

I thought I was talking to someone else.

Just more religious fanatics who are ignorant of what they think they're talking about.

I think he is talking of bigotry everywhere.

If you listen to the comments these Mormons are making, you would think they were talking about some underdog who that was never provided any opportunity in life but has risen above it all to defy the odds and is our nation's potential savior.

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

Think we are talking while having different worlds in mind... so thanks and bye since not being my favorite subject to talk about we all had freedom of choice and each has chosen his or her path and bare the consequences and results there of.

I can certainly relate to the kind of think you are talking of David with prayer, though I didn't have a partner to share that with as you have with Lisa.