Sentences with phrase «think know it all example»

i can relate a bit to AW like me once your over your 50s you start thinking differently like the world owes you something and you think know it all example likes of Jose Mourinho,

Not exact matches

«I knew when I was eighty that I would never, for example, think about why I walked away from my 1994 Wall Street bonus right in the middle of the year at the worst possible time.

In one of her workshops, she gives the example of a superior saying to an employee «I think this project will be a lot more successful if we got to know each other better... how about we continue this meeting upstairs in my hotel room?»

It could be interesting to think about what you'd like to be known for, for example, if you're a real estate company or a content marketer, people should instantly be able to recognize that from looking at your profile.

In the example of Thacker's client who frequently told himself «That's not going to work,» Thacker encouraged him to challenge the thought, asking, «How do I know that?»

Think of the setup of a smart home, with for example, a refrigerator that knows when to order new groceries.

«It is a luck of timing,» Tom Ascheim, president at the network, told Fortune, adding: «I would love to say that we were brilliant enough to have the foresight to know last fall that [Jenner's Vanity Fair cover] was coming, and we also orchestrated this to be here at this time but of course we didn't... I think (Jenner) is our most famous example of what is becoming a broader trend as the transgender community is coming out of the proverbial closet.»

If you're thinking about extending equity to an employee or a vendor (as in the example above), you should know that the topic is multi-faceted.

«And in example after example, radical notion after radical notion, Jay and Shel don't just make the assertion about something that challenges everything we thought we knew about marketing — they give readers chapter - and - verse examples that make the case for one simple concept after another that... well, could just revolutionize everything.

If GDP is growing nominally at 20 %, for example, and you can borrow at 7 % (which was the case in China for much of this century), you should rationally borrow as much as you can and invest it into anything that moves, no matter how poorly thought out the investment.

If you know the role you are hiring for requires flexibility under pressure, creative thinking and obsessive attention to detail, have the candidate offer you specific, measurable examples of where they have demonstrated these three qualities.

For example, I know someone who thought that paying the minimum payment each month was all that they needed to do so that no interest would build up.

This is the perfect example of what Dave Ramsey does best: gets people thinking about getting out of debt and getting their money on track when they feel powerless or like they don't know what to do.

Choosing a business credit card that does not report to personal credit may be helpful if you know there will be times you need to run up charges that put you close to the limit or carry a balance — think holiday inventory, or that big tradeshow, for example — and you don't want that activity to bring down your scores.

But it's an example of that you're, you know, you're using an accepted source, and wait a minute, that's so different from what I think, that must be wrong.

Mixing personal stories with engaging interviews and examples from well - known personalities — Mark Zuckerberg, Al Gore, Tim Ferriss, Seth Godin, and others — Reinventing You shows how to think big about your professional goals, take control of your career, build a reputation that opens doors for you, and finally live the life you want.

For example, we're no longer thinking of moving abroad after early retirement, but our goals are pretty much the same.

For example, if the sleepy portfolio approach would not have generated much in returns over the past ten years or if it did great, I think it would help people to know that.

For example, if you're thinking about refinancing your home to take out capital, did you know leveraging your retirement funds instead through ROBS would save you money in interest and monthly payments?

And it just goes to show a lot of people's edge, and in his case, I think, for example, is that is his ability to stick to his system, you know, much like you talk about in blackjack where he says, «Look, this is what I do and realize there's gonna be times of underperformance,» and not changing his whole approach when markets are down or he's doing poorly.

No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling error, thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But, in fact, I really did have in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...

I think you know the analogy effected with most of the examples you provide is that like God, these beings and creatures are all magical, and lack any hard evidence to support their existence.

I don't know how many planets were known when the Bible was written, for example, but you would think that an all - knowing and omni - present deity would know that some of the «stars» were actually planets, and informed the scribe of such.

In this sense we say things like, «it is in the nature of human beings» or «it is natural for human beings» to, for example, conceive and be conceived in male - female coitus, nurse their young, employ productive and practical reason, desire to know, live in walkable settlements, think in symbolic narrative, live well, etc..

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

As I think of it I can really only find local sports people as examples, not people you would probably know.

The purpose of revelation is not that we should come to know God personally or enter into personal communion with him (although this idea is found in certain strains of Islamic thought, for example Sufism), but that we should just learn what he tells us to do.

It seems to me that in the New Testament, Paul is especially adamant on the point (in I Corinthians 10 - 11, for example), that Christianity is no place for the flaunting of privilege or distinction (whether class or ethnic or whatever), and I think that is exactly what happens anytime you have a church were some members are cool and know it (and flaunt it), while others are not so much.

In general, based on the 2003 interview, it doesn't look like Santorum knows how to talk or think about this issue very well; he doesn't, for example, appear to know how to distinguish the three levels of the right to privacy debate: a) the natural rights level, b) the Constitutional level, and c) the plain - old law level, state and federal.

Think, for example, of the Arabic word al - Jahaliya, which I have always known to mean the domain of ignorance.

I know most of the arguments for why some Christians say that we should not vote (see, for example, this book: Electing Not to Vote), and I understand their concerns, but I think that most of these arguments are invalid.

Does anyone know what Tocqueville thought, for example, of Hector Berlioz, the rather heroically - attuned French composer of his time?

If the US,, for example would finally decide that abortion was murder then,, I think more people would feel bad about it, keep from doing it, and then know to ask God for forgiveness.

For example one may think of Hartshorne's well - known doctrine from The Divine Relativity that we can know and love ourselves only because God knows and loves us (see 16 - 17).

I would add, following the example of the best American Catholic «public philosophers» John Courtney Murray and Orestes Brownson, that we should, as loyal Americans [we Porchers and REM fans are all about standing for the place where we live], actually explain why our Fathers built better than they knew — which means criticizing their thinking and affirming [most of] their practice with a theory that at least wasn't completely their own.

I think we all know that the U.S. Government is not a prime example of moral uprightness.

I know, for example, that when I see a colleague, whatever I may think of him / her (or whatever she / he may think of me), I am supposed to offer a greeting.

I cited other known examples of when people think they are seeing something significant when all they really see is just nothing.

The Christian extreme bias that a person is evil simply because they don't think Jesus was any more than a good example of how humanity should treat each other, is a position non-believers know too well.

An example is one day i came across a video named «how to be stupid» and I immediately say in the front of my head «be the holy spirit» and I said «NO NO NO» have I actually committed the unpardonable sin because I've gotten so used to the ocd thoughts now I'm saying in the front of my head an I don't mean them.

Chances are, you can think of a few examples off the top of your head: Hardee's campaign featuring women in bikinis erotically eating giant cheeseburgers, (which is not only degrading but — as any person who has ever had a Hardee's cheeseburger could tell you — wildly inaccurate), Post-it's ad that shows a man in bed with a women who has a Post-it note with her name on her forehead (You know, so he doesn't have to actually remember it).

For example, atheists and theists can be friends and work together as long as they both loosen their grip on what they think they know.

@tallulah13 The Greek gods were made in the image of men by men, some, Hercules for example was a man.The living God made man in His image.You choose, but if you continue to avoid honest debate I'll quit replying to you.There are many examples of proven Bible truths, the Greek b.s you brought up just confuses the real issue and adds nothing to the conversation.You know it, I know it, so does any thinking person.Focus on the topic at hand or go elsewhere.

For example a century ago, the only transportation was the horse riding or camel or donkey and so on... you can not imagine at that time people would be thinking about travelling the globe in a day or two... and we do not know what is coming as every scientists theory is being abrogated by a new scientist and the old one becomes obsolete... these also proves that human theory can not be perfect and will never be perfect... there will always be modifications...

The development of cognition in general is conceived in Piaget's genetic theory as a reconstruction of earlier forms of cognitive organization with new means and on a new level; the best known example of this development is the transformation and reconstruction of sensori - motor activity schemata into symbolic - conceptual thinking operations.

Unlike God's work and teachings in this later era, where compassion and kindness for one's fellow man are the whole of the law (by word, but more importantly, in example after example, that when we think we know God's law and set forth to make prey on our fellows using it as our succor, that indeed, no matter the crime, the answer is to treat each other with dignity, humility and love).

For example people in the past use to think being gay was a mental illness, we now know through unbiased research that is NOT true.

One could look at the example of Rome, at a country that thought itself the center of the universe, treating the world as if it belonged to Rome, constantly extending outward without realizing that the core of Rome could no longer support the weight of the extended empire.

For example, Martin Heidegger argues that the whole modern view of the person as an active subject engaged in the process of knowing leads to the «nihilism» of Nietzsche, to the idea of knowing as the pure exercise of the will to power which has its fullest expression in contemporary science and technology (see, e.g., QT): In one sense my response can only be that I believe knowing is most truly understood as an active process, and that I think that the idea of a purely receptive knowing is a myth, albeit perhaps an appealing one.

For example, I think that there are serious problems with the notion of a pure «contemplative» or «receptive» mode of knowing.